Re: [NTG-context] Formulas in ConTeXt are different from those in plain TeX
On 5/11/2013 12:16 PM, Tim Li wrote: > Thanks, Hans, > > can you give me a small example or show me how to do that? I really > don't know how to do that. :-( see plain.tex and the tex book but you can bet on interference ... deep down, math in context is implemented in a rather special way and that might conflict with more traditional approaches Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Formulas in ConTeXt are different from those in plain TeX
On 5/11/2013 1:57 AM, Tim Li wrote: Hi, I have asked this question on tex.stackexchange.com http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/113592/formulas-in-context-are-different-from-those-in-plain-tex/113609?noredirect=1#comment250549_113609 as the title said, formulas typeset by ConTeXt are different from those by plain TeX. The minimal examples are here: % plain luatex in ConTeXt standalone $$\int_a^bf(x)dx=F(b)-F(a)$$ \bye % context \starttext \startformula \int\nolimits_a^bf(x)dx=F(b)-F(a) \stopformula \stoptext Marco said to me that that's because the fonts used by LuaTeX and ConTeXt are different. This can be seen from the pdf produced by them pdffonts context.pdf name type emb sub uni object ID - --- --- --- - OLAZTU+LMRoman12-Regular CID Type 0C yes yes yes 18 0 RXHAAY+LatinModernMath-Regular CID Type 0C yes yes yes 19 0 JTHTZJ+LatinModernMath-Regular CID Type 0C yes yes yes 20 0 pdffonts plain.pdf name type emb sub uni object ID - --- --- --- - APMHZE+LMMathExtension10-Regular Type 1yes yes no 4 0 AWBTPY+LMMathItalic7-Regular Type 1yes yes no 5 0 ITITNI+LMMathItalic10-RegularType 1yes yes no 6 0 DMNVHT+LMRoman10-Regular Type 1yes yes no 7 0 MGKPYK+LMMathSymbols10-Regular Type 1yes yes no 8 0 even if using the `modern-designsize-virtual` typescript(advice from Marco), I still get the different outputs. Now, I get confused about this qustion. If ConTeXt uses LuaTeX as its engine, how can I tune ConTeXt so that it can produce the same formulas with those in plain TeX? you could define your own 'plain like' math setup using type one fonts and families and all symbol names redefined or use the virtual lm instead -- - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
[NTG-context] Formulas in ConTeXt are different from those in plain TeX
Hi, I have asked this question on tex.stackexchange.com http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/113592/formulas-in-context-are-different-from-those-in-plain-tex/113609?noredirect=1#comment250549_113609 as the title said, formulas typeset by ConTeXt are different from those by plain TeX. The minimal examples are here: % plain luatex in ConTeXt standalone $$\int_a^bf(x)dx=F(b)-F(a)$$ \bye % context \starttext \startformula \int\nolimits_a^bf(x)dx=F(b)-F(a) \stopformula \stoptext Marco said to me that that's because the fonts used by LuaTeX and ConTeXt are different. This can be seen from the pdf produced by them pdffonts context.pdf name type emb sub uni object ID - --- --- --- -OLAZTU+LMRoman12-Regular CID Type 0C yes yes yes 18 0 RXHAAY+LatinModernMath-Regular CID Type 0C yes yes yes 19 0JTHTZJ+LatinModernMath-Regular CID Type 0C yes yes yes 20 0 pdffonts plain.pdf name type emb sub uni object ID - --- --- --- - APMHZE+LMMathExtension10-Regular Type 1yes yes no 4 0 AWBTPY+LMMathItalic7-Regular Type 1yes yes no 5 0 ITITNI+LMMathItalic10-RegularType 1yes yes no 6 0 DMNVHT+LMRoman10-Regular Type 1yes yes no 7 0 MGKPYK+LMMathSymbols10-Regular Type 1yes yes no 8 0 even if using the `modern-designsize-virtual` typescript(advice from Marco), I still get the different outputs. Now, I get confused about this qustion. If ConTeXt uses LuaTeX as its engine, how can I tune ConTeXt so that it can produce the same formulas with those in plain TeX? Tim ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
