Re: [NTG-context] change in treating errors

2019-04-16 Thread Alan Braslau
On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 05:51:00 -0400 Mohammad Hossein Bateni wrote: > 1) You could correct a spelling mistake on the prompt (as in original TeX), > although this is rarely done these days. As you said, doesn't happen. > 2) You could use the --nonstopmode or --batchmode to not get the prompt, >

Re: [NTG-context] change in treating errors

2019-04-16 Thread Hans Hagen
On 4/16/2019 11:51 AM, Mohammad Hossein Bateni wrote: Which one is better is certainly subjective :)  Maybe we could get the old TeX-y behavior via a switch or the other way around? Alan, allow me to disagree with your assertions, though.  Here are a few reasons: 1) You could correct a

Re: [NTG-context] change in treating errors

2019-04-16 Thread Mohammad Hossein Bateni
Which one is better is certainly subjective :) Maybe we could get the old TeX-y behavior via a switch or the other way around? Alan, allow me to disagree with your assertions, though. Here are a few reasons: 1) You could correct a spelling mistake on the prompt (as in original TeX), although

Re: [NTG-context] change in treating errors

2019-04-16 Thread Hans Hagen
On 4/16/2019 6:28 AM, Alan Braslau wrote: On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 23:11:17 -0400 Mohammad Hossein Bateni wrote: Hi, ConTeXt used to recover better from errors. Consider the following file: = \xyz \abc \starttext HELLO \stoptext = Running ConTeXt ver: 2019.03.21

Re: [NTG-context] change in treating errors

2019-04-15 Thread Alan Braslau
On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 23:11:17 -0400 Mohammad Hossein Bateni wrote: > Hi, > > ConTeXt used to recover better from errors. Consider the following file: > > = > \xyz > \abc > > \starttext > HELLO > \stoptext > = > > Running ConTeXt ver: 2019.03.21 21:39 MKIV beta fmt: