Re: [NTG-context] Stable version

2009-04-30 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 15:50, Mohamed Bana wrote:
> Thank you all!
>
> When was \mainlanguage[ukenglish] added?

Most probably after patterns have been generated out of hyph-utf8.

> Is there an alternative?

Yes, en-gb.

Mojca
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Stable version

2009-04-27 Thread Mohamed Bana

Thank you all!

When was \mainlanguage[ukenglish] added? 


Producer:   luaTeX-0.30.3
CreationDate:   Mon Apr 27 14:48:13 2009
ModDate:ConTeXt - 2008.10.31 13:58

Is there an alternative?

Peter Münster wrote:

On Sat, 25 Apr 2009, Mojca Miklavec wrote:

  

True. We only provide a single version of LuaTeX and "current" (that
often gets broken as well) doesn't work with the latest LuaTeX. I'm
looking forward to nice suggestions about how to solve the issue.



Perhaps just one sentence in the wiki:
If you want to run minimals-current, the you must overwrite your
luatex-binary with an older version. For example like this:
svn cat 
http://svn.contextgarden.net/minimals/bin/tex/linux-64/current/luatex/bin/lua...@xxx
 >`which luatex`

You only need to check, what number XXX should be...

Cheers, Peter

  

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Stable version

2009-04-27 Thread luigi scarso
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 7:49 AM, Peter Münster  wrote:

> On Sat, 25 Apr 2009, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>
> > True. We only provide a single version of LuaTeX and "current" (that
> > often gets broken as well) doesn't work with the latest LuaTeX. I'm
> > looking forward to nice suggestions about how to solve the issue.
>
> Perhaps just one sentence in the wiki:
> If you want to run minimals-current, the you must overwrite your
> luatex-binary with an older version. For example like this:
> svn cat
> http://svn.contextgarden.net/minimals/bin/tex/linux-64/current/luatex/bin/lua...@xxx>`which
>  luatex`
>
> You only need to check, what number XXX should be...
>
> Cheers, Peter
>
with minimals I'm using this luatex :
# luatex
This is LuaTeX, Version snapshot-0.31.3-2008122917 (Web2C 7.5.7)


-- 
luigi
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Stable version

2009-04-26 Thread Peter Münster
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009, Mojca Miklavec wrote:

> True. We only provide a single version of LuaTeX and "current" (that
> often gets broken as well) doesn't work with the latest LuaTeX. I'm
> looking forward to nice suggestions about how to solve the issue.

Perhaps just one sentence in the wiki:
If you want to run minimals-current, the you must overwrite your
luatex-binary with an older version. For example like this:
svn cat 
http://svn.contextgarden.net/minimals/bin/tex/linux-64/current/luatex/bin/lua...@xxx
 >`which luatex`

You only need to check, what number XXX should be...

Cheers, Peter

-- 
Contact information: http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Stable version

2009-04-25 Thread Wolfgang Schuster

Am 25.04.2009 um 22:58 schrieb luigi scarso:


On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:

I think context should complain when a CLI options hasn't been  
spelt correctly:


CLI?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Command-line_interpreter



Thanks but after reading the mail a second time I understood what it  
meant.


(was in scrollmode at the first time :)

Wolfgang

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Stable version

2009-04-25 Thread luigi scarso
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Wolfgang Schuster <
schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com> wrote:

>
> I think context should complain when a CLI options hasn't been spelt
>> correctly:
>>
>
> CLI?
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Command-line_interpreter
-- 
luigi
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Stable version

2009-04-25 Thread Hans Hagen

Mojca Miklavec wrote:

On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 18:12, Mohamed Bana wrote:

Hi guys,

How can i get a somewhat recent and stable version where things just work.
I've tried --stable and --context=stable which both insist of getting luatex
0.40.


True. We only provide a single version of LuaTeX and "current" (that
often gets broken as well) doesn't work with the latest LuaTeX. I'm
looking forward to nice suggestions about how to solve the issue. One
can fetch an "arbitrary" version of LuaTeX from repository, but that's
not convenient.


an option is to have a 0.30 0.40 0.50 etc branch; alongside we can store 
the latest context mkiv that still works on such a version



-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
 tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
 | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Stable version

2009-04-25 Thread Aditya Mahajan

On Sat, 25 Apr 2009, Mojca Miklavec wrote:


On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 18:12, Mohamed Bana wrote:

Hi guys,

How can i get a somewhat recent and stable version where things just work.
I've tried --stable and --context=stable which both insist of getting luatex
0.40.


True. We only provide a single version of LuaTeX and "current" (that
often gets broken as well) doesn't work with the latest LuaTeX. I'm
looking forward to nice suggestions about how to solve the issue. One
can fetch an "arbitrary" version of LuaTeX from repository, but that's
not convenient.


Does it take too much space to also store the old versions of luatex 
binary? After all, we are only talking about the stable releases of 
ConTeXT.


Aditya
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Stable version

2009-04-25 Thread Hans Hagen

Mohamed Bana wrote:

There's a lot of things broken in the current minimals, e.g., bib 
module, hanging, a error about front and I can't to even seem to use OT 
fonts.


bibtex fixing is in progress (at least it runs here)

otf fonts ... well, i use them all day so ...

I think context should complain when a CLI options hasn't been spelt 
correctly:


 $ context --batchmoed


hm, maybe some day but it has a real low priority

Hans

-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
 tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
 | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Stable version

2009-04-25 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 18:12, Mohamed Bana wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> How can i get a somewhat recent and stable version where things just work.
> I've tried --stable and --context=stable which both insist of getting luatex
> 0.40.

True. We only provide a single version of LuaTeX and "current" (that
often gets broken as well) doesn't work with the latest LuaTeX. I'm
looking forward to nice suggestions about how to solve the issue. One
can fetch an "arbitrary" version of LuaTeX from repository, but that's
not convenient.

Mojca
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Stable version

2009-04-25 Thread Wolfgang Schuster


Am 25.04.2009 um 18:12 schrieb Mohamed Bana:


Hi guys,

How can i get a somewhat recent and stable version where things just  
work.
I've tried --stable and --context=stable which both insist of  
getting luatex 0.40.


the names of stable versions is 'current' but you need also a older  
LuaTeX version


mtxrun --verbose --script ./bin/mtx-update.lua --update --make -- 
force --engine=all --context=stable --stable --texroot=$PWD/tex -- 
extras="t-letter,t-mathsets,t-tikz,t-vim" $@


t-letter :)

There's a lot of things broken in the current minimals, e.g., bib  
module, hanging, a error about front and I can't to even seem to use  
OT fonts.


hanging and front?

I think context should complain when a CLI options hasn't been spelt  
correctly:


CLI?

Wolfgang

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


[NTG-context] Stable version

2009-04-25 Thread Mohamed Bana

Hi guys,

How can i get a somewhat recent and stable version where things just work. 

I've tried --stable and --context=stable which both insist of getting 
luatex 0.40.


 mtxrun --verbose --script ./bin/mtx-update.lua --update --make --force 
--engine=all --context=stable --stable --texroot=$PWD/tex 
--extras="t-letter,t-mathsets,t-tikz,t-vim" $@


There's a lot of things broken in the current minimals, e.g., bib 
module, hanging, a error about front and I can't to even seem to use OT 
fonts.


I think context should complain when a CLI options hasn't been spelt 
correctly:


 $ context --batchmoed

Many thanks
Mohamed
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___