I think this concept would help keep the styling (setups) away from
the structural markup (section, tables etc). This would be a much
desirable feature.
saji
On Jul 11, 2007, at 4:43 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
>
>> @Hans: Is it possible to int
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
> @Hans: Is it possible to integrate a setups key into \bTABLE to write
> something like \bTABLE[setups=table:noframe] to avoid the \start/\stop
> and \setups{..} commands as I did in my example above.
I second this request. In fact, a setups (or setu
Hi Wolfgang,
Thanks very much for the detailed response. I have been organizing a
co-ordinated document development project (more in the next mail)
with my colleagues. We use a wiki to input contents, which I then
scrape with hapricot and filter into a context document. Having
a setup like what yo
2007/7/10, Saji Njarackalazhikam Hameed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Is there a way to reset a \setupSomeThing[ ] directive?
>
> Consider for instance a complex setup for TABLES. Imagine
> I have used this setup for some parts of the document, but
> later on I want to have a radically diffe
Hi Folks,
Is there a way to reset a \setupSomeThing[ ] directive?
Consider for instance a complex setup for TABLES. Imagine
I have used this setup for some parts of the document, but
later on I want to have a radically different setup for TABLES, say.
Is there a convenient way to do this as we c
