Re: [NTG-context] Ligatures on Linux Libertine Bold Italic

2010-11-08 Thread Marco
Taco Hoekwater  writes:

> On 11/08/2010 03:53 PM, Marco wrote:
>>
>> Hello there.
>>
>> I'm pretty new to ConTeXt and I'm really impressed by your work. So a
>> huge thanks is due.
>>
>> Anyway. Today I found that Linux Libertine Bold Italic doesn't create
>> the ligatures. These work on XeTeX. I took a look at
>> /tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/type-otf.mkiv where the libertine
>> typescript is defined, but I couldn't find anything wrong. The fonts are
>> the one shipped with the latest updated TeXlive 2010 (they are correctly
>> loaded).
>>
>> With other fonts the ligatures for Bold Italic are created, so I'm a bit
>> lost. Is my setup broken somehow? Or the fonts are broken? Or is it a
>> bug?
>
> Whether this is broken and/or a bug is not clear cut, but the Bold
> Italic font does not have a default script, so it needs an explicit
> script=latn in the feature setup (the other fonts actually do have a
> default script, it is just the bold italic that does not have one).
>
> I don't really know how to set that up in such a way that it will not
> affect other fonts as well, but as a workaround/large hammer method,
> adding this
>
>   \definefontfeature[default][default][script=latn]
>
> before loading the typescript will probably work.
>
> Best wishes,
> Taco

It worked. Now it's all clear to me. Thanks Wolfgang and Taco. 

I'll report the bug to the linux libertine project.

-- 
Marco

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Ligatures on Linux Libertine Bold Italic

2010-11-08 Thread Taco Hoekwater

On 11/08/2010 03:53 PM, Marco wrote:


Hello there.

I'm pretty new to ConTeXt and I'm really impressed by your work. So a
huge thanks is due.

Anyway. Today I found that Linux Libertine Bold Italic doesn't create
the ligatures. These work on XeTeX. I took a look at
/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/type-otf.mkiv where the libertine
typescript is defined, but I couldn't find anything wrong. The fonts are
the one shipped with the latest updated TeXlive 2010 (they are correctly
loaded).

With other fonts the ligatures for Bold Italic are created, so I'm a bit
lost. Is my setup broken somehow? Or the fonts are broken? Or is it a
bug?


Whether this is broken and/or a bug is not clear cut, but the Bold
Italic font does not have a default script, so it needs an explicit
script=latn in the feature setup (the other fonts actually do have a
default script, it is just the bold italic that does not have one).

I don't really know how to set that up in such a way that it will not 
affect other fonts as well, but as a workaround/large hammer method,

adding this

  \definefontfeature[default][default][script=latn]

before loading the typescript will probably work.

Best wishes,
Taco
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Ligatures on Linux Libertine Bold Italic

2010-11-08 Thread Wolfgang Schuster

Am 08.11.2010 um 15:53 schrieb Marco:

> 
> Hello there. 
> 
> I'm pretty new to ConTeXt and I'm really impressed by your work. So a
> huge thanks is due. 
> 
> Anyway. Today I found that Linux Libertine Bold Italic doesn't create
> the ligatures. These work on XeTeX. I took a look at
> /tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/type-otf.mkiv where the libertine
> typescript is defined, but I couldn't find anything wrong. The fonts are
> the one shipped with the latest updated TeXlive 2010 (they are correctly
> loaded). 
> 
> With other fonts the ligatures for Bold Italic are created, so I'm a bit
> lost. Is my setup broken somehow? Or the fonts are broken? Or is it a
> bug? 

Add \definefontfeature[default][default][script=latn] before \setupbodyfont for 
Libertine.

ConTeXt expects for fonts to have ligatures in the default script of the font
which is for the case for the libertine fonts except for the bolditalic style
where you need the latin script to have ligatures, for me this is a bug in
the font and you should make a bug report.

Wolfgang

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


[NTG-context] Ligatures on Linux Libertine Bold Italic

2010-11-08 Thread Marco

Hello there. 

I'm pretty new to ConTeXt and I'm really impressed by your work. So a
huge thanks is due. 

Anyway. Today I found that Linux Libertine Bold Italic doesn't create
the ligatures. These work on XeTeX. I took a look at
/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/type-otf.mkiv where the libertine
typescript is defined, but I couldn't find anything wrong. The fonts are
the one shipped with the latest updated TeXlive 2010 (they are correctly
loaded). 

With other fonts the ligatures for Bold Italic are created, so I'm a bit
lost. Is my setup broken somehow? Or the fonts are broken? Or is it a
bug? 

Thanks in advance. 

 start minimal example % 
\usetypescript[termes,libertine]
\setupbodyfont[termes,12pt]

\def\testtext{
The fi ffl ffi fluf \par 
{\it The fi ffl ffi fluf fi} \par
{\bf The fi ffl ffi fluf} \par
{\bi The fi ffl ffi fluf}\par}



\starttext
Termes:
\testtext
\switchtobodyfont[libertine,12pt]
Libertine: 
\testtext
\stoptext

% end minimal example %%

ConTeXt  ver: 2010.11.03 19:42 MKIV  fmt: 2010.11.8  
LuaTeX, Version beta-0.63.0-2010091123 (From the latest minimal distribution)


pdffonts output

name type  emb sub uni object ID
 - --- --- --- -
PHAMRR+TeXGyreTermes-Regular CID Type 0C   yes yes yes 18  0
OOTVTU+TeXGyreTermes-Italic  CID Type 0C   yes yes yes 19  0
QEYIRB+TeXGyreTermes-BoldCID Type 0C   yes yes yes 20  0
ONUACL+TeXGyreTermes-BoldItalic  CID Type 0C   yes yes yes 21  0
YFUCDN+LinLibertineO CID Type 0C   yes yes yes 22  0
PYLANJ+LinLibertineOICID Type 0C   yes yes yes 23  0
LBBYDA+LinLibertineOBCID Type 0C   yes yes yes 24  0
FBIQKN+LinLibertineOBI   CID Type 0C   yes yes yes 25  0





-- 
Marco


___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___