Re: [NTG-context] Nath bug?

2006-01-22 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Thursday, January 12, 2006 Aditya Mahajan wrote: The following does not work? Everything is fine if I replace the nath module with amsl. Any suggestions on how to make this work. \usemodule[nath] \starttext \startalign a = \underbrace{b}_{c} \\ c = d \stopalign \stoptext Sorry for

Re: [NTG-context] nath bug

2004-12-23 Thread David Munger
Giuseppe Bilotta wrote : \appendtoks \livesupsub@ \to\everymath in t-nath.tex after the definition of livesupsub@ and killsupsub@ Hmm... It seemed to work at first, but it just moved the problem. Now it's (\sum) limits that are typeset like in inline style. Maybe Hans has some

Re: [NTG-context] nath bug

2004-12-23 Thread Hans Hagen
David Munger wrote: Maybe Hans has some suggestion for a better solution: the problem is that the mathcode is ignored for characters with code 7 or 8 (sup- or subscript). So I'm currently changing the catcode of ^ and _ when entering mathmode. I hope he has! wel, then make me a zip with (1) the

Re: [NTG-context] nath bug

2004-12-21 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Friday, December 3, 2004 David Munger wrote: Hello Giuseppe, I think I found a bug in the nath module. Try the following: \usemodule[nath] \starttext \[ e^{f(x)} \] \stoptext And by the way, fractions in exponents are typeset too big: \usemodule[nath] \starttext \[