Re: [NTG-context] Re: LucidaBright fonts...I'm stumped

2005-12-04 Thread Hans Hagen
Henk Koster wrote: Hans, you said that you posted an updated version of cont-fnt.zip, but all I could find was the 1-12-2005 version without texnansi fmt-files (only the ec ones). Anyway, I have enough information now to apply the LB fonts if I choose to do so. Again, many thanks for the respons

[NTG-context] Re: LucidaBright fonts...I'm stumped

2005-12-02 Thread Henk Koster
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 16:34:07 +0100, Hans Hagen wrote: > i'm wondering ... do the lucida font nowadays ship with the math > specific tfm files (that used to be the case) > > Hans Well, my copy of the LB (and LB Expert) fonts dates from 1993 (on floppies), although Y&Y sent me a free update with

Re: [NTG-context] Re: LucidaBright fonts...I'm stumped

2005-12-02 Thread Hans Hagen
Henk Koster wrote: As a follow-up to my earlier message... I don't understand why ConTeXt cannot use the LB .afm/.pfb/.tfm files that are already present (for the texnansi encoding) in my LaTeX setup. Why does texfont need to duplicate all these files? Does ConTeXt not use the directory path se

[NTG-context] Re: LucidaBright fonts...I'm stumped

2005-12-02 Thread Henk Koster
As a follow-up to my earlier message... I don't understand why ConTeXt cannot use the LB .afm/.pfb/.tfm files that are already present (for the texnansi encoding) in my LaTeX setup. Why does texfont need to duplicate all these files? Does ConTeXt not use the directory path search of teTeX? It se