Hi Alan,
calm down.
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 9:18 PM, Alan Stone
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> (1) \definefont[myChapterFont][myHeadingsFont sa 1.728]
>>You could either use a real font name like 'Arial' or a symbolic name
>>defined with \definefontsynonym like 'Serif', 'SerifBold', 'Sans',
>>'Dum
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 1:14 AM, Diego Depaoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/7/16 Alan Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [snip]
>> Many thanks in advance for your enlightening help.
>
> For some obscure reason right fontnames are linked with wrong filenames.
> This is the output of
> mtxrun --script
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:30:19 -0400, Alan Bowen wrote:
> I have the latest ConTeXt and am using mkii.
>
> One used to be able to reduce the spacing after an initial by by
> typing “.\”, but this no longer seems to work. Compare the
> inter-word spacing in
>
> \starttext
> A. E. Samuel\crlf
>
I missed...
2008/7/17 Diego Depaoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> You must rename the files (tested, it works
with --lua and --xtx switches
>)
--
Diego Depaoli
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, pleas
2008/7/16 Alan Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[snip]
> Many thanks in advance for your enlightening help.
For some obscure reason right fontnames are linked with wrong filenames.
This is the output of
mtxrun --script fonts --list
on my system
[...]
times new romanTimes New Roma
2008/7/16 Peter Rolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> the results (don't continue to read if you want a happy end):
>
> pdftex 1.40.3 produces a pdf, that shows no side effects when it's
> included by the same version of pdftex (1.40.3).
> if i include that pdf with the current 1.40.9-rc1 i get the wrong col
> (1) \definefont[myChapterFont][myHeadingsFont sa 1.728]
>You could either use a real font name like 'Arial' or a symbolic name
>defined with \definefontsynonym like 'Serif', 'SerifBold', 'Sans',
>'Dummy-Regular' etc. in the second argument of \definefont but not
>the name for a font collection de
Taco Hoekwater schrieb:
>
> Peter Rolf wrote:
>> Taco Hoekwater schrieb:
>>> Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Thanks, for the heads up. The luatex trunk is a bit in flux at the
moment. We are trying to squeeze the previous half year of pdftex and
texlive development into it, and it takes some
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Peter Rolf wrote:
> Mojca Miklavec schrieb:
>>> sure. if someone can point me to the windows binaries of pdftex 1.40.3 i
>>> can test that.
>>
>> Maybe the one from TeX Live 2007?
>> http://www.tug.org/svn/texlive/trunk/Master/bin/win32/pdftex.exe?view=log
>>
>
Mojca Miklavec schrieb:
>> sure. if someone can point me to the windows binaries of pdftex 1.40.3 i
>> can test that.
>
> Maybe the one from TeX Live 2007?
> http://www.tug.org/svn/texlive/trunk/Master/bin/win32/pdftex.exe?view=log
>
one thing left: pdftex.pool is missing (the good old days w
Mojca Miklavec schrieb:
>> sure. if someone can point me to the windows binaries of pdftex 1.40.3 i
>> can test that.
>
> Maybe the one from TeX Live 2007?
> http://www.tug.org/svn/texlive/trunk/Master/bin/win32/pdftex.exe?view=log
>
thank you Mojca (revision 5403).
> Mojca
>
> sure. if someone can point me to the windows binaries of pdftex 1.40.3 i
> can test that.
Maybe the one from TeX Live 2007?
http://www.tug.org/svn/texlive/trunk/Master/bin/win32/pdftex.exe?view=log
Mojca
___
If
Taco Hoekwater schrieb:
>
> Peter Rolf wrote:
>> Taco Hoekwater schrieb:
>>> Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Thanks, for the heads up. The luatex trunk is a bit in flux at the
moment. We are trying to squeeze the previous half year of pdftex and
texlive development into it, and it takes some
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Mojca Miklavec
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Willi Egger wrote:
>>> Hi LUA-users,
>>>
>>>
>>> Yesterday I installed a complete new set of minimals on my MAC (OSX
>>> 10.4).
>>>
>>> Now I get very strange
( 2nd and last attempt: message didn't get through )
Thanks a lot Wolfgang. There's still something I don't understand though...
Why does this not compile then ?
\setuppapersize [A4][A4]
\starttypescript [serif] [myBodyFont]
\definefontsynonym [myBodyFontRegular] [name:Times New R
Hello,
indeed, that was the problem in MKIV. - Though this runs really fast,
it is to adopt a new attitude! ;-)
Willi
On Jul 16, 2008, at 4:38 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>
>
> Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Willi Egger wrote:
>>> Hi LUA-users,
>>>
>>>
>>> Yesterday I
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>
> Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Willi Egger wrote:
>>> Hi LUA-users,
>>>
>>>
>>> Yesterday I installed a complete new set of minimals on my MAC (OSX
>>> 10.4).
>>>
>>> Now I get very strange results wit MATPOST. The file compiled
>>> contains a l
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Willi Egger wrote:
>> Hi LUA-users,
>>
>>
>> Yesterday I installed a complete new set of minimals on my MAC (OSX
>> 10.4).
>>
>> Now I get very strange results wit MATPOST. The file compiled
>> contains a large definition which is used as a
Peter Rolf wrote:
> Taco Hoekwater schrieb:
>> Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>>> Thanks, for the heads up. The luatex trunk is a bit in flux at the
>>> moment. We are trying to squeeze the previous half year of pdftex and
>>> texlive development into it, and it takes some effort.
>> For the repository us
Aditya Mahajan schrieb:
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Peter Rolf wrote:
>
>> i have 'diff-ed' the versions, but couldn't find any obvious flaw.
>> also tested with different luatex binaries. same result.
>
> Did you also try it on cmd.exe? I recall that sometimes windows ruby had
> problems with file p
Taco Hoekwater schrieb:
>
> Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>> Thanks, for the heads up. The luatex trunk is a bit in flux at the
>> moment. We are trying to squeeze the previous half year of pdftex and
>> texlive development into it, and it takes some effort.
>
> For the repository users of luatex: The tr
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Peter Rolf wrote:
> i have 'diff-ed' the versions, but couldn't find any obvious flaw.
> also tested with different luatex binaries. same result.
Did you also try it on cmd.exe? I recall that sometimes windows ruby had
problems with file paths in cygwin.
Aditya
Hi Wolfgang,
Thanks for your reply. I tried your suggestions, but unfortunately
none of the versions gives oldstyle nor small caps. ;-(
Kind regards
Willi
On Jul 16, 2008, at 2:56 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:48 PM, Willi Egger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Willi Egger wrote:
>> Hi LUA-users,
>>
>>
>> Yesterday I installed a complete new set of minimals on my MAC (OSX
>> 10.4).
>>
>> Now I get very strange results wit MATPOST. The file compiled
>> contains a large definition which is used as a
Hi Mojca,
thanks for your immediate reply. - Because I have still an older
version running here, I do not depend on immediate repair. - Anyway I
believe there will soon be a new version of MPlib though.
Kind regards
Wiilli
On Jul 16, 2008, at 2:55 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16,
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Willi Egger wrote:
> Hi LUA-users,
>
>
> Yesterday I installed a complete new set of minimals on my MAC (OSX
> 10.4).
>
> Now I get very strange results wit MATPOST. The file compiled
> contains a large definition which is used as an inclusion to produce
> a series
Thank's both of you.
Exactly what I was looking for.
Olivier.
--
[Message tapé sur un clavier Bépo : http://www.clavier-dvorak.org ]
http://nemolivier.blogspot.com
___
If your question is of interest to others as w
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Peter Münster wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16 2008, Olivier Guéry wrote:
In the same idear, i realy miss something to highlight the « overfull hbox »
\version[temporary]
\starttext
\hsize1pt
abcd
\stoptext
Sometimes, you do not want \version[temporary]. In those cases, I usually
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 1:16 PM, John Culleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Per the Chicago Manual of Style divider pages and their blank versos
> do not show page numbers but are included in the page count, just
> like any other pages. However the \part macro excludes them from the
> page number
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Mojca Miklavec
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Willi Egger wrote:
>> Hi LUA-users,
>>
>>
>> Yesterday I installed a complete new set of minimals on my MAC (OSX
>> 10.4).
>>
>> Now I get very strange results wit MATPOST. The file compile
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:48 PM, Willi Egger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to use fontfeatures contained in my new otf-font Seravek.
>
> I am getting Seravek in the file but no way to activate the oldstyle
> figures and the small caps. :-(
>
> Can someone give m a clue?
>
> Willi
Hans Hagen schrieb:
> Peter Rolf wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> i'm currently running the context beta from 07.07.2008 with the windows
>> minimals from 10.07.2008. all my (quick) tries to update to a later beta
>> version have failed.
>>
>> my main problem is, that luatools.lua doesn't work properly any mor
Hi,
I am trying to use fontfeatures contained in my new otf-font Seravek.
I am getting Seravek in the file but no way to activate the oldstyle
figures and the small caps. :-(
Can someone give m a clue?
Willi
I got until now the following typescript:
% \definefontfeature
% [OldstyleF
Hi LUA-users,
Yesterday I installed a complete new set of minimals on my MAC (OSX
10.4).
Now I get very strange results wit MATPOST. The file compiled
contains a large definition which is used as an inclusion to produce
a series of similar drawings with different parameters. When
compili
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>
> Thanks, for the heads up. The luatex trunk is a bit in flux at the
> moment. We are trying to squeeze the previous half year of pdftex and
> texlive development into it, and it takes some effort.
For the repository users of luatex: The trunk seems to be
compiling and r
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:42 AM, Diego Depaoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/7/15 Andrea Valle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> So, I'm testing with the type-doulos.tex file containg this
>> \starttypescript [serif] [doulos]
>> \setups[font:fallback:roman]
>> \definefontsynonym [Serif] [Doulos SIL]
>> \
Per the Chicago Manual of Style divider pages and their blank versos
do not show page numbers but are included in the page count, just
like any other pages. However the \part macro excludes them from the
page numbering sequence altogether. And my current customer at least
wants roman rather
On Wed, Jul 16 2008, Olivier Guéry wrote:
> In the same idear, i realy miss something to highlight the « overfull hbox »
\version[temporary]
\starttext
\hsize1pt
abcd
\stoptext
Cheers, Peter
--
http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/
__
Peter Rolf wrote:
> hi,
>
> i'm currently running the context beta from 07.07.2008 with the windows
> minimals from 10.07.2008. all my (quick) tries to update to a later beta
> version have failed.
>
> my main problem is, that luatools.lua doesn't work properly any more;
> if i start 'luatools -
(resend: didn't get through yesterday)
Thanks a lot Wolfgang.
There's still something I don't understand...
Why does this not compile then: see the (new) attachements ?
Alan
test.tex
Description: Binary data
test.log
Description: Binary data
_
2008/7/15 John Devereux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to automatically "highlight changes" to a document,
> such that the resulting PDF has markers showing changed areas? Bars in
> the margin or some such. Or more generally some other way to easily
> communicate what has been chan
hi,
i'm currently running the context beta from 07.07.2008 with the windows
minimals from 10.07.2008. all my (quick) tries to update to a later beta
version have failed.
my main problem is, that luatools.lua doesn't work properly any more;
if i start 'luatools --generate' inside eshell (zshell c
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>
> How about redefining \docite as follows
>
> ...
> This way, it will be possible to change the color and style of references
> when interaction is on using
>
> \setupcite[color=darkgreen,style=normal]
>
> What do you think?
Sure, can do.
Ah, grazie Diego
it works here too (and, too, I don't know why :) ).
Best
-a-
On 16 Jul 2008, at 02:42, Diego Depaoli wrote:
2008/7/15 Andrea Valle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
So, I'm testing with the type-doulos.tex file containg this
\starttypescript [serif] [doulos]
\setups[font:fallback:roman]
44 matches
Mail list logo
