Re: [NTG-context] Re: Choosing an encoding - what are the consequences?

2005-02-18 Thread Hans Hagen
Stefan Wachter wrote:
Adam Lindsay wrote:
  Okay, as far as I know, ConTeXt doesn't have an 8a/Adobe encoding vector
  defined yet.
What does it mean that ConTeXt doesn't have an 8a/Adobe encoding vector? 
Isn't it enough for ConTeXt that there is an 8a.enc file? (I am prepared 
to write the necessary typescripts myself.)
you need to write an enco-ase file then; no reason for typescripts
Yet, the results were in some way unexpected. It seems that the 8a 
encoding really isn't supported by ConTeXt. For example if I say

\setupencoding[default=8a]
and output the character \char251
then I get a ß in the resulting PDF. I am very astonished to receive 
that character because in 8a, T1, and texnansi encoding the glyph 
/ucircumflex is located at that slot.

Maybe this has to do with virtual fonts? I still struggle with all these 
matters.
no, just make me an enco-ase (adobe standard encoding) file; you can use 
enco-ans as starting point

Hans
-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
 tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
 | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


[NTG-context] Re: Choosing an encoding - what are the consequences?

2005-02-17 Thread Stefan Wachter
Adam Lindsay wrote:
 Okay, as far as I know, ConTeXt doesn't have an 8a/Adobe encoding vector
 defined yet.
What does it mean that ConTeXt doesn't have an 8a/Adobe encoding vector? 
Isn't it enough for ConTeXt that there is an 8a.enc file? (I am prepared 
to write the necessary typescripts myself.)



2. Can I ommit the 8a encoding in map files when PDF documents are
generated (because it is the Adobe standard encoding)?


 Dunno. But it's worth finding out! :)
I installed the Adobe Helvetica fonts in 8a encoding using texfont. Then 
I removed the download instructions in the generated map files. After 
that I could generate PDF documents that are rather minimal: no fonts or 
encodings were embedded.

Yet, the results were in some way unexpected. It seems that the 8a 
encoding really isn't supported by ConTeXt. For example if I say

\setupencoding[default=8a]
and output the character \char251
then I get a ß in the resulting PDF. I am very astonished to receive 
that character because in 8a, T1, and texnansi encoding the glyph 
/ucircumflex is located at that slot.

Maybe this has to do with virtual fonts? I still struggle with all these 
matters.

1. The afm2tfm tool allows to set two different encodings: -p ps-enc 
and -t tex-enc whereas texfont offers only one encoding. Does texfont 
use the same encoding for the ps-enc and the tex-enc?

2. What is the meansing of the ps-enc and the tex-enc, respectively?
Can anyone help with these questions?
--Stefan
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context