On 4-6-2011 2:24, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Jun 4, 2011, at 5:06 AM, Hans Hagenpra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 4-6-2011 10:21, R. Ermers wrote:
Adding the prefix cals: to the tag names (thus making the file invalid, which
is contrary to the docbook philosophy), using the cals table module and the
Op 3 jun 2011, om 18:28 heeft Hans Hagen het volgende geschreven:
On 3-6-2011 5:43, R. Ermers wrote:
I tried typesetting docbook with Context, it can be done, I but got stuck on
the cals tables and some other things. Cals tables can be processed, albeit
as separate documents only - not
On 4-6-2011 10:21, R. Ermers wrote:
Adding the prefix cals: to the tag names (thus making the file invalid, which
is contrary to the docbook philosophy), using the cals table module and the
directives is not enough, at least the cals tables in my valid xml docbook
document were never
Op 4 jun 2011, om 11:06 heeft Hans Hagen het volgende geschreven:
On 4-6-2011 10:21, R. Ermers wrote:
Adding the prefix cals: to the tag names (thus making the file invalid,
which is contrary to the docbook philosophy), using the cals table module
and the directives is not enough, at
On Jun 4, 2011, at 5:06 AM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 4-6-2011 10:21, R. Ermers wrote:
Adding the prefix cals: to the tag names (thus making the file invalid,
which is contrary to the docbook philosophy), using the cals table module
and the directives is not enough, at least the
Op 4 jun 2011, om 14:24 heeft Aditya Mahajan het volgende geschreven:
On Jun 4, 2011, at 5:06 AM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 4-6-2011 10:21, R. Ermers wrote:
Adding the prefix cals: to the tag names (thus making the file invalid,
which is contrary to the docbook philosophy),
I tried typesetting docbook with Context, it can be done, I but got stuck on
the cals tables and some other things. Cals tables can be processed, albeit as
separate documents only - not as part of the docbook file - and then imported
as pdf files. This was too cumbersome for me, and does not
On 3-6-2011 5:43, R. Ermers wrote:
I tried typesetting docbook with Context, it can be done, I but got stuck on
the cals tables and some other things. Cals tables can be processed, albeit as
separate documents only - not as part of the docbook file - and then imported
as pdf files. This was
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 11:39:46 +0200
Piotr Kopszak kops...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear list,
I am beginning a rather tedious documentation project
and will most
probably end up with DocBook. The fact is I haven't
used it for any
serious work for about 10 years. Docbook In ConText
haven't been
Many thanks for your reply! I would certainly go this way having a
couple of months or a year perspective. Besides I'm eager to try
finally the new way mkIV deals with xml. But realistically, preparing
and testing a mapping of even a subset of DocBook is a question of at
least a couple of
On 2-6-2011 11:39, Piotr Kopszak wrote:
Dear list,
I am beginning a rather tedious documentation project and will most
probably end up with DocBook. The fact is I haven't used it for any
serious work for about 10 years. Docbook In ConText haven't been
updated since 2003. Does it
On 2-6-2011 12:53, Piotr Kopszak wrote:
Many thanks for your reply! I would certainly go this way having a
couple of months or a year perspective. Besides I'm eager to try
finally the new way mkIV deals with xml. But realistically, preparing
and testing a mapping of even a subset of DocBook is
Hans Hagen pragma at wxs.nl writes:
On 2-6-2011 12:53, Piotr Kopszak wrote:
Many thanks for your reply! I would certainly go this way having a
couple of months or a year perspective. Besides I'm eager to try
finally the new way mkIV deals with xml. But realistically, preparing
and
On 2-6-2011 7:17, Bruce wrote:
Hans Hagenpragmaat wxs.nl writes:
On 2-6-2011 12:53, Piotr Kopszak wrote:
Many thanks for your reply! I would certainly go this way having a
couple of months or a year perspective. Besides I'm eager to try
finally the new way mkIV deals with xml. But
14 matches
Mail list logo
