On Thursday 27 November 2008 14:00, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
> Am 27.11.2008 um 21:43 schrieb Bart C. Wise:
> > Thanks Wolfgang.
> >
> > I looked at Taco's diff file and changed the routines in syst-lua.lua.
> > However, I followed you're lead and changed core-job.lua and it
> > works! Yes
> > the
Am 27.11.2008 um 21:43 schrieb Bart C. Wise:
> Thanks Wolfgang.
>
> I looked at Taco's diff file and changed the routines in syst-lua.lua.
> However, I followed you're lead and changed core-job.lua and it
> works! Yes
> the footnotes come out.
>
> New problem (also happens on MkII), if there a
Thanks Wolfgang.
I looked at Taco's diff file and changed the routines in syst-lua.lua.
However, I followed you're lead and changed core-job.lua and it works! Yes
the footnotes come out.
New problem (also happens on MkII), if there are a lot of end notes, instead
of going to the next page af
Am 27.11.2008 um 20:44 schrieb Bart C. Wise:
> Hans,
>
> I tried the changes, but now footnotes do not appear at all!
>
> Here's a copy of the code that I used (combining both Hans' and
> Taco's changes
> -- although I tried several variants).
>
> local s = lpeg.Ct(lpeg.splitat(","))
> local h
Hans,
I tried the changes, but now footnotes do not appear at all!
Here's a copy of the code that I used (combining both Hans' and Taco's changes
-- although I tried several variants).
local s = lpeg.Ct(lpeg.splitat(","))
local h = { }
function commands.doifcommonelse(a,b)
local ha = h
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>
> Bart C. Wise wrote:
>> Hans,
>>
>> What's the chances on getting this fixed?
>
> This is the bug:
>
> --- syst-lua.lua.orig 2008-11-27 10:39:58.396303891 +0100
> +++ syst-lua.lua2008-11-27 10:40:02.063303374 +0100
> @@ -46,8 +46,8 @@
> function commands.doi
Bart C. Wise wrote:
> Hans,
>
> What's the chances on getting this fixed?
This is the bug:
--- syst-lua.lua.orig 2008-11-27 10:39:58.396303891 +0100
+++ syst-lua.lua2008-11-27 10:40:02.063303374 +0100
@@ -46,8 +46,8 @@
function commands.doifcommonelse(a,b)
local ha = h[a]
Hans,
What's the chances on getting this fixed? Or is there a stable branch
somewhere that I can grab?
Thanks!
Bart
On Tuesday 25 November 2008 11:47:38 am Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
> Am 25.11.2008 um 19:39 schrieb Bart C. Wise:
> > Below are four different ways I've tried to get endnotes to wo
Am 25.11.2008 um 19:39 schrieb Bart C. Wise:
> Below are four different ways I've tried to get endnotes to work.
> When I
> compile with "texexec" it work fine --- I get endnotes. However,
> when I
> compile with "texexec --lua" the footnotes are placed on the page
> where they
> are refe
Below are four different ways I've tried to get endnotes to work. When I
compile with "texexec" it work fine --- I get endnotes. However, when I
compile with "texexec --lua" the footnotes are placed on the page where they
are referenced. I would prefer to have the footnote/placefootnotes work
I've tried several things to get end notes working with the Minimals
distribution (MkIV). However, nothing seems to work and what worked for MkII
does not work now. Is there a new method for getting end notes in MkIV?
Thank,
Bart
11 matches
Mail list logo