Hans Hagen said this at Wed, 26 Nov 2003 15:58:55 +0100:
>bold math and mixed bold math; only defined for lucida (dunno other bold
>math fonts yet)
Very cool.
I'm trying it with Euler, and it almost works. However, the [size]
typescript finds the namespace too crowded... well, as far as I can t
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> i run a vaniall SuSE 9.0 and have installed: tetex-2.0.2-48
> There is no 'texexec':(
Hello Walter,
tetex is perhaps not enough. Did you install te_cont, te_etex and te_pdf?
Especially te_cont!
Cheers, Peter
--
http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/
I am having a problem with the m-bib module, in that it does not seem to
be handling crossrefs properly. For example, in my bibtex database I have
the following entries:
@inproceedings{ bos92sigs,
author = "Jurjen N. E. Bos and David Chaum",
title = "Provably Unforgeable Signatures",
At 12:55 26/11/2003, Pawel Jackowski na Onet wrote:
Hi all!
I'm working with huge XML documents which are compiled to PDF (with ConTeXt)
and converted to HTML (with XSLT and others). These XML documents contain
references to external files (images). References are mapped to paths with
XML code; i.
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 10:38:52PM +0100, Mikael Persson wrote:
> > can you give a pointer to those fonts?
Windows (type 1 and ttf):
> http://support.wolfram.com/mathematica/systems/windows/general/latestfonts.html
For completeness:
MACINTOSH:
http://support.wolfram.com/mathematica/system
At 09:50 28/11/2003, you wrote:
google tells me pdfetex is something like pdftex (what i have installed)
can i use that ?
indeed, te better one, actually, pdfetex should be on each system that
comes with pdftex
Hans
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMA
hi tobias,
i run a vaniall SuSE 9.0 and have installed: tetex-2.0.2-48
There is no 'texexec':(
ls /usr/bin/tex*
/usr/bin/tex/usr/bin/texdoctk /usr/bin/texhash /usr/bin/texlinks
/usr/bin/texconfig /usr/bin/texfind /usr/bin/texi2pdf /usr/bin/text2sf
/usr/bin/texdoc /usr/bin/
