Re: [NTG-context] latest beta problem (minimals)

2009-05-29 Thread Bowen Alan C.
That’s got it. Many thanks! Alan On May 29, 2009, at 17;35,03 , Hans Hagen wrote: Bowen Alan C. wrote: The installation process is interrupted by report I can't find file `core-dat.tex'. i'll fix it; in contex.mkii remove the line that loads it

[NTG-context] latest beta, xp interface

2009-04-07 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
Hi all, is this a known problem with interface=xp? If so, sorry for the noise... \starttext This is \pagenumber\ of \lastpage \page This is \pagenumber\ of \lastpage \stoptext All best Thomas ___ If your

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta, xp interface

2009-04-07 Thread Hans Hagen
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: Hi all, is this a known problem with interface=xp? If so, sorry for the noise... \starttext This is \pagenumber\ of \lastpage \page This is \pagenumber\ of \lastpage \stoptext the next beta will be the merged xp version; so just collect bugs and we'll sort them

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta (MKII/Greek module)

2009-03-22 Thread Hans Hagen
Bowen Alan C. wrote: I am finding that the latest beta fails when asked to set ancient Greek using Thomas’ module and the MKII engine. The error message reads: ! Missing \endcsname inserted. to be read again \@@laagrpatterns i need a small test file ... (there has been

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta (MKII/Greek module)

2009-03-22 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On Mar 22, 2009, at 3:38 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: i need a small test file ... It doesn't get smaller than that: :-) \starttext \language[ancientgreek] Hello World! \stoptext Thomas ___ If your question is of

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta (MKII/Greek module)

2009-03-22 Thread Hans Hagen
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: On Mar 22, 2009, at 3:38 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: i need a small test file ... It doesn't get smaller than that: :-) \starttext \language[ancientgreek] Hello World! \stoptext ok, new beta for testing

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta (MKII/Greek module)

2009-03-22 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On Mar 22, 2009, at 4:56 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: ok, new beta for testing Works here! Thanks Thomas ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist :

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta (MKII/Greek module)

2009-03-22 Thread Bowen Alan C.
Thanks, Hans and Thomas! Alan On Mar 22, 2009, at 12;22,27 , Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: On Mar 22, 2009, at 4:56 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: ok, new beta for testing Works here! Thanks Thomas ___ If your question

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta - Math error

2009-03-03 Thread Hans Hagen
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: On Mar 2, 2009, at 11:32 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: does this work at your end? \starttext $\approx$ \stoptext Yes, unfortunately it does... strange, since it works ok here; maybe deleting the font cache helps Hans

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta - Math error

2009-03-03 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Hans Hagen wrote: Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: On Mar 2, 2009, at 11:32 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: does this work at your end? \starttext $\approx$ \stoptext Yes, unfortunately it does... strange, since it works ok here; maybe deleting the font cache helps If both work, then maybe the

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta - Math error

2009-03-03 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On Mar 3, 2009, at 9:09 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: Yes, unfortunately it does... strange, since it works ok here; maybe deleting the font cache helps I meant, unfortunately it does work since this made finding the error much harder... Anyway, I have now found a minimal file that shows one

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta - Math error

2009-03-03 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Thomas A. Schmitz thomas.schm...@uni-bonn.de wrote: Anyway, I have now found a minimal file that shows one error. I couldn't make the error appear with a buffer, only when I had xml + environment file. A ConTeXt version of the filecontents for LaTeX would be

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta - Math error

2009-03-03 Thread Hans Hagen
Wolfgang Schuster wrote: On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Thomas A. Schmitz thomas.schm...@uni-bonn.de wrote: Anyway, I have now found a minimal file that shows one error. I couldn't make the error appear with a buffer, only when I had xml + environment file. so ... what is the test file

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta - Math error

2009-03-03 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 03.03.2009 um 12:23 schrieb Hans Hagen: A ConTeXt version of the filecontents for LaTeX would be handy in such cases. i have no clue what this means Thomas was unable to show his problem with a buffer, the filecontents environment is like a buffer but writes the content to a file with

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta - Math error

2009-03-02 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On Mar 2, 2009, at 11:32 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: does this work at your end? \starttext $\approx$ \stoptext Yes, unfortunately it does... Thomas ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add

[NTG-context] latest beta

2009-02-05 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
Hi, with the latest beta of this morning and the latest luatex, a call like texexec --lua --env=mystyle myfile.xml fails, the environment file is not read (there is no error about not finding it in the log). Thomas

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta

2009-02-05 Thread Hans Hagen
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: Hi, with the latest beta of this morning and the latest luatex, a call like texexec --lua --env=mystyle myfile.xml fails, the environment file is not read (there is no error about not finding it in the log). ah .. in core-def.tex ... \appendtoks

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta

2009-02-05 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On Feb 5, 2009, at 4:25 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: ah .. in core-def.tex ... \appendtoks \directsetup{*runtime:modules}\to \everyjob 's' missing in modules OK, but now I get: ! LuaTeX error main ctx instance:1: attempt to index global 'ptbs' (a nil value) stack traceback:

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta

2009-02-05 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 05.02.2009 um 16:47 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz: On Feb 5, 2009, at 4:25 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: ah .. in core-def.tex ... \appendtoks \directsetup{*runtime:modules}\to \everyjob 's' missing in modules OK, but now I get: [...] l.330 \xmlprocess{main}{\inputfilename}{} Do

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta

2009-02-05 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On Feb 5, 2009, at 5:19 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Do you use the last LuaTeX version? I tried a example you send me and it works without problems. This is LuaTeX, Version snapshot-0.33.1-2009020413, build unknown Wolfgang This is LuaTeX, Version snapshot-0.33.1-2009020508, build 1856

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta

2009-02-05 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On Feb 5, 2009, at 5:36 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: This is LuaTeX, Version snapshot-0.33.1-2009020508, build 1856 I'll try with an older version of luatex, maybe the trunk version (which I compiled today) has a problem. Thomas Nope, I get exactly the same error with luatex 0.33.0; not

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta

2009-02-05 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On Feb 5, 2009, at 5:59 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: Nope, I get exactly the same error with luatex 0.33.0; not with all of my xml files, however. I'll have to see if I can isolate the error. Thanks for your reply, Wolfgang. Best Thomas OK, one problem is math support. Here's a minimal

[NTG-context] latest beta

2008-11-06 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
Hi all, Hi Hans, has anything changed in xml processing in the latest beta? My beautiful (!) collection of xml entities has stopped working. In my environment files, I have stuff such as \defineXMLentity[textellipsis]{\textellipsis} but only get the typeset textellipsis in my pdfs when I

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta

2008-11-06 Thread Hans Hagen
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: Hi all, Hi Hans, has anything changed in xml processing in the latest beta? My beautiful (!) collection of xml entities has stopped working. In my environment files, I have stuff such as \defineXMLentity[textellipsis]{\textellipsis} but only get the typeset

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta

2008-11-06 Thread Hans Hagen
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: On Nov 6, 2008, at 1:26 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: so, how about a test file ... Yes we can! Here comes: you mean http://www.trouw.nl/redactie/spotprent/woensdag160.gif -) Hans -

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta

2008-11-06 Thread luigi scarso
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Nov 6, 2008, at 1:26 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: so, how about a test file ... Yes we can! Here comes: \startxmlsetups mytest \xmlsetsetup{main}{document|p}{*} \stopxmlsetups \xmlregistersetup{mytest}

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta

2008-11-06 Thread Hans Hagen
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: On Nov 6, 2008, at 1:26 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: so, how about a test file ... Yes we can! Here comes Somehow I could ... new beta ... \setupxml[entities=mkii] pA textbar; B shorta; C dotlessi; D adiaeresis; E/p seems to work ok

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta

2008-11-06 Thread luigi scarso
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: On Nov 6, 2008, at 1:26 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: so, how about a test file ... Yes we can! Here comes Somehow I could ... new beta ... \setupxml[entities=mkii] pA textbar; B shorta; C

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta

2008-11-06 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On Nov 6, 2008, at 7:46 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: On Nov 6, 2008, at 1:26 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: so, how about a test file ... Yes we can! Here comes Somehow I could ... new beta ... Yes, this looks much better - my entities are processed again! Thanks Hans!

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta

2008-11-06 Thread Hans Hagen
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: On Nov 6, 2008, at 7:46 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: On Nov 6, 2008, at 1:26 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: so, how about a test file ... Yes we can! Here comes Somehow I could ... new beta ... Yes, this looks much better - my entities are processed

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta (again)

2008-10-09 Thread Hans Hagen
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: Hans, I still have some problems with my fonts in the latest beta. Maybe it has to do with the latest optimizations. I'm just wondering: in my Greek typescripts, I define several fontfeatures and connect them with featurefiles, like so (just an example, the

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta (again)

2008-10-09 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On Oct 9, 2008, at 11:22 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: hard to test without test files and fonts -) Yes, I can see that :-) Your crystal ball is broken, then? you can try \ctxlua{fonts.trace=true} and see what is handled Well, that kind of confirms my suspicion. I attach the relevant stuff

[NTG-context] latest beta (again)

2008-10-09 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
Hans, I still have some problems with my fonts in the latest beta. Maybe it has to do with the latest optimizations. I'm just wondering: in my Greek typescripts, I define several fontfeatures and connect them with featurefiles, like so (just an example, the list is longer):

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta (again)

2008-10-09 Thread Hans Hagen
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: Hans, I still have some problems with my fonts in the latest beta. Maybe it has to do with the latest optimizations. I'm just wondering: in my Greek typescripts, I define several fontfeatures and connect them with featurefiles, like so (just an example, the

[NTG-context] latest beta

2008-10-08 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
Hi Hans, the latest beta has a problem with font handling: in my Greek output, the letters sigma and sigmaalt don't work anymore; they're replaced either by some undefined character (box with letter X in it) or by empty spaces. I tried to find out where something has changed, but haven't

Re: [NTG-context] Latest beta + LuaTeX

2008-07-17 Thread Peter Rolf
Martin Schröder schrieb: 2008/7/16 Peter Rolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]: the results (don't continue to read if you want a happy end): pdftex 1.40.3 produces a pdf, that shows no side effects when it's included by the same version of pdftex (1.40.3). if i include that pdf with the current 1.40.9-rc1 i

Re: [NTG-context] Latest beta + LuaTeX

2008-07-17 Thread Peter Rolf
Peter Rolf schrieb: Martin Schröder schrieb: 2008/7/16 Peter Rolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]: the results (don't continue to read if you want a happy end): pdftex 1.40.3 produces a pdf, that shows no side effects when it's included by the same version of pdftex (1.40.3). if i include that pdf with

Re: [NTG-context] Latest beta + LuaTeX

2008-07-17 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Peter Rolf wrote: Martin Schröder schrieb: 2008/7/16 Peter Rolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]: the results (don't continue to read if you want a happy end): pdftex 1.40.3 produces a pdf, that shows no side effects when it's included by the same version of pdftex

Re: [NTG-context] Latest beta + LuaTeX

2008-07-17 Thread Peter Rolf
Mojca Miklavec schrieb: On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Peter Rolf wrote: Martin Schröder schrieb: 2008/7/16 Peter Rolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]: the results (don't continue to read if you want a happy end): pdftex 1.40.3 produces a pdf, that shows no side effects when it's included by the same

Re: [NTG-context] Latest beta + LuaTeX

2008-07-16 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Taco Hoekwater wrote: Thanks, for the heads up. The luatex trunk is a bit in flux at the moment. We are trying to squeeze the previous half year of pdftex and texlive development into it, and it takes some effort. For the repository users of luatex: The trunk seems to be compiling and

Re: [NTG-context] Latest beta + LuaTeX

2008-07-16 Thread Peter Rolf
Taco Hoekwater schrieb: Taco Hoekwater wrote: Thanks, for the heads up. The luatex trunk is a bit in flux at the moment. We are trying to squeeze the previous half year of pdftex and texlive development into it, and it takes some effort. For the repository users of luatex: The trunk seems

Re: [NTG-context] Latest beta + LuaTeX

2008-07-16 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Peter Rolf wrote: Taco Hoekwater schrieb: Taco Hoekwater wrote: Thanks, for the heads up. The luatex trunk is a bit in flux at the moment. We are trying to squeeze the previous half year of pdftex and texlive development into it, and it takes some effort. For the repository users of

Re: [NTG-context] Latest beta + LuaTeX

2008-07-16 Thread Peter Rolf
Taco Hoekwater schrieb: Peter Rolf wrote: Taco Hoekwater schrieb: Taco Hoekwater wrote: Thanks, for the heads up. The luatex trunk is a bit in flux at the moment. We are trying to squeeze the previous half year of pdftex and texlive development into it, and it takes some effort. For the

Re: [NTG-context] Latest beta + LuaTeX

2008-07-16 Thread Mojca Miklavec
sure. if someone can point me to the windows binaries of pdftex 1.40.3 i can test that. Maybe the one from TeX Live 2007? http://www.tug.org/svn/texlive/trunk/Master/bin/win32/pdftex.exe?view=log Mojca ___ If

Re: [NTG-context] Latest beta + LuaTeX

2008-07-16 Thread Peter Rolf
Mojca Miklavec schrieb: sure. if someone can point me to the windows binaries of pdftex 1.40.3 i can test that. Maybe the one from TeX Live 2007? http://www.tug.org/svn/texlive/trunk/Master/bin/win32/pdftex.exe?view=log thank you Mojca (revision 5403). Mojca

Re: [NTG-context] Latest beta + LuaTeX

2008-07-16 Thread Peter Rolf
Mojca Miklavec schrieb: sure. if someone can point me to the windows binaries of pdftex 1.40.3 i can test that. Maybe the one from TeX Live 2007? http://www.tug.org/svn/texlive/trunk/Master/bin/win32/pdftex.exe?view=log one thing left: pdftex.pool is missing (the good old days with

Re: [NTG-context] Latest beta + LuaTeX

2008-07-16 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Peter Rolf wrote: Mojca Miklavec schrieb: sure. if someone can point me to the windows binaries of pdftex 1.40.3 i can test that. Maybe the one from TeX Live 2007? http://www.tug.org/svn/texlive/trunk/Master/bin/win32/pdftex.exe?view=log one thing left:

Re: [NTG-context] Latest beta + LuaTeX

2008-07-16 Thread Peter Rolf
Taco Hoekwater schrieb: Peter Rolf wrote: Taco Hoekwater schrieb: Taco Hoekwater wrote: Thanks, for the heads up. The luatex trunk is a bit in flux at the moment. We are trying to squeeze the previous half year of pdftex and texlive development into it, and it takes some effort. For the

Re: [NTG-context] Latest beta + LuaTeX

2008-07-16 Thread Martin Schröder
2008/7/16 Peter Rolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]: the results (don't continue to read if you want a happy end): pdftex 1.40.3 produces a pdf, that shows no side effects when it's included by the same version of pdftex (1.40.3). if i include that pdf with the current 1.40.9-rc1 i get the wrong color in

[NTG-context] Latest beta + LuaTeX

2008-07-15 Thread Otared Kavian
Dear magicians, I just updated to the latest betas (ConTeXt and LuaTeX taken on svn://scm.foundry.supelec.fr/svn/luatex and I tried to build luatex on my machine (MacBook Pro under Mac OS X 10.5.4): everything goes fine, the binary is there, that is in trunk/build/texk/web2c/luatex but trying

Re: [NTG-context] Latest beta + LuaTeX

2008-07-15 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Otared Kavian wrote: Dear magicians, I just updated to the latest betas (ConTeXt and LuaTeX taken on svn://scm.foundry.supelec.fr/svn/luatex and I tried to build luatex on my machine (MacBook Pro under Mac OS X 10.5.4): everything goes fine, the binary is there, that is in

[NTG-context] latest beta hates most of my fonts

2008-02-13 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
the latest beta refuses to work with most of my (Greek) fonts. I have compiled the very latest trunk (rev. 1006, I think). Difficult to make a minimal example because it doesn't happen with simple Latin text, only when there's Greek in the file. The error message is always similar:

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta hates most of my fonts

2008-02-13 Thread Hans Hagen
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: the latest beta refuses to work with most of my (Greek) fonts. I have compiled the very latest trunk (rev. 1006, I think). Difficult to make a minimal example because it doesn't happen with simple Latin text, only when there's Greek in the file. The error message

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta hates most of my fonts

2008-02-13 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On Feb 13, 2008, at 5:05 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: Here's a minimal example for the start: texexec --xtx --make --all but this has already been reported and I'm not sure if it's the same problem. /context/texmf-context/tex/context/patterns/lang-agr.pat ! Nonletter. l.206 4´

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta hates most of my fonts

2008-02-13 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Feb 13, 2008 4:55 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: the latest beta refuses to work with most of my (Greek) fonts. hard to check without a small test file; Here's a minimal example for the start: texexec --xtx --make --all but this has already been reported and I'm not

[NTG-context] latest beta

2008-01-31 Thread Thomas A . Schmitz
Hi Hans, great: I now get Greek hyphenation with XeTeX as well! However, there's a problem with mkiv: none of my mkiv-typescripts works with it; I always get this error: This went wrong: ...al/texlive/texmf-local/tex/context/base/luat- tmp.lua:121: attempt to call field 'is_writable' (a nil

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta

2008-01-31 Thread Hans Hagen
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: On Jan 31, 2008, at 10:43 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: Hi Hans, great: I now get Greek hyphenation with XeTeX as well! However, there's a problem with mkiv: none of my mkiv-typescripts works with it; I always get this error: This went

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta

2008-01-31 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On Jan 31, 2008, at 11:17 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: ok, i'll make a new beta zip; i dunny what went wrong; normally there is no reason to delete the cache; can you test again? Hans Great, this one works! Thanks for your swift action, Hans. I haven't played with zipped trees yet, but

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta

2008-01-31 Thread Hans Hagen
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: On Jan 31, 2008, at 11:17 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: ok, i'll make a new beta zip; i dunny what went wrong; normally there is no reason to delete the cache; can you test again? Hans Great, this one works! Thanks for your swift action, Hans. I haven't played

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta (2008-01-09 19:58)

2008-01-10 Thread luigi scarso
How many languages did you learn and use during the last years? I'm waiting for lispTeX, pythonTeX, http://wiki.contextgarden.net/User:Luigi.scarso#Luatex_hosts_python -- luigi it's new . it's powerful . it's luatex . http://www.luatex.org

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta (2008-01-09 19:58)

2008-01-10 Thread Hans Hagen
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: On Jan 9, 2008, at 11:06 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: you can also test this (there is a file 'context' somewhere as stub) mtxrun --script context blabla.tex i.e. this is the upcoming replacement of texexec in case of luatex/ mkiv Hans Yes, it works if I call it

[NTG-context] latest beta (2008-01-09 19:58)

2008-01-09 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
Hi Hans, there seems to be a problem with the latest beta; compilation stops with several of these warnings: error define font: font with name lmromanslant12-regular is not found error define font: name: lmromanslant12-regular, loading aborted ! Font

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta (2008-01-09 19:58)

2008-01-09 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Jan 9, 2008 9:22 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: Hi Hans, there seems to be a problem with the latest beta; compilation stops with several of these warnings: error define font: font with name lmromanslant12-regular is not found error define font: name: lmromanslant12-regular, loading

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta (2008-01-09 19:58)

2008-01-09 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On Jan 9, 2008, at 9:54 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: Hans has updated files without a please don't update yet warning (that's what beta in ConTeXt means, after all :). Drats, I always thought it meant download immediately! A new version of LM is in front of the door, and ConTeXt tries to be

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta (2008-01-09 19:58)

2008-01-09 Thread Hans Hagen
Mojca Miklavec wrote: Hans has updated files without a please don't update yet warning (that's what beta in ConTeXt means, after all :). A new version of LM is in front of the door, and ConTeXt tries to be kept up-to-date, or better, ahead-of-time. hey, since you were in this

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta (2008-01-09 19:58)

2008-01-09 Thread Hans Hagen
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: Hi Hans, there seems to be a problem with the latest beta; compilation stops with several of these warnings: error define font: font with name lmromanslant12-regular is not found error define font: name: lmromanslant12-regular, loading aborted ! Font

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta (2008-01-09 19:58)

2008-01-09 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On Jan 9, 2008, at 10:48 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: aha, i need a bidirectional fallback ... making a new beta now since i have both names on my system it's tricky to test (don't want to mess up things too much) Hans New one works... Thanks for the quick fix! Thomas

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta (2008-01-09 19:58)

2008-01-09 Thread Hans Hagen
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: On Jan 9, 2008, at 10:48 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: aha, i need a bidirectional fallback ... making a new beta now since i have both names on my system it's tricky to test (don't want to mess up things too much) Hans New one works... Thanks for the quick fix!

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta (2008-01-09 19:58)

2008-01-09 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Jan 9, 2008 10:17 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: On Jan 9, 2008, at 9:54 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: Hans has updated files without a please don't update yet warning (that's what beta in ConTeXt means, after all :). Drats, I always thought it meant download immediately! Such specific

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta (2008-01-09 19:58)

2008-01-09 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On Jan 9, 2008, at 11:06 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: you can also test this (there is a file 'context' somewhere as stub) mtxrun --script context blabla.tex i.e. this is the upcoming replacement of texexec in case of luatex/ mkiv Hans Yes, it works if I call it with mtxrun --script context

[NTG-context] latest beta

2008-01-08 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
Hi all, Taco, Hans, this combination of latest betas: This is LuaTeX, Version snapshot-0.20.2-2007121721 CtxTools | context version: 2008.01.03 16:25 gives me output without the usual TeX ligatures (fi etc.). I'm uncertain whether it is worth reporting such things or whether, given the

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta

2008-01-08 Thread Hans Hagen
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: Hi all, Taco, Hans, this combination of latest betas: This is LuaTeX, Version snapshot-0.20.2-2007121721 CtxTools | context version: 2008.01.03 16:25 gives me output without the usual TeX ligatures (fi etc.). I'm uncertain whether it is worth reporting such

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta and \doifnotallmodes

2006-09-28 Thread Hans Hagen
Alan Bowen wrote: On Sep 27, 2006, at 3:04 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: Alan Bowen wrote: On Sep 27, 2006, at 12:32 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: Alan Bowen wrote: \doifnotallmodes{mode1,mode2,mode3}{ defaultmode instructions } gets�the following error message: system� � � � � : mark BibTitle

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta and \doifnotallmodes

2006-09-28 Thread Alan Bowen
On Sep 28, 2006, at 3:39 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: Alan Bowen wrote: On Sep 27, 2006, at 3:04 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: Alan Bowen wrote: On Sep 27, 2006, at 12:32 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: Alan Bowen wrote: \doifnotallmodes{mode1,mode2,mode3}{ defaultmode instructions } gets�the following

[NTG-context] latest beta and \doifnotallmodes

2006-09-27 Thread Alan Bowen
\doifnotallmodes{mode1,mode2,mode3}{ defaultmode instructions}gets the following error message: system          : mark BibTitle defined [subject] ! Missing number, treated as zero. to be read again                    \scct:0 \catcodetable ...\fi \the \csname @@cct:\number #1                 

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta and \doifnotallmodes

2006-09-27 Thread Hans Hagen
Alan Bowen wrote: \doifnotallmodes{mode1,mode2,mode3}{ defaultmode instructions } gets�the following error message: system� � � � � : mark BibTitle defined [subject] ! Missing number, treated as zero. to be read again � � � � � � � � �� \scct:0 \catcodetable ...\fi \the \csname

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta and \doifnotallmodes

2006-09-27 Thread Hans Hagen
Alan Bowen wrote: On Sep 27, 2006, at 12:32 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: Alan Bowen wrote: \doifnotallmodes{mode1,mode2,mode3}{ defaultmode instructions } gets�the following error message: system� � � � � : mark BibTitle defined [subject] ! Missing number, treated as zero. to be read again �

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta

2006-04-08 Thread Hans Hagen
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: Hans and all, there are two unpleasant things in the lates releases which may be bugs: 1. newtexexec --module --pdf does not work, it just doesn't process the modules (works with old texexec) 2. not sure if this is a misconfiguration on my system, but when I

[NTG-context] latest beta

2006-04-07 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
Hans and all, there are two unpleasant things in the lates releases which may be bugs: 1. newtexexec --module --pdf does not work, it just doesn't process the modules (works with old texexec) 2. not sure if this is a misconfiguration on my system, but when I try to use texmfstart, I get

Re: [NTG-context] latest beta

2006-04-07 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
Oops, I spake too soon. Both issues seem to be resolved with the current stable release! Sorry for the noise! Thomas On Apr 7, 2006, at 2:29 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: Hans and all, there are two unpleasant things in the lates releases which may be bugs: 1. newtexexec --module --pdf

<    1   2   3