Dne sobota 29. decembra 2007 je Aditya Mahajan napisal(a):
> \def\mycite{\dodoubleempty\domycite}
>
> \def\domycite[#1][#2]%
> {\doifdefinedelse{mycite:#2}
> {\cite[#1][#2]}
> {cite author, title, etc.% I don't remember the exact commands
> \setvalue{mycite:#2}{done}}
Tha
Dne sobota 29. decembra 2007 je Aditya Mahajan napisal(a):
> This way, \mycite will give the complete citation the first time, and only
> the number when used later on. This does not take care of the
> compatibility method of cite, viz. \cite{ref}.
Hmmm, I'll try this later. Thanks for the code th
Hi Matija,
I can provide partial answers to your questions.
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007, Matija Šuklje wrote:
* this might be a tough one — (at least in Slovenia's legal circles) legal
documents get cited for the first time (e.g. with \cite) the same way as in
the bibliography (full name, abbrev, jou
Dne petek 28. decembra 2007 je Taco Hoekwater napisal(a):
> Your pf_ul.tex had a spurious (or incomplete) \insert command at
> the end, that is what was causing an error problems "Missing number".
Yes, I figured that out not too long after I posted my files. Sorry about
that.
> For the footnoted
Matija Šuklje wrote:
> Dne četrtek 27. decembra 2007 je Taco Hoekwater napisal(a):
>> The solution is probably along the lines of
>> [...]
>> More tomorrow, maybe. You have picked the worst possible time to ask
>> me about computer stuff. ;-)
>
> Thanks, will try tomorrow. My day has been amazingl
Dne četrtek 27. decembra 2007 je Taco Hoekwater napisal(a):
> The solution is probably along the lines of
> [...]
> More tomorrow, maybe. You have picked the worst possible time to ask
> me about computer stuff. ;-)
Thanks, will try tomorrow. My day has been amazingly awful as well. I'll
probably
Matija Šuklje wrote:
> Dne četrtek 27. decembra 2007 je Matija Šuklje napisal(a):
>> From what I can tell the main problem is that in legal circles it's
>> considered bad form to cite (the short one) right next to the cited text.
>> The much preferred way is "below the line" in the footer.
>
> I t
Dne četrtek 27. decembra 2007 je Matija Šuklje napisal(a):
> From what I can tell the main problem is that in legal circles it's
> considered bad form to cite (the short one) right next to the cited text.
> The much preferred way is "below the line" in the footer.
I think I solved the problem with
Dne sreda 26. decembra 2007 je Matija Šuklje napisal(a):
> * for each cititation to have a reference number in superscript and
> Romannummerals next to the citation
> * a footnote on the "same" page in the form like "T. Hoekwater, BIB (2006),
> pp. 2-4"
> * and in the appendix a list with longer fo
Dne sreda 26. decembra 2007 je Taco Hoekwater napisal(a):
ad 1. & 2.:
Thanks, works like a charm :]
>Solution: none. it is not possible to combine 'short' citation
>and mainmatter/backmatter/appendices. (this problem is nasty, but
>quite hard to fix).
Damn. What I need to do is:
* fo
Matija Šuklje wrote:
Hullo,
I'm just making my first real document in ConTeXt and although I'm thinking
more and more how this was a great idea. I also decided to simultaneously
write an external document/module containing all definitions to fit the
But as a newbie, of course, I stumbled up
Hullo,
I'm just making my first real document in ConTeXt and although I'm thinking
more and more how this was a great idea. I also decided to simultaneously
write an external document/module containing all definitions to fit the
But as a newbie, of course, I stumbled upon some beginner's probl
12 matches
Mail list logo
