Re: [NTG-context] [***SPAM***] RE: Footnote line position

2014-02-08 Thread Jan Tosovsky 
On 2013-12-01 Jan Tosovsky wrote:
 On 2013-11-22 Jan Tosovsky wrote:
 
  when a single line footnote is used, the footnote divider is
  rendered in larger distance than for footnotes with two or
  more lines (I mean a gap between the line and the footnote text).
 
  It can be tested easily:
 
  \chapter{Chapter}Foo\footnote{Bar}.
  \chapter{Chapter}Foo\footnote{Bar
 
  Bar}.
 
 
 This behaviour seems to be driven by this code in strc-not.mkvi:
 
 \unexpanded\def\normalnoterule
   {\ifvmode
  \dontleavehmode \blackrule
[\c!color=\noteparameter\c!rulecolor,
 \c!width=.2\hsize,
 \c!height=\noteparameter\c!rulethickness,
 \c!depth=\zeropoint]%
  \endgraf
  \kern\strutdepth
\fi}
 
 When e.g. \endgraf or \kern\strutdepth lines are commented, the gap is
 smaller, but still different.
 
 Changing the depth from \zeropoint to a bigger value (1cm) makes the
 gap same, but it leads to extreme thick rule.
 

After couple of weeks I've updated my Beta and I cannot reproduce the
original behaviour any more!

Thanks for fixing, 

Jan

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

[NTG-context] [***SPAM***] RE: Footnote line position

2013-12-01 Thread Jan Tosovsky 
On 2013-11-22 Jan Tosovsky wrote:
 
 when a single line footnote is used, the footnote divider is 
 rendered in larger distance than for footnotes with two or 
 more lines (I mean a gap between the line and the footnote text).

 It can be tested easily:
 
 \chapter{Chapter}Foo\footnote{Bar}.
 \chapter{Chapter}Foo\footnote{Bar
 
 Bar}.
 

This behaviour seems to be driven by this code in strc-not.mkvi:

\unexpanded\def\normalnoterule
  {\ifvmode
 \dontleavehmode \blackrule
   [\c!color=\noteparameter\c!rulecolor,
\c!width=.2\hsize,
\c!height=\noteparameter\c!rulethickness,
\c!depth=\zeropoint]%
 \endgraf
 \kern\strutdepth
   \fi}

When e.g. \endgraf or \kern\strutdepth lines are commented, the gap is
smaller, but still different.

Changing the depth from \zeropoint to a bigger value (1cm) makes the gap
same, but it leads to extreme thick rule.

What else could be tweaked here?

Thnaks, Jan

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___