On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:35:58PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 13-5-2010 11:26, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:25:06PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 13-5-2010 10:06, Khaled Hosny wrote:
Nothing special, I always expect interline space to be fixed, I don't
know if TeX always
On 14-5-2010 2:37, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:35:58PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 13-5-2010 11:26, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:25:06PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 13-5-2010 10:06, Khaled Hosny wrote:
Nothing special, I always expect interline space to
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 02:54:49PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 14-5-2010 2:37, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:35:58PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 13-5-2010 11:26, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:25:06PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 13-5-2010 10:06, Khaled Hosny
Am 2010-05-13 um 23:09 schrieb Hans Hagen:
I recall trying grid a while ago but it didn't work, looks like I
have
to set \setuplayout[grid=force].
for sure there are bugs as it needs much testing but we have
predefined grid setups:
% none don't enlarge
% halfline
On Fri, 14 May 2010 06:37:02 -0600, Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org
wrote:
for arabic you really need to set the interline space (idris might
have more input on this)
- it has more height than depth
Not always عٍ or فيٍ is as deep as high is أً.
so for say 12pt arabic we should use 8pt ht
[reshufling the order a bit]
First of all - I forgot to express my positive surprise - all the
horizontal breaks including hyphenation are *exactly the same* in MKII
and MKIV all over the document, even though MKII and MKIV are using
different fonts. Which is really nice.
\startyoumayignorethis
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Mojca Miklavec
mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com wrote:
also, commands starting with \latex behave unpredictable in mkiv due to
luigis compatibility mode
That was the best comment in the thread. Thanks for making me a day :)
hm, I'm pretty sure to don't know what
On 13-5-2010 3:42, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
\startyoumayignorethis
The only thing that really bothers me are so much different vertical
differences which show up in almost every document I ever write. MKIV
consistently takes more vertical space, so no matter what document I
try to recompile, it
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 04:16:12PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 13-5-2010 3:42, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
\startyoumayignorethis
The only thing that really bothers me are so much different vertical
differences which show up in almost every document I ever write. MKIV
consistently takes more
On 13-5-2010 4:32, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 04:16:12PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 13-5-2010 3:42, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
\startyoumayignorethis
The only thing that really bothers me are so much different vertical
differences which show up in almost every document I ever
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 05:00:01PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 13-5-2010 4:32, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 04:16:12PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 13-5-2010 3:42, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
\startyoumayignorethis
The only thing that really bothers me are so much different vertical
Dear Hans,
(I'll answer the rest later)
Did you try to run that with MKII? MKIV works fine (I know that the
title was a bit misleading). I get the characters from font that are
equal to the second byte of UTF-8 representation of input character.
you probably need to enable utf8 in the mp
On Thu, 13 May 2010 10:00:01 -0500, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 13-5-2010 4:32, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 04:16:12PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 13-5-2010 3:42, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
\startyoumayignorethis
The only thing that really bothers me are so much
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 01:46:28PM -0500, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد
wrote:
On Thu, 13 May 2010 10:00:01 -0500, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 13-5-2010 4:32, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 04:16:12PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 13-5-2010 3:42, Mojca Miklavec
On 13-5-2010 10:06, Khaled Hosny wrote:
Nothing special, I always expect interline space to be fixed, I don't
know if TeX always make interline spacing variable, but this wasn't an
issue with English text. However, with Arabic, Tashkil marks seems to
always cause a noticeable extra whitespace
On Thu, 13 May 2010 15:06:09 -0500, Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org
wrote:
Something I find very annoying is variable interline spacing, if I've,
for example, a line with some Arabic words vocalized I get some times
too much white space above it that it almost looks like an empty line.
It
On 13-5-2010 9:31, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد wrote:
Sometimes forcing will look nice, but even then one probably has to add a
bit of interlinespace to the latin font to get the right balance. That is,
a latin document that uses a LOT of interparagraph arabic will want a bit
extra
On 13-5-2010 7:08, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 05:00:01PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 13-5-2010 4:32, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 04:16:12PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 13-5-2010 3:42, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
\startyoumayignorethis
The only thing that really
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:25:06PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 13-5-2010 10:06, Khaled Hosny wrote:
Nothing special, I always expect interline space to be fixed, I don't
know if TeX always make interline spacing variable, but this wasn't an
issue with English text. However, with Arabic,
On 13-5-2010 11:26, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:25:06PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 13-5-2010 10:06, Khaled Hosny wrote:
Nothing special, I always expect interline space to be fixed, I don't
know if TeX always make interline spacing variable, but this wasn't an
issue with
On 13-5-2010 8:34, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Dear Hans,
(I'll answer the rest later)
Did you try to run that with MKII? MKIV works fine (I know that the
title was a bit misleading). I get the characters from font that are
equal to the second byte of UTF-8 representation of input character.
you
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
5.) Weird formula number placement when long equations are used in MKIV
\def\oklepaj#1{\left(#1\right)}
\starttext
\placeformula
\startformula
{\dot N}(t)=
A\oklepaj{\exp\oklepaj{-\frac{t-t_0}{τ_{\text{eksp.-\exp\oklepaj{-\frac{t-t_0}{τ_{\text{fast}+
Hi,
1.) Minimal example:
\usetypescript[iwona]
\setupbodyfont[iwona]
\starttext
$a+b$
\stoptext
Output:
!define font: font with name Iwona-Math-Letters-Regular is not found
!define font: unknown font Iwona-Math-Letters-Regular, loading aborted
!define font: unable to define
On Wed, 12 May 2010, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
7.) I know that there's a longstanding left vs. right bug, but
flushleft is no solution in the following case (compare MKII and MKIV
again):
\definedescription
[latexdesc]
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
10.) Different square root shape/variant used:
$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2πσ_i^2}}$
Original formula:
\startformula
\startcases
\NC ρ_0, \NC for $i=0$, \NR
\NC ρ_i\,\frac{1}{\sqrt{2πσ_i^2}}
\exp\biggl(-\frac{\left(x_j-μ_i\right)^2}{2σ_i^2}\biggr), \NC for
On Wed, 12 May 2010, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
10.) Different square root shape/variant used:
$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2πσ_i^2}}$
Original formula:
\startformula
\startcases
\NC ρ_0, \NC for $i=0$, \NR
\NC ρ_i\,\frac{1}{\sqrt{2πσ_i^2}}
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Wed, 12 May 2010, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
10.) Different square root shape/variant used:
$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2πσ_i^2}}$
Original formula:
\startformula
\startcases
\NC ρ_0, \NC for $i=0$, \NR
\NC ρ_i\,\frac{1}{\sqrt{2πσ_i^2}}
27 matches
Mail list logo
