On 9-5-2011 11:13, Paul Menzel wrote:
If so, we can add an option to \setupmathematics or a dedicated
\setupdots (or something similar) command.
That sounds like a feasible solution.
I have no clue what dotsb is supposed to to so it's up to Aditya to
provide it.
Hans
Am Montag, den 09.05.2011, 16:47 -0400 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
> On Wed, 4 May 2011, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> > On 4-5-2011 12:52, Paul Menzel wrote:
> >
> >> I think the question is the following. Does ConTeXt want to define all
> >> commands amstex/amsmath defines?
> >
> > You need to convince Adit
On Wed, 4 May 2011, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 4-5-2011 12:52, Paul Menzel wrote:
I think the question is the following. Does ConTeXt want to define all
commands amstex/amsmath defines?
You need to convince Aditya then as he has to make up that list.
I think that ConTeXt should be feature compat
On 4-5-2011 12:52, Paul Menzel wrote:
I think the question is the following. Does ConTeXt want to define all
commands amstex/amsmath defines?
You need to convince Aditya then as he has to make up that list.
Hans
-
Am Dienstag, den 03.05.2011, 23:54 -0400 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
> On Tue, 3 May 2011, Paul Menzel wrote:
> > `\dotsb` is not defined although it is defined in AMSTeX (amsmath) [1].
> >
> > Is `\dotsb` not defined intentionally?
>
> I do not completely understand why this command is needed. I thi
Am Dienstag, den 03.05.2011, 22:25 +0200 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
> Am 03.05.2011 um 15:46 schrieb Paul Menzel:
> > `\dotsb` is not defined although it is defined in AMSTeX (amsmath) [1].
>
> Why don’t you use \cdots, i can see no difference between your linked example
> and mine below.
>
> \
On Tue, 3 May 2011, Paul Menzel wrote:
Dear ConTeXt folks,
`\dotsb` is not defined although it is defined in AMSTeX (amsmath) [1].
Is `\dotsb` not defined intentionally?
I do not completely understand why this command is needed. I think that
the intent of amstex is that the user should use
Am 03.05.2011 um 15:46 schrieb Paul Menzel:
> Dear ConTeXt folks,
>
>
> `\dotsb` is not defined although it is defined in AMSTeX (amsmath) [1].
Why don’t you use \cdots, i can see no difference between your linked example
and mine below.
\setupbodyfont[pagella]
\starttext
\formula{A_1+\cdots
Dear ConTeXt folks,
`\dotsb` is not defined although it is defined in AMSTeX (amsmath) [1].
Please find the following minimal example also attached.
\starttext
This throws an error, since »\backslash dotsb« is not defined.
\startformula
1 + 2 + 3