On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Mohamed Bana wrote:
Hi Aditya,
I've tried compiling your thesis. It failed with;
There were a few modules which were missings from the zip file. I have
created a new zip file with these files. I hope that everything should
compile now.
Hi Aditya,
I've tried compiling your thesis. It failed with;
texmfstart texexec thesis.tex
TeXExec | processing document 'thesis.tex'
TeXExec | no ctx file found
TeXExec | tex processing method: context
TeXExec | TeX run 1
TeXExec | writing option file thesis.top
TeXExec | using randomseed 104
Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
My question to the mailing list: is this task structured? Is this being
managed by anyone?
Unfortunately, not.
Aditya's reply sums it up pretty well. I just want to add a
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 09:05, Piotr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff, would it be allright for You to publish the source of Your very
useful python Endnote-Bibtex conversion program?
I don't mind, but I will have to have a look at it again first, if you
do not mind the little delay. I actually
Dnia Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 04:37:23PM +0200, Taco Hoekwater napisa#322;(a):
Hi,
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
My question to the mailing list: is this task structured? Is this being
managed by anyone?
Unfortunately, not.
Aditya's reply sums
As all the experts have answered your question, let a non-expert join in.
The single frustrating element of context is the documentation. I use context
now for many years (not on a daily basis though) for writing journal papers,
posters, presentations etc. I think it is a great package. and the
Am 22.10.2008 um 09:13 schrieb Stephen A. Tjemkes:
As all the experts have answered your question, let a non-expert
join in.
The single frustrating element of context is the documentation. I
use context now for many years (not on a daily basis though) for
writing journal papers,
Steffen Wolfrum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am 22.10.2008 um 09:13 schrieb Stephen A. Tjemkes:
As all the experts have answered your question, let a non-expert
join in.
The single frustrating element of context is the documentation. I
use context now for many years (not on a daily basis
Hello,
thank You (!) for the many responses - I am surprised about
how many people answered with suggestions, opinions, useful
information and templates.
I think I will give context a try - if it will run on my Vista-64
System. I will check that out in the next day(s). It sounds as a good
Dnia Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 03:05:31PM +0200, Piotr napisa#322;(a):
Hello,
thank You (!) for the many responses - I am surprised about
how many people answered with suggestions, opinions, useful
information and templates.
So you get the feeling of the ConTeXt community;).
Well, sometimes it
On Wednesday 22 October 2008 09:13:20 Stephen A. Tjemkes wrote:
The single frustrating element of context is the documentation. I use
context now for many years (not on a daily basis though) for writing
journal papers, posters, presentations etc. I think it is a great package.
and the
On Wed, Oct 22 2008, John Devereux wrote:
But one thing I still find is that the documentation for a command
(when it exists at all) can list 20 parameters, of which only a couple
are explained. I often still have no idea what the others do. The
meaning may be obvious to typography or tex
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
My question to the mailing list: is this task structured? Is this being
managed by anyone?
Unfortunately, not. Taco started working on the documentation and spent
more than a month rewriting the font documentation. Most of the old manual
is now under
Hi,
I will let the other, more experienced posters answer the bulk of your
questions, as they will do better than I. But about Endnote, which I
happen to use, alongside my own own doctoral dissertation writing
under ConTeXt, I can share some of my experience.
Although Endnote can export into
Am 2008-10-21 um 19:56 schrieb Piotr:
1) Finding the right context
For now I had quite some difficulties to find that proper Latex
distribution - a problem that actually led me to the existence of
ConTeXt. I am wondering which latex distribution I should choose in
order to work with ConTeXt?
2008/10/21 Henning Hraban Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Or lets ask the devils advocate the other way around: What is
the point of installing context, when latex could do the trick? Apart
that I have to re-learn latex anyway.. what is better with Context?
- ConTeXt's scripts know how often your
Dnia Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 07:56:27PM +0200, Piotr napisa#322;(a):
Hello,
I have spent some time with google in order to find an answer to the
following questions. Unfortunatly, I was not satisfied with the
answers, which I now hope to find here.
It is my plan not to use the MS Office
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Piotr wrote:
For now I had quite some difficulties to find that proper Latex
distribution
You only have MikTeX and TeX Live. (I used to be a big MikTeX fan. Not
much difference, but MikTeX is more user friendly for my biased
taste; sadly lacking ConTeXt at the
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Piotr wrote:
Hello,
I have spent some time with google in order to find an answer to the
following questions. Unfortunatly, I was not satisfied with the
answers, which I now hope to find here.
It is my plan not to use the MS Office suite for the production of my
PhD
I wrote my thesis using nroff... wouldn't want to do that again.
Good luck!
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
20 matches
Mail list logo
