Hallo!
With ConTeXt ver. 2006.09.26, figure numbering is working as
expected.
> > >> You need the option
> > >> \setupfloats[numbering=nocheck]
is not longer needed, but
> you can see a bad sideeffects by figurenumber=nocheck in my
> example
this sideeffect is visible both, with nocheck and wi
2006/10/2, Wolfgang Werners-Lucchini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This was your example (not exactly the same) you posted as your> first example file and works now as expected.
Ahh! I should implement my own testsuit.Wolfgang
Hi Wolfgang
you should not only make a testsuit.
It is normaly better to
> This was your example (not exactly the same) you posted as your
> first example file and works now as expected.
Ahh! I should implement my own testsuit.
Wolfgang
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-c
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 20:53:50 +0200
"Wolfgang Werners-Lucchini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > What ConTeXt Version is it where
> > > \checkfloatracer is defined?
> > >
> > > Gru?, Wolfgang
> >
> > Hi other Wolfgang
> >
> > \checkfloatracer is defined in page-flt.tex as
> >
> > \def\checkflo
> > What ConTeXt Version is it where
> > \checkfloatracer is defined?
> >
> > Gru?, Wolfgang
>
> Hi other Wolfgang
>
> \checkfloatracer is defined in page-flt.tex as
>
> \def\checkfloatracer#1%
> {\newnodelocation{#1}}
I asked this, because in ConTeXt 2006.09.26,
which I use, there isn't a
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:30:57 +0200
"Wolfgang Werners-Lucchini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > \def\floatcounter[#1]%
> > {\bgroup
> > \checkfloatracer{\v!float#1}%
could be replaced by \newnodelocation{\v!float#1}
> > \nextnodelocation{\v!float#1}%
> > \analyzenodelocation{\v!fl
> \def\floatcounter[#1]%
> {\bgroup
> \checkfloatracer{\v!float#1}%
> \nextnodelocation{\v!float#1}%
> \analyzenodelocation{\v!float#1}%
> \tagnodelocation{\v!float#1}%
>\egroup}
Hallo Wolfgang!
What ConTeXt Version is it where
\checkfloatracer is defined?
Gruß, Wolfga
2006/9/18, Wolfgang Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 16:10:05 +0200Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It is obviously (my example shows this), that there must> > be a hidden number.> >> > What is its name?> > How can this number be influenzed?
Hi Wolfgang
if where not ab
On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 16:10:05 +0200
Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wolfgang Werners-Lucchini wrote:
> >> You need the option
> >>
> >> \setupfloats[numbering=nocheck]
> >>
> >> in your document settings.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Hallo Wolfgang!
> >
> > This works.
> > How do you find your pe
Wolfgang Werners-Lucchini wrote:
>> You need the option
>>
>> \setupfloats[numbering=nocheck]
>>
>> in your document settings.
>>
>>
>
> Hallo Wolfgang!
>
> This works.
> How do you find your peaces of wisdom?
>
> But I have not understand the whole figurenumber thing.
>
> It is obviously (my
> You need the option
>
> \setupfloats[numbering=nocheck]
>
> in your document settings.
>
Hallo Wolfgang!
This works.
How do you find your peaces of wisdom?
But I have not understand the whole figurenumber thing.
It is obviously (my example shows this), that there must
be a hidden number.
On Thu, 07 Sep 2006 22:03:42 +0200
"Wolfgang Werners-Lucchini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hallo!
>
> Is this correct behaviour?
> -
You need the option
\setupfloats[numbering=nocheck]
in your document settings.
> \starttext
> \placefigure{}{\f
Hallo!
Is this correct behaviour?
-
\starttext
\placefigure{}{\framed{Blub}}
\placefigure{}{\framed{Bautz}}
\placefigure{}{\framed{Bla}}
This were \rawnumber[figure] figures by now!
\setnumber[figure]{8}
We want to count on with \rawnumber[figure].
13 matches
Mail list logo