On Tue, 22 Mar 2011, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011, Hans Hagen wrote:
so i changed it a bit in the next beta .. i also made middle the default
location
Thank you. I will document all this in the next TUGBoat article on "Context
for users".
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/PaperSet
2011/3/22 Aditya Mahajan
> well, it works if one specifies [A5][samesize]
>
> Yes, but [A5][A5] is simpler than [A5][samesize] :)
With the former if the size changes to A6, you only have to change one
thing. So in light of maintenance it is better.
--
Cecil Westerhof
_
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 21-3-2011 5:08, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 21.03.2011 um 00:43 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
About two months back I had requested that the second argument be made
optional. Hans had implemented that request, but it does not always work
(I don't know if
On 21-3-2011 5:08, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 21.03.2011 um 00:43 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
About two months back I had requested that the second argument be made
optional. Hans had implemented that request, but it does not always work (I
don't know if this is a regression over the original i
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 21.03.2011 um 00:43 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
About two months back I had requested that the second argument be made
optional. Hans had implemented that request, but it does not always work (I
don't know if this is a regression over the origina
Am 21.03.2011 um 00:43 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
> About two months back I had requested that the second argument be made
> optional. Hans had implemented that request, but it does not always work (I
> don't know if this is a regression over the original implemenetation, or it
> never worked cor
dont
get the desired size by using only one argument. +1 for change.
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Aditya Mahajan [mailto:adit...@umich.edu]
> Gesendet: Montag, 21. März 2011 00:43
> An: mailing list for ConTeXt users
> Betreff: Re: [NTG-context] Feature request: setup
Hi Aditya,Testing your minimal example:\setuppapersize[A5] \showframe\starttext\dorecurse{10}{\input knuth \endgraf}\stoptextit seems that I do get an A5 papersize (ConTeXt version 2011.02.25 22:03, and LuaTeX, Version beta-0.65.0-2010121316). I attach the PDF file for your information (since I don
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, C. wrote:
Did you try \setuppapersize[A5][A5] ?
According to http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Reference/en/setuppapersize
second argument (the print paper size) is A4 by default.
About two months back I had requested that the second argument be made
optional. Hans had implem
8:59
> An: mailing list for ConTeXt users
> Betreff: Re: [NTG-context] Feature request: setuppapersize
>
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, Hans Hagen wrote:
> >
> >> more elegant and downward compatible is this:
> >&
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, Hans Hagen wrote:
more elegant and downward compatible is this:
\definepapersize
[samesized]
[ \c!width=\paperwidth,
\c!height=\paperheight]
\setuppapersize
[A4][samesized]
in page-lay.mkiv
Indeed. This will also work fi
On 22-1-2011 5:34, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, Hans Hagen wrote:
more elegant and downward compatible is this:
\definepapersize
[samesized]
[ \c!width=\paperwidth,
\c!height=\paperheight]
\setuppapersize
[A4][samesized]
in page-lay.mkiv
Can this also be added to page-lay.mki
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, Hans Hagen wrote:
more elegant and downward compatible is this:
\definepapersize
[samesized]
[ \c!width=\paperwidth,
\c!height=\paperheight]
\setuppapersize
[A4][samesized]
in page-lay.mkiv
Can this also be added to page-lay.mkii. Will make it much easier to
docum
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, Hans Hagen wrote:
more elegant and downward compatible is this:
\definepapersize
[samesized]
[ \c!width=\paperwidth,
\c!height=\paperheight]
\setuppapersize
[A4][samesized]
in page-lay.mkiv
Indeed. This will also work fine.
Thanks,
Aditya
_
Hans Hagen writes:
> \setuppapersize
> [A4][samesized]
Not really an improvement over \setuppapersize[A4][A4] ...
>>>
> i guess you didn't try it as suggested ... when set up this way the second
> argument defaults to samesize unless set otherwise
Right! I thought the \setu
On 10-1-2011 4:20, Peter Münster wrote:
Hans Hagen writes:
On 10-1-2011 3:04, Peter Münster wrote:
Hans Hagen writes:
What do you think?
\setuppapersize
[A4][samesized]
Not really an improvement over \setuppapersize[A4][A4] ...
why not?
Just my personal opinion: more keystroke
Hans Hagen writes:
> On 10-1-2011 3:04, Peter Münster wrote:
>> Hans Hagen writes:
>>
What do you think?
>>>
>>> \setuppapersize
>>>[A4][samesized]
>>
>> Not really an improvement over \setuppapersize[A4][A4] ...
>
> why not?
Just my personal opinion: more keystrokes to type and more o
On 10-1-2011 3:04, Peter Münster wrote:
Hans Hagen writes:
What do you think?
\setuppapersize
[A4][samesized]
Not really an improvement over \setuppapersize[A4][A4] ...
why not?
-
Hans Hagen writes:
>> What do you think?
>
> \setuppapersize
> [A4][samesized]
Not really an improvement over \setuppapersize[A4][A4] ...
--
Peter Münster
Contact information: http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/
___
If
On 9-1-2011 12:45, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Hans,
Since we have some leverage with backward compatibility in MkIV, can we
make \setuppapersize (slightly) more intuitive.
Normally, one would expect
\setuppapersize[A5]
to be equivalent to
\setuppapersize[A5][A5]
but currently it is equivalent to
Hans,
Since we have some leverage with backward compatibility in MkIV, can we
make \setuppapersize (slightly) more intuitive.
Normally, one would expect
\setuppapersize[A5]
to be equivalent to
\setuppapersize[A5][A5]
but currently it is equivalent to
\setuppapersize[A5][A4]
This
21 matches
Mail list logo
