Re[2]: [NTG-context] no graph after compilation

2004-08-12 Thread Floris van Manen
>> But unzipping it on top of the texlive was not the very best idea I'd >> guess. EA> EA> I agree... but be aware that in EA> http://contextgarden.net/Linux_Installation this is just what is suggested and precisely what i therefor did :-( % f ___ n

Re[2]: [NTG-context] no graph after compilation

2004-08-12 Thread Floris van Manen
Hi Patrick, PG> But unzipping it on top of the texlive was not the very best idea I'd PG> guess. The directory structure has changed a bit with respect to the PG> location of scripts and metapost files, so your old texlive metafun PG> macros will be used. that is explaining the situation. But for

Re[2]: [NTG-context] no graph after compilation

2004-08-12 Thread Floris van Manen
h. I just want to use context with the metafun and xml features. I don't know if that is minimal enough :-) HH> actually, if you run a minimal tree, you can do a sycn with the HH> tree on out server using texsync, but i have to test that -) via google i found: http://www.pragma-ade.com/general/

Re[2]: [NTG-context] no graph after compilation

2004-08-11 Thread Floris van Manen
PG> There is no way to update this automaticalliy. i think i got lost in the trees... i got the update from pragma-ade.com, unzipped the files in c:\texlive\texmf i did run the texexec --make but i still have texexec 4.0 running... the texexec.exe doesn't seem to find the most recent version. i

Re[2]: [NTG-context] no graph after compilation

2004-08-11 Thread Floris van Manen
i guess it might have to do with the versions of the programs involved. below you see the output of my version and the contextgarden version. i got my LiveTex last week from the web. Any idea how to (automatically) update to the most recent versions? //f = my version:

Re[2]: [NTG-context] no graph after compilation

2004-08-11 Thread Peter Münster
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Floris van Manen wrote: > VZ> Floris, you are not alone. I also have not find the quick solution. So I > VZ> call texexec two times when working with MP graphics, > VZ> color definitions, ... :-( > > running it twice is something i can live with, but if it will not > solve th

Re[2]: [NTG-context] no graph after compilation

2004-08-11 Thread Floris van Manen
>> PG> currentpicture :=nullpicture; >> PG> draw pic scaled 3 ; >> PG> >> PG> clears the first picture. >> >> >> but i only intend to draw one picture... PG> PG> is this a question? Did you try the code? i did, but it has side-effects... it will scale, but the color disappears too. try. -

Re[2]: [NTG-context] no graph after compilation

2004-08-11 Thread Floris van Manen
PG> You should tell metapost to erase the first picture before drawing PG> the second one. So: PG> PG> PG> currentpicture :=nullpicture; PG> draw pic scaled 3 ; PG> PG> clears the first picture. but i only intend to draw one picture... ___ ntg-cont

Re[2]: [NTG-context] no graph after compilation

2004-08-11 Thread Floris van Manen
Hi Patrick, PG> if your TeX source is one file only, please do me a favour: try the PG> TeX files on live.contextgarden.net and see if the output comes out PG> right. If it doesn't, I'd like to know about it. If it does, please PG> report on the list. yes this works great. every change i make is

Re[2]: [NTG-context] no graph after compilation

2004-08-11 Thread Floris van Manen
VZ> Floris, you are not alone. I also have not find the quick solution. So I VZ> call texexec two times when working with MP graphics, VZ> color definitions, ... :-( running it twice is something i can live with, but if it will not solve the problem, then it is... what do i do wrong? //f ___

Re[2]: [NTG-context] no graph after compilation

2004-08-11 Thread Floris van Manen
PR> it seems that you haven't reached page 307 well i did. as far as i understand it, the best way to deal with compiling is to call texexec. and i do get graphics in my pdf, but sometimes i need to do en extra texexec cycle to see the changes come through. and sometimes i don't get anything i