On Oct 9, 2008, at 11:22 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
hard to test without test files and fonts -)
Yes, I can see that :-) Your crystal ball is broken, then?
you can try
\ctxlua{fonts.trace=true}
and see what is handled
Well, that kind of confirms my suspicion. I attach the relevant stuff
Hans,
I still have some problems with my fonts in the latest beta. Maybe it
has to do with the latest optimizations. I'm just wondering: in my
Greek typescripts, I define several fontfeatures and connect them with
featurefiles, like so (just an example, the list is longer):
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Hans,
I still have some problems with my fonts in the latest beta. Maybe it
has to do with the latest optimizations. I'm just wondering: in my
Greek typescripts, I define several fontfeatures and connect them with
featurefiles, like so (just an example, the
Hi Hans,
the latest beta has a problem with font handling: in my Greek output,
the letters sigma and sigmaalt don't work anymore; they're
replaced either by some undefined character (box with letter X in
it) or by empty spaces. I tried to find out where something has
changed, but haven't
Martin Schröder schrieb:
2008/7/16 Peter Rolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
the results (don't continue to read if you want a happy end):
pdftex 1.40.3 produces a pdf, that shows no side effects when it's
included by the same version of pdftex (1.40.3).
if i include that pdf with the current 1.40.9-rc1 i
Peter Rolf schrieb:
Martin Schröder schrieb:
2008/7/16 Peter Rolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
the results (don't continue to read if you want a happy end):
pdftex 1.40.3 produces a pdf, that shows no side effects when it's
included by the same version of pdftex (1.40.3).
if i include that pdf with
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Peter Rolf wrote:
Martin Schröder schrieb:
2008/7/16 Peter Rolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
the results (don't continue to read if you want a happy end):
pdftex 1.40.3 produces a pdf, that shows no side effects when it's
included by the same version of pdftex
Mojca Miklavec schrieb:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Peter Rolf wrote:
Martin Schröder schrieb:
2008/7/16 Peter Rolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
the results (don't continue to read if you want a happy end):
pdftex 1.40.3 produces a pdf, that shows no side effects when it's
included by the same
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Thanks, for the heads up. The luatex trunk is a bit in flux at the
moment. We are trying to squeeze the previous half year of pdftex and
texlive development into it, and it takes some effort.
For the repository users of luatex: The trunk seems to be
compiling and
Taco Hoekwater schrieb:
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Thanks, for the heads up. The luatex trunk is a bit in flux at the
moment. We are trying to squeeze the previous half year of pdftex and
texlive development into it, and it takes some effort.
For the repository users of luatex: The trunk seems
Peter Rolf wrote:
Taco Hoekwater schrieb:
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Thanks, for the heads up. The luatex trunk is a bit in flux at the
moment. We are trying to squeeze the previous half year of pdftex and
texlive development into it, and it takes some effort.
For the repository users of
Taco Hoekwater schrieb:
Peter Rolf wrote:
Taco Hoekwater schrieb:
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Thanks, for the heads up. The luatex trunk is a bit in flux at the
moment. We are trying to squeeze the previous half year of pdftex and
texlive development into it, and it takes some effort.
For the
sure. if someone can point me to the windows binaries of pdftex 1.40.3 i
can test that.
Maybe the one from TeX Live 2007?
http://www.tug.org/svn/texlive/trunk/Master/bin/win32/pdftex.exe?view=log
Mojca
___
If
Mojca Miklavec schrieb:
sure. if someone can point me to the windows binaries of pdftex 1.40.3 i
can test that.
Maybe the one from TeX Live 2007?
http://www.tug.org/svn/texlive/trunk/Master/bin/win32/pdftex.exe?view=log
thank you Mojca (revision 5403).
Mojca
Mojca Miklavec schrieb:
sure. if someone can point me to the windows binaries of pdftex 1.40.3 i
can test that.
Maybe the one from TeX Live 2007?
http://www.tug.org/svn/texlive/trunk/Master/bin/win32/pdftex.exe?view=log
one thing left: pdftex.pool is missing (the good old days with
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Peter Rolf wrote:
Mojca Miklavec schrieb:
sure. if someone can point me to the windows binaries of pdftex 1.40.3 i
can test that.
Maybe the one from TeX Live 2007?
http://www.tug.org/svn/texlive/trunk/Master/bin/win32/pdftex.exe?view=log
one thing left:
Taco Hoekwater schrieb:
Peter Rolf wrote:
Taco Hoekwater schrieb:
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Thanks, for the heads up. The luatex trunk is a bit in flux at the
moment. We are trying to squeeze the previous half year of pdftex and
texlive development into it, and it takes some effort.
For the
2008/7/16 Peter Rolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
the results (don't continue to read if you want a happy end):
pdftex 1.40.3 produces a pdf, that shows no side effects when it's
included by the same version of pdftex (1.40.3).
if i include that pdf with the current 1.40.9-rc1 i get the wrong color
in
Dear magicians,
I just updated to the latest betas (ConTeXt and LuaTeX taken on
svn://scm.foundry.supelec.fr/svn/luatex
and I tried to build luatex on my machine (MacBook Pro under Mac OS X
10.5.4): everything goes fine, the binary is there, that is in
trunk/build/texk/web2c/luatex
but trying
Otared Kavian wrote:
Dear magicians,
I just updated to the latest betas (ConTeXt and LuaTeX taken on
svn://scm.foundry.supelec.fr/svn/luatex
and I tried to build luatex on my machine (MacBook Pro under Mac OS X
10.5.4): everything goes fine, the binary is there, that is in
Hi all (Hans, Taco...),
thre appears to be a problem with font-syn.lua in the latest release.
First, there's a typo in l. 291. I think
if not filename and not reloaded and fonts.name.autoreload then
should be
if not filename and not reloaded and fonts.names.autoreload then
But even after
On Apr 16, 2008, at 12:26 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Can you test the latest upload? This should be fixed now
(arrows forthcoming).
Hi Taco,
yes, latest upload works. Looking out for arrows...
Thanks
Thomas
___
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Hi all (Hans, Taco...),
thre appears to be a problem with font-syn.lua in the latest release.
First, there's a typo in l. 291. I think
if not filename and not reloaded and fonts.name.autoreload then
should be
if not filename and not reloaded and
Am 2008-02-17 um 20:12 schrieb Taco Hoekwater:
Running 0.20.2 0r 0.22.0 ? I eased the pattern file rules a bit for
0.22.0, it could be that is why Hans has no problems?
Whatever the version is that I get at 2007-02-17 22:11 via ctxtools
still shows the problem.
My setup is TeX Live 2007
Ahoi,
just tried to update via ctxtools, but making formats stops at Greek
hyphenation patterns:
(/usr/local/texlive/2007/../texmf-local/tex/context/patterns/lang-
agr.pat
! Nonletter.
l.234 ᾿
2ρ1῾2ρ
If I press r to continue I get a long list of more Greek nonletters.
Is that
On Feb 17, 2008, at 12:12 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Ahoi,
just tried to update via ctxtools, but making formats stops at Greek
hyphenation patterns:
(/usr/local/texlive/2007/../texmf-local/tex/context/patterns/lang-
agr.pat
! Nonletter.
l.234 ᾿
2ρ1῾2ρ
If I press r to
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
On Feb 17, 2008, at 12:12 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Ahoi,
just tried to update via ctxtools, but making formats stops at Greek
hyphenation patterns:
(/usr/local/texlive/2007/../texmf-local/tex/context/patterns/lang-
agr.pat
! Nonletter.
l.234 ᾿
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Hans Hagen wrote:
i wonder ... why can i generate formats here that don't show that error
As someone (Mojca?) said earlier, ConTeXt is afraid to show tantrums on
your computer :-)
Aditya
___
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Hans Hagen wrote:
i wonder ... why can i generate formats here that don't show that error
As someone (Mojca?) said earlier, ConTeXt is afraid to show tantrums on
your computer :-)
Running 0.20.2 0r 0.22.0 ? I eased the pattern file rules a bit
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 3:24 AM, Jeff Smith wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 7:10 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
The command needs to be in a single line (it has been broken in mail).
So folder-with-otf-lm needs to stay in the same line (and you need
to replace it with the actual folder).
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 6:59 AM, Mojca Miklavec
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You need the following four files in the proper location
(TDS/fonts/map/dvipdfm/lm/):
http://minimals.contextgarden.net/current/fonts/common/fonts/map/dvipdfm/lm/
(accessible through rsync as well)
Great! Matter
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 7:10 AM, Mojca Miklavec
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The command needs to be in a single line (it has been broken in mail).
So folder-with-otf-lm needs to stay in the same line (and you need
to replace it with the actual folder).
OK -- now it compiles fine, although
Jeff Smith wrote:
On Jan 19, 2008 6:40 PM, Mojca Miklavec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you have rsync on your computer, the fastest way to resolve the
problems would be to call
rsync -av
rsync://contextgarden.net/minimals/current/fonts/new/fonts/opentype/public/lm/
folder-with-otf-lm
On Feb 13, 2008 4:41 AM, Jeff Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 19, 2008 6:40 PM, Mojca Miklavec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you have rsync on your computer, the fastest way to resolve the
problems would be to call
rsync -av
the latest beta refuses to work with most of my (Greek) fonts. I have
compiled the very latest trunk (rev. 1006, I think). Difficult to make
a minimal example because it doesn't happen with simple Latin text,
only when there's Greek in the file. The error message is always
similar:
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
the latest beta refuses to work with most of my (Greek) fonts. I have
compiled the very latest trunk (rev. 1006, I think). Difficult to make
a minimal example because it doesn't happen with simple Latin text,
only when there's Greek in the file. The error message
On Feb 13, 2008, at 5:05 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Here's a minimal example for the start:
texexec --xtx --make --all
but this has already been reported and I'm not sure if it's the same
problem.
/context/texmf-context/tex/context/patterns/lang-agr.pat
! Nonletter.
l.206 4´
On Feb 13, 2008 4:55 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
the latest beta refuses to work with most of my (Greek) fonts.
hard to check without a small test file;
Here's a minimal example for the start:
texexec --xtx --make --all
but this has already been reported and I'm not
On Jan 19, 2008 6:40 PM, Mojca Miklavec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you have rsync on your computer, the fastest way to resolve the
problems would be to call
rsync -av
rsync://contextgarden.net/minimals/current/fonts/new/fonts/opentype/public/lm/
folder-with-otf-lm
and then mktexlsr.
Hi Hans,
great: I now get Greek hyphenation with XeTeX as well! However,
there's a problem with mkiv: none of my mkiv-typescripts works with
it; I always get this error:
This went wrong: ...al/texlive/texmf-local/tex/context/base/luat-
tmp.lua:121: attempt to call field 'is_writable' (a nil
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
On Jan 31, 2008, at 10:43 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Hi Hans,
great: I now get Greek hyphenation with XeTeX as well! However,
there's a problem with mkiv: none of my mkiv-typescripts works with
it; I always get this error:
This went
On Jan 31, 2008, at 11:17 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
ok, i'll make a new beta zip; i dunny what went wrong; normally
there is
no reason to delete the cache; can you test again?
Hans
Great, this one works! Thanks for your swift action, Hans. I haven't
played with zipped trees yet, but
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
On Jan 31, 2008, at 11:17 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
ok, i'll make a new beta zip; i dunny what went wrong; normally
there is
no reason to delete the cache; can you test again?
Hans
Great, this one works! Thanks for your swift action, Hans. I haven't
played
On Jan 20, 2008 7:57 AM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Thanks Mojca, that worked! Now that I have your attention, may I ask
another question: a couple of months ago, I was wondering about using
fonts that are NOT installed on the system but are in one of the texmf-
trees. In typescripts, we have
On Jan 20, 2008, at 5:45 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Yes. See type-otf.tex:
\definefontsynonym
[LMRoman10-Regular]
[file:lmroman10-regular]
[features=default]
features=default is defined in font-ini.tex:
\definefontfeature
[default]
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Thanks Mojca, that worked! Now that I have your attention, may I ask
another question: a couple of months ago, I was wondering about using
fonts that are NOT installed on the system but are in one of the texmf-
trees. In typescripts, we have the name: and file:
Is anybody using XeTeX with the latest releases? Even the most basical
Hello World document doesn't compile with this error (both stable
and beta, regardless if the document actually uses Latin Modern or
not). Any hints?
Thomas
bodyfont: 12pt rm is loaded
kpathsea: Illegal fontname
Hi Thomas,
I may confirm that on my installation the same thing happens.
I use:
ConTeXt ver: 2008.01.16 13:49 MKII fmt: 2008.1.19 int: english/
english
and the log file is identical to yours (I have a MacBook running Mac
OS X 10.5.1).
Of course I have no idea what is going wrong
On Jan 19, 2008 6:05 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Is anybody using XeTeX with the latest releases? Even the most basical
Hello World document doesn't compile with this error (both stable
and beta, regardless if the document actually uses Latin Modern or
not). Any hints?
The new beta has been
On Jan 20, 2008, at 12:40 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Jan 19, 2008 6:05 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Is anybody using XeTeX with the latest releases? Even the most
basical
Hello World document doesn't compile with this error (both stable
and beta, regardless if the document actually uses
How many languages did
you learn and use during the last years? I'm waiting for lispTeX,
pythonTeX,
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/User:Luigi.scarso#Luatex_hosts_python
--
luigi
it's new .
it's powerful .
it's luatex .
http://www.luatex.org
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
On Jan 9, 2008, at 11:06 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
you can also test this (there is a file 'context' somewhere as stub)
mtxrun --script context blabla.tex
i.e. this is the upcoming replacement of texexec in case of luatex/
mkiv
Hans
Yes, it works if I call it
Hi Hans,
there seems to be a problem with the latest beta; compilation stops
with several of these warnings:
error define font: font with name lmromanslant12-regular is not found
error define font: name: lmromanslant12-regular, loading aborted
! Font
On Jan 9, 2008 9:22 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Hi Hans,
there seems to be a problem with the latest beta; compilation stops
with several of these warnings:
error define font: font with name lmromanslant12-regular is not found
error define font: name: lmromanslant12-regular, loading
On Jan 9, 2008, at 9:54 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hans has updated files without a please don't update yet warning
(that's what beta in ConTeXt means, after all :).
Drats, I always thought it meant download immediately!
A new version of LM is in front of the door, and ConTeXt tries to be
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hans has updated files without a please don't update yet warning
(that's what beta in ConTeXt means, after all :).
A new version of LM is in front of the door, and ConTeXt tries to be
kept up-to-date, or better, ahead-of-time.
hey, since you were in this
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Hi Hans,
there seems to be a problem with the latest beta; compilation stops
with several of these warnings:
error define font: font with name lmromanslant12-regular is not found
error define font: name: lmromanslant12-regular, loading aborted
! Font
On Jan 9, 2008, at 10:48 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
aha, i need a bidirectional fallback ... making a new beta now
since i have both names on my system it's tricky to test (don't want
to
mess up things too much)
Hans
New one works... Thanks for the quick fix!
Thomas
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
On Jan 9, 2008, at 10:48 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
aha, i need a bidirectional fallback ... making a new beta now
since i have both names on my system it's tricky to test (don't want
to
mess up things too much)
Hans
New one works... Thanks for the quick fix!
On Jan 9, 2008 10:17 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
On Jan 9, 2008, at 9:54 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hans has updated files without a please don't update yet warning
(that's what beta in ConTeXt means, after all :).
Drats, I always thought it meant download immediately!
Such specific
On Jan 9, 2008, at 11:06 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
you can also test this (there is a file 'context' somewhere as stub)
mtxrun --script context blabla.tex
i.e. this is the upcoming replacement of texexec in case of luatex/
mkiv
Hans
Yes, it works if I call it with
mtxrun --script context
Hi all, Taco, Hans,
this combination of latest betas:
This is LuaTeX, Version snapshot-0.20.2-2007121721
CtxTools | context version: 2008.01.03 16:25
gives me output without the usual TeX ligatures (fi etc.).
I'm uncertain whether it is worth reporting such things or whether,
given the
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Hi all, Taco, Hans,
this combination of latest betas:
This is LuaTeX, Version snapshot-0.20.2-2007121721
CtxTools | context version: 2008.01.03 16:25
gives me output without the usual TeX ligatures (fi etc.).
I'm uncertain whether it is worth reporting such
Hi,
I was looking on the Context Wiki and Pragma to check whether
the Context version I am using is still up to date.
I am using Context version 2007.06.06 09:53.
But on Pragma in the download area the main Context distribution has
a date/timestamp 2007-04-17 14:03. On the Context Wiki on the
Hi,
I was looking on the Context Wiki and Pragma to check whether
the Context version I am using is still up to date.
I am using Context version 2007.06.06 09:53.
But on Pragma in the download area the main Context distribution has
a date/timestamp 2007-04-17 14:03. On the Context Wiki on the
On Sun, 1 Jul 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I was looking on the Context Wiki and Pragma to check whether
the Context version I am using is still up to date.
I am using Context version 2007.06.06 09:53.
But on Pragma in the download area the main Context distribution has
a
Hello Wim,
I was looking on the Context Wiki and Pragma to check whether
the Context version I am using is still up to date.
I am using Context version 2007.06.06 09:53.
But on Pragma in the download area the main Context distribution has
a date/timestamp 2007-04-17 14:03. On the Context
Hi,
The ConTeXt releases starting from 2007.01.12 have a few major
changes that seem to catch some people unawares.
1. As of 2007.01.12, ConTeXt uses a 'pdftex' executable, no longer
'pdfetex'. This matches up with the release of pdftex 1.40, where
there no longer is a separate 'pdfetex'
Hi,
A small addition, discovered while Mojca and I were helping out
Dalyoung with the dvipdfmx warnings (offlist). See below.
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Hi,
The ConTeXt releases starting from 2007.01.12 have a few major
changes that seem to catch some people unawares.
1. As of 2007.01.12,
The latest ConTeXt (ver: 2007.01.18 12:57 MKII fmt: 2007.1.18 int:
english/english) will not process my files. The log file has:
...
(/usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf.local/tex/context/base/type-akb.tex))
kpathsea: Running mktextfm lmmi7
/usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf/web2c/mktexnam: Could not map
Alan Bowen wrote:
The latest ConTeXt (ver: 2007.01.18 12:57 MKII fmt: 2007.1.18 int:
english/english) will not process my files. The log file has:
(/usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf.local/tex/context/base/type-akb.tex))kpathsea:
Running mktextfm lmmi7
Alan Bowen wrote:
On Jan 18, 2007, at 8:34 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
Alan Bowen wrote:
The latest ConTeXt (ver: 2007.01.18 12:57 MKII fmt: 2007.1.18 int:
english/english) will not process my files. The log file has:
On Jan 18, 2007, at 8:34 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
Alan Bowen wrote:
The latest ConTeXt (ver: 2007.01.18 12:57 MKII fmt: 2007.1.18 int:
english/english) will not process my files. The log file has:
(/usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf.local/tex/context/base/type-akb.tex))
kpathsea:
Running
On Jan 18, 2007, at 8:54 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
Alan Bowen wrote:
On Jan 18, 2007, at 8:34 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
Alan Bowen wrote:
The latest ConTeXt (ver: 2007.01.18 12:57 MKII fmt: 2007.1.18
int:
english/english) will not process my files. The log file has:
On 18 Jan 2007 at 15:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.gust.org.pl/projects/e-foundry/latin_modern
gets a
Resource not found
message. (Is there another source?)
Thats a typo at that web-site:
take 'latin-modern' not 'latin_modern'!
but there is no aktuall lm to download at the moment
Alan Bowen wrote:
On Sep 27, 2006, at 3:04 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
Alan Bowen wrote:
On Sep 27, 2006, at 12:32 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
Alan Bowen wrote:
\doifnotallmodes{mode1,mode2,mode3}{
defaultmode instructions
}
gets�the following error message:
system� � � � � : mark BibTitle
On Sep 28, 2006, at 3:39 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
Alan Bowen wrote:
On Sep 27, 2006, at 3:04 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
Alan Bowen wrote:
On Sep 27, 2006, at 12:32 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
Alan Bowen wrote:
\doifnotallmodes{mode1,mode2,mode3}{
defaultmode instructions
}
gets�the following
\doifnotallmodes{mode1,mode2,mode3}{ defaultmode instructions}gets the following error message: system : mark BibTitle defined [subject] ! Missing number, treated as zero. to be read again \scct:0 \catcodetable ...\fi \the \csname @@cct:\number #1
Alan Bowen wrote:
\doifnotallmodes{mode1,mode2,mode3}{
defaultmode instructions
}
gets�the following error message:
system� � � � � : mark BibTitle defined [subject]
! Missing number, treated as zero.
to be read again
� � � � � � � � �� \scct:0
\catcodetable ...\fi \the \csname
Alan Bowen wrote:
On Sep 27, 2006, at 12:32 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
Alan Bowen wrote:
\doifnotallmodes{mode1,mode2,mode3}{
defaultmode instructions
}
gets�the following error message:
system� � � � � : mark BibTitle defined [subject]
! Missing number, treated as zero.
to be read again
�
Thanks, Hans! I got today’s version and all is now well again.
Very best, Alan
On Aug 29, 2006, at 6:43 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
Alan Bowen wrote:
I updated to 2006.08.29 11:11 and find now that \quote{} produces
double quotes (� �) rather than single quotes (� �).
\quotation{}
still has
On Aug 29, 2006, at 4:25 PM, Alan Bowen wrote:
I updated to 2006.08.29 11:11 and find now that \quote{} produces
double quotes (“ ”) rather than single quotes (“ ”). \quotation{}
still has its expected effect.
Is this a bug or has something gone awry with my installation?
Cheers, Alan
Alan Bowen wrote:
I updated to 2006.08.29 11:11 and find now that \quote{} produces
double quotes (� �) rather than single quotes (� �). \quotation{}
still has its expected effect.
Is this a bug or has something gone awry with my installation?
a missing \else in:
Alan Bowen wrote:
On Aug 29, 2006, at 4:25 PM, Alan Bowen wrote:
I updated to 2006.08.29 11:11 and find now that \quote{} produces
double quotes (� �) rather than single quotes (� �). \quotation{}
still has its expected effect.
Is this a bug or has something gone awry with my
Hi,
tonight I installed the todays built of Context in a minimal tree. - No
problem so far!
Bases on the recent discussions concerning a glyph I fetched the latest
font-zips from the polish site.
After installing everything it appeared, that a wrong set of mapfiles
for iwona is loaded. I
Hans—
Many thanks for fixing this—and my apologies for being so slow to
get back to you, a result of problems with my ISP and the usual end
of term frenzy.
Best, Alan
On Apr 8, 2006, at 9:07 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
Alan Bowen wrote:
Hans�
I attach a very short sample source file that
Alan Bowen wrote:
The latest stable (ConTeXt ver: 2006.04.06 23:00 fmt: 2006.4.7
int: english mes: english) release fails to compile a file that
worked previously and returns the error message:
! Missing number, treated as
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Hans and all,
there are two unpleasant things in the lates releases which may be bugs:
1. newtexexec --module --pdf does not work, it just doesn't process
the modules (works with old texexec)
2. not sure if this is a misconfiguration on my system, but when I
Hans—
I attach a very short sample source file that will produce the
failure not only using the latest stable ConTeXt (ver: 2006.04.06
23:00), but also the latest beta version (ver: 2006.04.06 15:27,).
Thanks for looking at this.
Alan
2006.04.06_TEST.tex
Description: Binary data
On
Alan Bowen wrote:
Hans�
I attach a very short sample source file that will produce the failure
not only using the latest stable ConTeXt (ver: 2006.04.06 23:00), but
also the latest beta version (ver: 2006.04.06 15:27,).
ok, fixed, i'll upload another alpha release for testing
Hans
Hans and all,
there are two unpleasant things in the lates releases which may be bugs:
1. newtexexec --module --pdf does not work, it just doesn't process
the modules (works with old texexec)
2. not sure if this is a misconfiguration on my system, but when I
try to use texmfstart, I get
Oops, I spake too soon. Both issues seem to be resolved with the
current stable release! Sorry for the noise!
Thomas
On Apr 7, 2006, at 2:29 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Hans and all,
there are two unpleasant things in the lates releases which may be
bugs:
1. newtexexec --module --pdf
The latest stable (ConTeXt ver: 2006.04.06 23:00 fmt: 2006.4.7
int: english mes: english) release fails to compile a file that
worked previously and returns the error message:
! Missing number, treated as zero.
to be read again
I can confirm this. Font protrusion seems to be broken in the current
release; whenever I switch it on, I get a similar error.
Thomas
On Apr 7, 2006, at 3:17 PM, Alan Bowen wrote:
! Missing number, treated as zero.
to be read again
\relax
\dododefineprotrudefactor
Yup. Relnotes will follow in an hour or so ...
luigi.scarso wrote:
Is 2005-08-15 latest distro ?
luigi
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
___
Is 2005-08-15 latest distro ?
luigi
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Release Notes:
http://contextgarden.net/Release_Notes
Cheers, Taco
luigi.scarso wrote:
Is 2005-08-15 latest distro ?
luigi
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Just wanted to mention that I'm back to my box with the latest
ConTeXt. Uncommenting the line
\resetmapfiles \usetypescript [map] [base] [all]
and commenting everything else in the \resetmapfiles-department
appears to have fixed all my troubles in OS X. Let's see if htings
continue to
301 - 398 of 398 matches
Mail list logo
