08. 01. 2021. u 05:41, Aditya Mahajan piše:
On Fri, 8 Jan 2021, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 1/8/2021 12:39 AM, Vedran Miletić wrote:
It's whatever ConTeXt standalone has. I don't have any extra Lua installed:
--credits should mention the lua version
Should I see it on non-HiDPI as well? Because
On Fri, 8 Jan 2021, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 1/8/2021 12:39 AM, Vedran Miletić wrote:
>
> > It's whatever ConTeXt standalone has. I don't have any extra Lua installed:
>
> --credits should mention the lua version
>
> > Should I see it on non-HiDPI as well? Because it seems it's there.
>
> depend
On 07. 01. 2021. 23:01, Hans Hagen wrote:
what lua does your 2.08 have? if it's 5.2. then such small differences
can be a side effect of lua (different number models), serialization
of numbers (default accuracy), or maybe rounding in the lua=>tex font
interface (there were some fixes iir), the
Hello,
I compared latest ConTeXt standalone (LuaTeX 2.08) against TeX Live 2020
(LuaTeX 1.12). The produced PDFs are:
https://miletic.net/lipsum-112.pdf
https://miletic.net/lipsum-208.pdf
Viewing them with Evince (and I assume Adobe Reader, I don't have it at
hand to test) shows only minor d
On 1/8/2021 12:39 AM, Vedran Miletić wrote:
It's whatever ConTeXt standalone has. I don't have any extra Lua installed:
--credits should mention the lua version
Should I see it on non-HiDPI as well? Because it seems it's there.
depends on what you consider (non) hdpi ... the positioning of
On 1/7/2021 10:10 PM, Vedran Miletić wrote:
Hello,
I compared latest ConTeXt standalone (LuaTeX 2.08) against TeX Live 2020
(LuaTeX 1.12). The produced PDFs are:
https://miletic.net/lipsum-112.pdf
https://miletic.net/lipsum-208.pdf
Viewing them with Evince (and I assume Adobe Reader, I don't
