Re: [NTG-context] color expansion at runtime

2007-12-15 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
2007/12/14, Peter Rolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, I desperately need runtime defined colors (state dependent) for my macros. The macros are used with different graphic styles, which is the reason why I want to avoid any style dependent part inside them. To give you an example. I need something

Re: [NTG-context] new context still hangs on this

2007-12-15 Thread zs
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:50:40 +0100 Peter Münster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You need the trunk-version of luatex, or the next snapshot/beta version. Cheers, Peter You are right, it works now. Thanks Zdenek

Re: [NTG-context] color expansion at runtime

2007-12-15 Thread Peter Rolf
Wolfgang Schuster schrieb: 2007/12/14, Peter Rolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, I desperately need runtime defined colors (state dependent) for my macros. The macros are used with different graphic styles, which is the reason why I want to avoid any style dependent part inside them. To give you

[NTG-context] chapter without number but in table of contents

2007-12-15 Thread Patrick Gundlach
Hi, I know that this must be an faq and I seem to have lost my context knowledge: I'd like to get an unnumbered chapter, but it should appear in the table of contents. This is what I've tried so far: -- \completecontent [alternative=c] \definehead[mychapter][chapter]

Re: [NTG-context] color expansion at runtime

2007-12-15 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
2007/12/15, Peter Rolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Wolfgang Schuster schrieb: 2007/12/14, Peter Rolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, I desperately need runtime defined colors (state dependent) for my macros. The macros are used with different graphic styles, which is the reason why I want to avoid any

Re: [NTG-context] chapter without number but in table of contents

2007-12-15 Thread Patrick Gundlach
Hello Wolfgang, I know that this must be an faq and I seem to have lost my context knowledge: I'd like to get an unnumbered chapter, but it should appear in the table of contents. This is what I've tried so far: -- \completecontent [alternative=c]

Re: [NTG-context] absolute positioning?

2007-12-15 Thread Patrick Gundlach
Hello Wolfgang, What is the current most contextish way for absolute positioning of text (still using MK II)? layers are still the tool of your choice Actually the examples on the wiki were very helpful. Thanks to all, Patrick -- ConTeXt wiki and more: http://contextgarden.net

Re: [NTG-context] chapter without number but in table of contents

2007-12-15 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
Am 2007-12-15 um 17:33 schrieb Patrick Gundlach: \starttext \completecontent [alternative=c] \chapter{chapter1} \chapter{chapter2} \chapter{chapter3} \definehead[mychapter][chapter] \setuphead [mychapter][number=no,incrementnumber=list] \mychapter{chapter4} \stoptext

Re: [NTG-context] ghost in data ?

2007-12-15 Thread Steffen Wolfrum
Am 15.12.2007 um 19:59 schrieb Patrick Gundlach: Hi Steffen, on my machine, viewed with various text-editors the two sym-lines are identical: \starttext \startitemize[width=25mm] \sym{i.\‚V.}in Verbindung% ERROR this ',' is in reality a SINGLE LOW-9 QUOTATION MARK (U+210A) and

Re: [NTG-context] ghost in data ?

2007-12-15 Thread Arthur Reutenauer
\sym{i.\‚V.}in Verbindung% ERROR this ',' is in reality a SINGLE LOW-9 QUOTATION MARK (U+210A) U+201A, of course (the non-ASCII punctuation marks begin at U+2000 -- the General Punctuation block; the 2100 row contains Letterlike Symbol with arrows at the end). Arthur

Re: [NTG-context] ghost in data ?

2007-12-15 Thread Peter Münster
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 08:32:24PM +0100, Steffen Wolfrum wrote: But – Patrick you work on Mac, too – in which editor/application can I actually *see* a difference? Hello Steffen, If you see it or not, depends on the font of the application. I can see a small difference in my email-client

Re: [NTG-context] ghost in data ?

2007-12-15 Thread Patrick Gundlach
Hello Steffen, this ',' is in reality a SINGLE LOW-9 QUOTATION MARK (U+210A) and (thanks Arthur for the correction!) But – Patrick you work on Mac, too – in which editor/application can I actually *see* a difference? Don't ask me. I've used emacs and asked it (C-u C-x =) to get me

Re: [NTG-context] ghost in data ?

2007-12-15 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
Am 2007-12-15 um 20:58 schrieb Patrick Gundlach: But – Patrick you work on Mac, too – in which editor/application can I actually *see* a difference? Don't ask me. I've used emacs and asked it (C-u C-x =) to get me information on the character and it told me the unicode codepoint. I'm on a

Re: [NTG-context] ghost in data ?

2007-12-15 Thread Steffen Wolfrum
Am 15.12.2007 um 20:58 schrieb Patrick Gundlach: Hello Steffen, this ',' is in reality a SINGLE LOW-9 QUOTATION MARK (U+210A) and (thanks Arthur for the correction!) But – Patrick you work on Mac, too – in which editor/application can I actually *see* a difference? ... Another

Re: [NTG-context] ghost in data ?

2007-12-15 Thread Steffen Wolfrum
Am 15.12.2007 um 22:07 schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm: Am 2007-12-15 um 20:58 schrieb Patrick Gundlach: But – Patrick you work on Mac, too – in which editor/application can I actually *see* a difference? Don't ask me. I've used emacs and asked it (C-u C-x =) to get me information on the