On 2010-12-18 <20:58:01>, Philipp A. wrote:
> hi,
> do you really support this obsolete statement?
>
> if so: why?
>
>- html mail is supported by every mail reader nowadays, and nowhere near
>broken
>- semantic html is way better for blind people than plain text, since it
>is, well, semantically structured. something enclosed in em-tags will e.g.
>pronounced in a accentuated voice by the screen reader.
>- e mail sizes are no problem with today's hd capacity
>- every proper mail reader does block pics from foreign sources for
>privacy reasons
>
> essentially: this was true, and isn't anymore.
>
> if you think http://www.xkcd.com/386 , you are right, i'm like that :)
I refuse to discuss this matter outside a pub.
>
> cu in the context forum,
> philipp
> ___
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
> Wiki!
>
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
> archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
> wiki : http://contextgarden.net
> ___
--
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
pgp1QUoY3cCQK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
