On 28.02.2011 00:20, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 06:14:36PM -0500, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
IMO this does only partially help, consider the following example:
\starttext
$(B, Y, R, X)$
\setupmathematics[autopunctuation=no]
$(B, Y, R, X)$
Some time ago I was wondering if there's something like
kerning in math mode, too. Does that mean it would work if I switch to
cambria math fonts?
It would at least work better for cases such as different spacing
between letter F, Y or X and comma (where F and Y leave too much empty
space).
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011, S Barmeier wrote:
I don't know if anyone feels the same, but I'm not happy with the
spacing of commas in math mode (pictures attached). For instance,
typesetting H^1(X,F), the comma seems to be closer to the F than to the
X. Equal spacing on both sides or setting the comma
Hi!
On 27.02.2011 20:58, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011, S Barmeier wrote:
I don't know if anyone feels the same, but I'm not happy with the
spacing of commas in math mode (pictures attached). For instance,
typesetting H^1(X,F), the comma seems to be closer to the F than to the
X.
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 23:49, Stefan Müller warrence@gmx.de wrote:
Hi!
On 27.02.2011 20:58, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011, S Barmeier wrote:
I don't know if anyone feels the same, but I'm not happy with the
spacing of commas in math mode (pictures attached). For instance,
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 00:10, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 23:49, Stefan Müller wrote:
\starttext
$(B, Y, R, X)$
\setupmathematics[autopunctuation=no]
$(B, Y, R, X)$
\stoptext
In both lines the spacing after Y is way to big. I don't know if that's a
bug or just ugly.
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 23:49, Stefan Müller warrence@gmx.de wrote:
Hi!
On 27.02.2011 20:58, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011, S Barmeier wrote:
I don't know if anyone feels the same, but I'm not happy with the
spacing of commas in
Am 28.02.2011 um 00:14 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 23:49, Stefan Müller warrence@gmx.de wrote:
Hi!
On 27.02.2011 20:58, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011, S Barmeier wrote:
I don't know if anyone feels the
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 00:14, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 23:49, Stefan Müller warrence@gmx.de wrote:
Hi!
On 27.02.2011 20:58, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011, S Barmeier wrote:
I don't know if
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 06:14:36PM -0500, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
IMO this does only partially help, consider the following example:
\starttext
$(B, Y, R, X)$
\setupmathematics[autopunctuation=no]
$(B, Y, R, X)$
\stoptext
In both lines the
I don't know if anyone feels the same, but I'm not happy with the
spacing of commas in math mode (pictures attached). For instance,
typesetting H^1(X,F), the comma seems to be closer to the F than to the
X. Equal spacing on both sides or setting the comma closer to the X are
I guess a matter of
11 matches
Mail list logo