Mojca Miklavec wrote:
The problem with verbatim ... etex is that you somehow preprocess it
or I don't know what you do with it. So if one writes
it's normally expanded, but with regards to passing environments, there
is hardly any expansion involved; also, when i set it from within
On 2/15/06, Renaud AUBIN wrote:
Ok it is \setupGNUPLOT[method=mp,option=hlhr8r] but now
how to deal with math like $\vec{x}$ ?
I don't have lucida, but how about this:
http://pub.mojca.org/gnuplot/sample/document.pdf?
(You can play with the source and files in other dicerctories as well,
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
It's very easy to fix gnuplot, so that it will be able to place
additional commands inside verbatimtex section. If anyone needs
that, I can add it and submit it to patches, but I can only provide
you windows binaries after that. (I tried to compile it on three linux
On 2/16/06, Renaud AUBIN wrote:
Hi all,
This time, I eventually use LaTeX with \usepackage{lucidabr} and set term
pst to produce .ps, then use ps2epsi to obtain an .eps with a correct
bounding box and to finish psttopdf. I include the resulting .pdf with the
standard method... It is not
Hi all,
This time, I eventually use LaTeX with \usepackage{lucidabr} and "set
term pst" to produce .ps, then use ps2epsi to obtain an .eps with a
correct bounding box and to finish psttopdf. I include the resulting
.pdf with the standard method... It is not the easy way !
Now, considering
Adam Lindsay wrote:
Hans Hagen wrote:
what is this hlhr8r? a font filename?
Yes, one of the Lucida ones.
()when installing lbr using texfont, did you (manually) move the math pfb
files and tfm files?
(maybe i should distribute the lbr math tfm files)
Or, maybe I
Hans Hagen wrote:
Adam Lindsay wrote:
Hans Hagen wrote:
what is this hlhr8r? a font filename?
Yes, one of the Lucida ones.
()when installing lbr using texfont, did you (manually) move the math pfb
files and tfm files?
(maybe i should distribute the lbr math tfm files)
On 2/15/06, Renaud AUBIN wrote:
I'm trying to use the gnuplot mode (texlive+ ConTeXt 2006.02.03) and the
command texexec --pdf --mode=demo m-gnuplot results in a m-gnuplot.pdf where
only the png is correctly displayed... All the m-gnuplot-gnuplot-*.pdf are
unknown...
I assume I have
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
It depends on terminal. With PostScript terminal you can't do math.
With Metapost you can do math, but don't ask me how to change fonts to
lucida (try read help terminal mp if it helps you). Anyway I'm
affraid that you won't get lucida for math that way.
if with mp
Hi all,
I'm trying to use the gnuplot mode (texlive+ ConTeXt 2006.02.03) and
the command texexec --pdf --mode=demo m-gnuplot results in a
m-gnuplot.pdf where only the png is correctly displayed... All the
m-gnuplot-gnuplot-*.pdf are unknown...
I assume I have missed something... But what ?
Renaud AUBIN wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to use the gnuplot mode (texlive+ ConTeXt 2006.02.03) and the
command texexec --pdf --mode=demo m-gnuplot results in a m-gnuplot.pdf
where only the png is correctly displayed... All the
m-gnuplot-gnuplot-*.pdf are unknown...
I assume I have
Hi Taco, happy to read you again :-) !
I don't have texmfstart. It is a win script, isn't it ? I have a debian
box. Maybe I have to do some hacks in m-gnuplot.
I have try ruby
/usr/local/texlive/2005/texmf-dist/scripts/context/ruby/newpstopdf.rb
--method=raw m-gnuplot-gnuplot-1.ps and it
Renaud AUBIN wrote:
Hi Taco, happy to read you again :-) !
I don't have texmfstart. It is a win script, isn't it ? I have a debian
box. Maybe I have to do some hacks in m-gnuplot.
I have try ruby
/usr/local/texlive/2005/texmf-dist/scripts/context/ruby/newpstopdf.rb
--method=raw
Hi Hans,
texmfstart is a ruby script (in scritps/context/ruby); Normally there
should be a copy without suffix in some bin path
No... I have put a copy in /usr/local/bin and texexec --pdf --mode=demo
m-gnuplot works now.
depends on how you installed the lucidas's
texfont
depends on how you installed the lucidas's
texfont --en=ec --ve=bh
--co=lucida --in --ma
Ok it is \setupGNUPLOT[method=mp,option="hlhr8r"] but now how to deal
with math like $\vec{x}$ ?
___
ntg-context mailing list
Renaud AUBIN wrote:
Hi Hans,
texmfstart is a ruby script (in scritps/context/ruby); Normally there
should be a copy without suffix in some bin path
No... I have put a copy in /usr/local/bin and texexec --pdf
--mode=demo m-gnuplot works now.
depends on how you installed the lucidas's
could you process the produced texnansi-bh-lucida file? if so, lucida should work ok
Do you mean \loadmapfile[texansi-bh-lucida.map] ? If so, I already use
\loadmapfile[ec-bh-lucida.map] (Lucida works well for my document) and
according to http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Gnuplot
Renaud AUBIN wrote:
could you process the produced texnansi-bh-lucida file? if so, lucida should
work ok
Do you mean \loadmapfile[texansi-bh-lucida.map] ? If so, I already use
\loadmapfile[ec-bh-lucida.map] (Lucida works well for my document) and
according to
what is this hlhr8r? a font filename?
hlhr8r -
/usr/local/texlive/2005/texmf-dist/fonts/tfm/bh/lucida/hlhr8r.tfm
It sets the metapost's defaultfont but maybe there is another method
than give a .tfm file I don't know.
()when installing lbr using texfont, did you (manually) move
Hans Hagen wrote:
what is this hlhr8r? a font filename?
Yes, one of the Lucida ones.
()when installing lbr using texfont, did you (manually) move the math pfb
files and tfm files?
(maybe i should distribute the lbr math tfm files)
Or, maybe I should finish that type-dis typescript to
20 matches
Mail list logo
