On Sun, Nov 01 2009, Vnpenguin wrote:
a) (dangerous; I would not do it) install a more recent version of
libc on your machine
It's NOT possible.
Hello Vnpenguin,
Why not?
b) we need to set up some virtual machine with an old linux and
compile binaries there or find someone else
On Sun, Nov 01 2009, Vnpenguin wrote:
xetex
xetex: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.9' not found
(required by xetex)
Hello,
Here, I don't know how to help. I've these packages on my system:
libstdc++33-3.3.3
libstdc++33-devel-3.3.3
libstdc++41-devel-4.1.3_20080612
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 09:20, Peter Münster pmli...@free.fr wrote:
On Sun, Nov 01 2009, Vnpenguin wrote:
a) (dangerous; I would not do it) install a more recent version of
libc on your machine
It's NOT possible.
Hello Vnpenguin,
Why not?
In our production environment, only RHEL
Hi,
Just installed minimal on CentOS x86_64. The installation is ok, but
when I try pdftex, there is error:
pdftex
pdftex: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (required by pdftex)
yum list installed glibc*
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities
Excluding Packages in global
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 18:00, Vnpenguin wrote:
Hi,
Just installed minimal on CentOS x86_64. The installation is ok, but
when I try pdftex, there is error:
pdftex
pdftex: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (required by pdftex)
Any help for this problem ?
This is weird. Peter -
I forgot to ask: does only pdftex cause problems or also metapost,
luatex, xetex? It might help to know which of these programs still
work.
Mojca
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 18:00, Vnpenguin wrote:
pdftex: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (required by pdftex)
glibc.i686 2.5-42
Any help for this problem ?
Yes, the easy answer would be upgrade your linux, but we probably
want the
2009/11/1 Mojca Miklavec mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com:
Yes, the easy answer would be upgrade your linux, but we probably
want the binaries to run on slightly older machines as well.
Indeed. Btw: The binaries from TL run on SUSE 10.1 (which has glibc
2.4).
Best
Martin
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 18:47, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 18:00, Vnpenguin wrote:
Hi,
Just installed minimal on CentOS x86_64. The installation is ok, but
when I try pdftex, there is error:
pdftex
pdftex: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (required by pdftex)
Martin Schröder wrote:
2009/11/1 Mojca Miklavec mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com:
Yes, the easy answer would be upgrade your linux, but we probably
want the binaries to run on slightly older machines as well.
Indeed. Btw: The binaries from TL run on SUSE 10.1 (which has glibc
2.4).
ah, so
2009/11/1 Mojca Miklavec mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com:
I'm sweating ... trying to download Sarge DVD on this extra-slow
connection. And then you remind me that I have a big cartoon box of
original SuSE 7.2 right below my desk. (Maybe I should start
considering throwing away a few things like
2009/11/1 Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl:
Martin Schröder wrote:
Indeed. Btw: The binaries from TL run on SUSE 10.1 (which has glibc
2.4).
ah, so maybe you can learn mojca a few tricks then; does this mean that tex
live binaries have some built in magic that checks for libs?
No, they are simply
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 18:48, Mojca Miklavec
mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com wrote:
I forgot to ask: does only pdftex cause problems or also metapost,
luatex, xetex? It might help to know which of these programs still
work.
mpost
mpost: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found
Martin Schröder wrote:
2009/11/1 Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl:
Martin Schröder wrote:
Indeed. Btw: The binaries from TL run on SUSE 10.1 (which has glibc
2.4).
ah, so maybe you can learn mojca a few tricks then; does this mean that tex
live binaries have some built in magic that checks for libs?
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 18:50, Mojca Miklavec
mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 18:00, Vnpenguin wrote:
pdftex: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (required by pdftex)
glibc.i686 2.5-42
Any help for this
2009/11/1 Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl:
Martin Schröder wrote:
No, they are simply build on old systems. Ask Peter. :-)
ah, so they're static binaries
Mostly. glibc is not statically linked.
ldd Master/bin/x86_64-linux/pdftex
libm.so.6 = /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x2b1771708000)
2009/11/1 Vnpenguin vnpeng...@vnoss.org:
My box CentOS 5.4 with all updates. What do you mean upgrade ?
What glibc-version do you have? rpm -qi glibc?
Best
Martin
___
If your question is of interest to others as
2009/11/1 Mojca Miklavec mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com:
Or maybe I was too fast. I don't find the exact timeline of libc
development, so I have no idea how old your linux is. I thought that
this failure was recent, but apparently it's not (the garden most
probably has libc-2.8). For 32-bit
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 19:30, Martin Schröder mar...@oneiros.de wrote:
2009/11/1 Vnpenguin vnpeng...@vnoss.org:
My box CentOS 5.4 with all updates. What do you mean upgrade ?
What glibc-version do you have? rpm -qi glibc?
# yum list installed glibc\*
Excluding Packages in global exclude list
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 19:24, Vnpenguin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 18:50, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 18:00, Vnpenguin wrote:
pdftex: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (required by pdftex)
glibc.i686 2.5-42
Any
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 19:59, Mojca Miklavec
mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 19:24, Vnpenguin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 18:50, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 18:00, Vnpenguin wrote:
pdftex: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found
Hey, CentOS 5.4 just released on 21-May-2009 :-) If I have problem
with ConTeXt on CentOS 5.4 so all users of RHEL 5.4 are the same: they
can not!
Correction: CentOS 5.4 was released on 21-Oct-2009. So it's not so
old at all :-)
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 21:10, Vnpenguin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 19:59, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Apparently it means that CentOS uses something like a
several-years-span-back-in-time libc library and you cannot do much
about it. That's no problem in general since you would not take a
2009/11/1 Vnpenguin vnpeng...@vnoss.org:
Correction: CentOS 5.4 was released on 21-Oct-2009. So it's not so
old at all :-)
Sorry, but it is. It's a free version of RHEL5, which was initially
released in 2007.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centos
It you want something modern, use e.g. Fedora.
Vnpenguin, what kernel is running on your OS?
If we set up a virtual machine for compiling binaries - does anyone
have a suggesting what OS to take, so that it will remain compatible
with as many x86_64 processors as possible? (Apparently glibc and
kerner are the deciding factors; but it needs to
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 21:45, Mojca Miklavec
mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Vnpenguin, what kernel is running on your OS?
The current kernel is:
uname -r
2.6.18-164.2.1.el5
If we set up a virtual machine for compiling binaries - does anyone
have a suggesting what OS to take, so that
On 1 November 2009 Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Vnpenguin, what kernel is running on your OS?
If we set up a virtual machine for compiling binaries - does anyone
have a suggesting what OS to take, so that it will remain compatible
with as many x86_64 processors as possible? (Apparently glibc
On Sun, Nov 01 2009, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
pdftex
pdftex: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (required by pdftex)
Any help for this problem ?
This is weird. Peter - did you upgrade your linux in the meantime by
any chance? (The update dates back to 17th October.)
Hello,
28 matches
Mail list logo
