Re: [NTG-context] New current context: 2009.11.26

2009-11-28 Thread Bowen Alan C.

On Nov 27, 2009, at 17;29,08 , Mojca Miklavec wrote:

 On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 18:40, Bowen Alan C. wrote:
 On Nov 27, 2009, at 10;17,36 , Mojca Miklavec wrote:
 Bowen Alan C. wrote:
 I have successfully installed and run this latest ConTeXt (in the 
 minimals).
 
 What has happened to context --version and luatex --version?
 
 Both now get “command not found”.
 
 IIRC, mojca changed setuptex so that it only adjusts the PATH in the
 current subshell. Can that be the problem?
 
 Hard to believe (though anything is possible).
 
 My crystal ball says that Alan uses Mac OS X Snow Leopard with 32-bit 
 kernel.
 
 Alan, please:
 - fetch the latest first-setup.sh or set platform=osx-64 manually
 before calling mtxrun
 - you might need to remove --make from mtxrun and run mktexlsr/texexec
 --make manually until further notice (I need to fix some minor bug,
 sorry)
 
 Mojca
 
 Hi, Mojca—
 
 You have a great crystal ball! I have set my platform to 64-bit kernel 
 startup mode, re-started, and re-installed the latest from the minimals 
 using ./firstsetup.sh
 
 Still no recognition of context --version and luatex --version.
 As for your other suggestions, I get “command not found” for mtxrun, 
 texmfstart, texexec, mtexlsr.
 
 As you can probably also see in your crystal ball, I am at the limits of my 
 knowledge of unix  and how ConTeXt, luatex are installed. So while I am 
 happy to test what you say and provide feedback, please don’t get trapped 
 into dealing with me about a problem that will eventually go away anyway. 
 (My installation does still work, after all-- well, except for some 
 unresolved problems with multi-page tables, but that is another thread.)
 
 1. Check if you have either executed source setuptex (. setuptex) or
 set the path explicitely
 2. Please check the contents of /path/to/your/context/tex by typing
ls /path/to/your/context/tex
ls /path/to/your/context/tex/texmf-osx-64/bin
 3. What does
echo $PATH
 say (after making sure that . setuptex is executed)?
 
 Mojca

Mojca—

1. When I open Terminal, I always see the line
Setting /Applications/ConTeXtMinimals/tex as ConTeXt root.
so I take it that .setuptex has been executed

2.   ls /Applications/ConTeXtMinimals/tex gets:
mysetuptex  setuptex.batsetuptex.tmftexmf-cache texmf-local 
texmf-project
setuptexsetuptex.cshtexmf   texmf-context   texmf-osx-intel

3. echo $PATH gets:
/Applications/ConTeXtMinimals/tex/texmf-osx-64/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11/bin

Alan





___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] New current context: 2009.11.26

2009-11-28 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 15:35, Bowen Alan C. wrote:

 Mojca—

 1. When I open Terminal, I always see the line
 Setting /Applications/ConTeXtMinimals/tex as ConTeXt root.
 so I take it that .setuptex has been executed

 2.   ls /Applications/ConTeXtMinimals/tex gets:
 mysetuptex      setuptex.bat    setuptex.tmf    texmf-cache     texmf-local   
   texmf-project
 setuptex        setuptex.csh    texmf           texmf-context   
 texmf-osx-intel

 3. echo $PATH gets:
 /Applications/ConTeXtMinimals/tex/texmf-osx-64/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11/bin

This indicates that you didn't update first-setup.sh itself. You need
to fetch a newer version of first-setup.sh and check that ls
/Applications/ConTeXtMinimals/tex will contain the folder
texmf-osx-64.

Mojca
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] New current context: 2009.11.26

2009-11-28 Thread Bowen Alan C.
Mocja—

You are right. So to get the latest first-sstup.sh I ran 
$ curl -o first-setup.sh http://minimals.contextgarden.net/setup/first-setup.sh
and when I run 
$ ./first-setup.sh --context-=stable
I am now am denied permission 

Playing with the permissions -a or -u and using sudo does not seem to help.

I am assuming that when I eventually run the new first-setup.sh I will find a 
new folder:
/Applications/ConTeXtMinimals/tex/texmf-osx-64/


Alan

On Nov 28, 2009, at 09;45,35 , Mojca Miklavec wrote:

 On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 15:35, Bowen Alan C. wrote:
 
 Mojca—
 
 1. When I open Terminal, I always see the line
 Setting /Applications/ConTeXtMinimals/tex as ConTeXt root.
 so I take it that .setuptex has been executed
 
 2.   ls /Applications/ConTeXtMinimals/tex gets:
 mysetuptex  setuptex.batsetuptex.tmftexmf-cache texmf-local  
texmf-project
 setuptexsetuptex.cshtexmf   texmf-context   
 texmf-osx-intel
 
 3. echo $PATH gets:
 /Applications/ConTeXtMinimals/tex/texmf-osx-64/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11/bin
 
 This indicates that you didn't update first-setup.sh itself. You need
 to fetch a newer version of first-setup.sh and check that ls
 /Applications/ConTeXtMinimals/tex will contain the folder
 texmf-osx-64.
 
 Mojca
 ___
 If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
 Wiki!
 
 maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
 webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
 archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
 wiki : http://contextgarden.net
 ___

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] New current context: 2009.11.26

2009-11-28 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 17:24, Bowen Alan C. acbo...@princeton.edu wrote:
 Mocja—

 You are right. So to get the latest first-sstup.sh I ran
 $ curl -o first-setup.sh 
 http://minimals.contextgarden.net/setup/first-setup.sh
 and when I run
 $ ./first-setup.sh --context-=stable
 I am now am denied permission

Does
chmod +x first-setup.sh
help?

(I usually copy-paste the command from http://minimals.contextgarden.net/setup/:
rsync -ptv rsync://contextgarden.net/minimals/setup/first-setup.sh
)

Mojca
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] New current context: 2009.11.26

2009-11-28 Thread Bowen Alan C.
That does indeed help. I have now run first-setup.sh successfully and all is 
well: there is a new “texmf-osx-64” folder right where it should be and context 
--version now works too.

Many thanks, Mocja!

Alan
On Nov 28, 2009, at 11;38,27 , Mojca Miklavec wrote:

 On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 17:24, Bowen Alan C. acbo...@princeton.edu wrote:
 Mocja—
 
 You are right. So to get the latest first-sstup.sh I ran
 $ curl -o first-setup.sh 
 http://minimals.contextgarden.net/setup/first-setup.sh
 and when I run
 $ ./first-setup.sh --context-=stable
 I am now am denied permission
 
 Does
chmod +x first-setup.sh
 help?
 
 (I usually copy-paste the command from 
 http://minimals.contextgarden.net/setup/:
rsync -ptv rsync://contextgarden.net/minimals/setup/first-setup.sh
 )
 
 Mojca
 ___
 If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
 Wiki!
 
 maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
 webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
 archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
 wiki : http://contextgarden.net
 ___

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] New current context: 2009.11.26

2009-11-27 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz

On Nov 27, 2009, at 12:19 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:

 Hi,
 
 Hans released a new current context yesterday. This is mostly a bugfix/
 catchup release for mkiv functionality, but there are also a few other
 bugfixes.
 
 See http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Context_2009.11.26 for details.
 
 Best wishes,
 Taco

Hi Taco,

thanks for the announcement, and a short note, mostly for Mojca: the os x 
minimals still ship with a luatex binary that is broken wrt metapost (I haven't 
tested other platforms). I don't know when exactly Taco fixed this, but it must 
have been later. Any chance of compiling a newer luatex binary? Since this is a 
stable release, some people might rely on it for stability...

Thomas
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] New current context: 2009.11.26

2009-11-27 Thread Bowen Alan C.
I have successfully installed and run this latest ConTeXt (in the minimals). 

What has happened to context --version and luatex --version?

Both now get “command not found”.

Alan

On Nov 27, 2009, at 06;19,23 , Taco Hoekwater wrote:

 Hi,
 
 Hans released a new current context yesterday. This is mostly a bugfix/
 catchup release for mkiv functionality, but there are also a few other
 bugfixes.
 
 See http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Context_2009.11.26 for details.
 
 Best wishes,
 Taco
 
 ___
 If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
 Wiki!
 
 maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
 webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
 archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
 wiki : http://contextgarden.net
 ___

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] New current context: 2009.11.26

2009-11-27 Thread Taco Hoekwater


Bowen Alan C. wrote:
 I have successfully installed and run this latest ConTeXt (in the minimals). 
 
 What has happened to context --version and luatex --version?
 
 Both now get “command not found”.

IIRC, mojca changed setuptex so that it only adjusts the PATH in the
current subshell. Can that be the problem?

Best wishes,
Taco
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] New current context: 2009.11.26

2009-11-27 Thread Hans Hagen

Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote:

I see that  Wolfgang's fix for itemize indentation is not included in 
the new version. Was it forgotten or treated a 'hack'?


well, i'm not copying each hack into my sources indeed.

normally wolfgang (or aditya or taco or ...) will let me know off list 
when he/she's confident that a patch can make it in the core so i just 
wait till that moment


(keep in mind that patches need to be checked for side effects and those 
requesting some patch normally don't test all cases)


Hans


-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
 tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
 | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] New current context: 2009.11.26

2009-11-27 Thread Bowen Alan C.
On Nov 27, 2009, at 10;17,36 , Mojca Miklavec wrote:

 On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 12:27, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
 On Nov 27, 2009, at 12:19 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 Hans released a new current context yesterday. This is mostly a bugfix/
 catchup release for mkiv functionality, but there are also a few other
 bugfixes.
 
 See http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Context_2009.11.26 for details.
 
 Best wishes,
 Taco
 
 Hi Taco,
 
 thanks for the announcement, and a short note, mostly for Mojca: the os x 
 minimals still ship with a luatex binary that is broken wrt metapost (I 
 haven't tested other platforms).
 
 Working on it now.
 
 Bowen Alan C. wrote:
 I have successfully installed and run this latest ConTeXt (in the minimals).
 
 What has happened to context --version and luatex --version?
 
 Both now get “command not found”.
 
 IIRC, mojca changed setuptex so that it only adjusts the PATH in the
 current subshell. Can that be the problem?
 
 Hard to believe (though anything is possible).
 
 My crystal ball says that Alan uses Mac OS X Snow Leopard with 32-bit kernel.
 
 Alan, please:
 - fetch the latest first-setup.sh or set platform=osx-64 manually
 before calling mtxrun
 - you might need to remove --make from mtxrun and run mktexlsr/texexec
 --make manually until further notice (I need to fix some minor bug,
 sorry)
 
 Mojca

Hi, Mojca—

You have a great crystal ball! I have set my platform to 64-bit kernel startup 
mode, re-started, and re-installed the latest from the minimals using 
./firstsetup.sh

Still no recognition of context --version and luatex --version.
As for your other suggestions, I get “command not found” for mtxrun, 
texmfstart, texexec, mtexlsr.

As you can probably also see in your crystal ball, I am at the limits of my 
knowledge of unix  and how ConTeXt, luatex are installed. So while I am happy 
to test what you say and provide feedback, please don’t get trapped into 
dealing with me about a problem that will eventually go away anyway. (My 
installation does still work, after all-- well, except for some unresolved 
problems with multi-page tables, but that is another thread.)

Very best, Alan






___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] New current context: 2009.11.26

2009-11-27 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 18:40, Bowen Alan C. wrote:
 On Nov 27, 2009, at 10;17,36 , Mojca Miklavec wrote:
 Bowen Alan C. wrote:
 I have successfully installed and run this latest ConTeXt (in the 
 minimals).

 What has happened to context --version and luatex --version?

 Both now get “command not found”.

 IIRC, mojca changed setuptex so that it only adjusts the PATH in the
 current subshell. Can that be the problem?

 Hard to believe (though anything is possible).

 My crystal ball says that Alan uses Mac OS X Snow Leopard with 32-bit kernel.

 Alan, please:
 - fetch the latest first-setup.sh or set platform=osx-64 manually
 before calling mtxrun
 - you might need to remove --make from mtxrun and run mktexlsr/texexec
 --make manually until further notice (I need to fix some minor bug,
 sorry)

 Mojca

 Hi, Mojca—

 You have a great crystal ball! I have set my platform to 64-bit kernel 
 startup mode, re-started, and re-installed the latest from the minimals using 
 ./firstsetup.sh

 Still no recognition of context --version and luatex --version.
 As for your other suggestions, I get “command not found” for mtxrun, 
 texmfstart, texexec, mtexlsr.

 As you can probably also see in your crystal ball, I am at the limits of my 
 knowledge of unix  and how ConTeXt, luatex are installed. So while I am happy 
 to test what you say and provide feedback, please don’t get trapped into 
 dealing with me about a problem that will eventually go away anyway. (My 
 installation does still work, after all-- well, except for some unresolved 
 problems with multi-page tables, but that is another thread.)

1. Check if you have either executed source setuptex (. setuptex) or
set the path explicitely
2. Please check the contents of /path/to/your/context/tex by typing
ls /path/to/your/context/tex
ls /path/to/your/context/tex/texmf-osx-64/bin
3. What does
echo $PATH
say (after making sure that . setuptex is executed)?

Mojca
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___