Jjgod Jiang wrote:
>
> I just checked out the latest luatex source from svn, with
> the following patch, luatex builds fine on 10.5:
Thank you very much. Patch applied to trunk.
Best wishes,
Taco
___
If your question
Hi Taco,
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> Perhaps not any more in 10.5? Something changed from 10.4 to 10.5 that
> broke luatex's build process. Just the building though, pre-compiled
> binaries work fine. What exactly has changed is a mystery so far.
You're right, I think it has been
On Dec 25, 2007 3:00 AM, Matija Šuklje <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hullo,
>
> I wonder how to generate a PDF with the built-in table of contents. I'm
> thinking in the same line as what 'hyperref' package did in LaTeX.
Did you see
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Table_of_Contents
?
--
luigi
http
Hullo,
I wonder how to generate a PDF with the built-in table of contents. I'm
thinking in the same line as what 'hyperref' package did in LaTeX.
Season's greetings,
Matija
--
gsm: +386 41 849 552
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://matija.suklje.name
aim: hookofsilver
icq: 110183360
jabb
Dne sobota 1. decembra 2007 je George N. White III napisal(a):
> \noheaderandfooterlines
> \setupheadertexts[text][XX][YY]
What is the difference between this method and the
\startstandardmakeup
\stopstandardmakeup
method?
Merry Christmas,
Matija
--
gsm: +386 41 849 552
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT
On Dec 24, 2007, at 3:22 AM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 02:06:12 +0900
Saji N Hameed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear ConText gurus,
I am faced with a new problem with the page numbering in the
Table of Contents. In the appendices, I use:
\setuppagenumbering
[way=bych
Gour wrote:
>
>
> So, something is missing...any pointer for up-to-date doc (url) for
> installing/updating of minimal ConTeXt/luatex on x86_64 ?
Your problem is quite generic. There really is only one executable
built: luatex. 'texlua' and 'texluac' are alternate personalities of
that executab
Jjgod Jiang wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
it on OSX? On linux it's ...
>>> Should'nt this discssion go to the dev-luatex list? :-)
>> But did not CC the list himself. :-)
>>
>> This: http://www.hmug.org/man/2/sigaltstack.php
>>
>> looks like a Mac OS X manual page. How
Hans van der Meer wrote:
> I looked somewhat further and found out the curious fact that on
> MacOSX 10.5.x both /usr/include/signal.h and /usr/include/sys/signal.h
> exist!
That is normal, signals have a portable interface, as defined in
ISO C99. That is the interface provided in /usr/include
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007, Gour wrote:
> 5) I read LaTeX in proper ConTeXt pdf, but I'm interested is there some
> helper to convert classical LaTeX book (book class) to ConTeXt? I've two
> books which I'm considering to publish as one (~1000p) in the future, so
> any help in conversion would be nice
Hello,
I will send a more elaborate mail shortly (with a longer explanation),
but to put it into a few words, I need to know:
a) a rough estimate of the number of people who are planning to come
to Bohinj from 20th-25th August
b) [REALLY IMPORTANT] some preliminary talks held by people with any
k
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 07:43:35 +0100
Gour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 08:39:56 -0700
> "Idris Samawi Hamid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Which is why we need a team :-)
>
> Right. This sounds as reasonable proposal - let every expert writes his/her
> part.
We're too les
Hi!
I'm sold to luatex and plan to use it exclusively for all ConTeXt
typesetting in order to help somewhat with testing it.
However, I've some old lyx/latex stuff which needs to be migrated, so
I'd prefer to keep my texlive installation for such stuff and having
minimal ConTeXt installation to b
Great! amd64 will be much appreciated ... where to get your gpg key from?
Frohes Fest!
Joh
Norbert Preining wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I have updated luatex and context so currently I can even run MkIV
> documents ;-)
>
> Debian/sid users should have them already.
>
> Debian/etch users should ge
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 09:29:26 +0100
Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yes and no ... luatex's interfaces may change, as may some
> functionality (much starts as experiment, is tested, evolves, is
> optimized, etc);
That's understandable, nothing to complain about.
> however, as long as you
I looked somewhat further and found out the curious fact that on
MacOSX 10.5.x both /usr/include/signal.h and /usr/include/sys/signal.h
exist!
The first one does not include the second one, neither does one of the
includes:
#ifndef _USER_SIGNAL_H
#define _USER_SIGNAL_H
#include
#include <_ty
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 23:43:35 -0700, Gour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 08:39:56 -0700
> "Idris Samawi Hamid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Which is why we need a team :-)
>
> Right. This sounds as reasonable proposal - let every expert writes
> his/her part.
>
>> Anyway, as
Gour wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 08:39:56 -0700
> "Idris Samawi Hamid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Which is why we need a team :-)
>
> Right. This sounds as reasonable proposal - let every expert writes his/her
> part.
>
>> Anyway, as soon as luatex/mkiv is relatively stable, the hyperbo
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> Run context with a custom module, which writes the content of each
> \startformula \stopformula into a temporary file as
> \startTEXpage \startformula \stopformula \stopTEXpage. Lilypond
> and gnuplot modules already do something similar. Then process the
> temporary t
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 17:20:41 +0100
Patrick Gundlach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Gour,
>
> I'm the guy who created etexshow.
I recognize your name from the past ;)
> No there is not. I don't use emacs any more (for ConTeXt).
:-(
> I will take a look at texshow.contextgarden.net in the fi
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>>> it on OSX? On linux it's ...
>>
>> Should'nt this discssion go to the dev-luatex list? :-)
>
> But did not CC the list himself. :-)
>
> This: http://www.hmug.org/man/2/sigaltstack.php
>
> looks like a Mac OS X manual page. However, Thomas reported
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 19:29:00 -0500 (EST)
Aditya Mahajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I disagree. I was grately impressed by preview-latex when I tried it
> (around 2 years ago), so much so that I even considered moving to
> emacs from vim. It is extremely useful for mathematics and images:
> you
22 matches
Mail list logo
