On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 01:10:06 +0100
"Mojca Miklavec" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
> > Am 2008-03-03 um 17:44 schrieb Mojca Miklavec:
> >
> > > - or to patch ConTeXt to use xdv2pdf instead of xdvipdfmx + rewrite a
> > > bunch of definitions
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
> Am 2008-03-03 um 17:44 schrieb Mojca Miklavec:
>
> > - or to patch ConTeXt to use xdv2pdf instead of xdvipdfmx + rewrite a
> > bunch of definitions that load Latin Modern (they should not be loaded
> > since xdv2pdf doesn't support "tr
Am 2008-03-03 um 17:44 schrieb Mojca Miklavec:
>> For I never tried XeTeX I don't know if PS Type 1 and 3 will work.
> They do. But the mac Type1 fonts come in some weird format for which
> Jonathan hasn't written support in xdvipdfmx (yet). With xdv2pdf they
> work OK.
As explained, that weird f
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 8:37 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
> Some of your statements seem wrong or at least confusing to me:
>
> Am 2008-03-01 um 13:19 schrieb Roland:
>
>
> > Seems we never posted the conclusion about this problem: XeTeX simply
> > doesn't work with the old Mac Type 1 Postscrip
Some of your statements seem wrong or at least confusing to me:
Am 2008-03-01 um 13:19 schrieb Roland:
> Seems we never posted the conclusion about this problem: XeTeX simply
> doesn't work with the old Mac Type 1 Postscript fonts on Mac OS X
> (Leopard or before). The reason is that these old fo
Le 1 mars 08 à 13:19, Roland a écrit :
> Seems we never posted the conclusion about this problem: XeTeX simply
> doesn't work with the old Mac Type 1 Postscript fonts on Mac OS X
> (Leopard or before). The reason is that these old fonts store their
> data in the resource fork, which Unix utilitie
Seems we never posted the conclusion about this problem: XeTeX simply
doesn't work with the old Mac Type 1 Postscript fonts on Mac OS X
(Leopard or before). The reason is that these old fonts store their
data in the resource fork, which Unix utilities like XeTeX don't see.
Only TrueType or OpenType
Hi Mojca,
Sorry for the late reply. I was travelling extensively. Now I am
trying to pick up this thread again -- here's the text source I used
(with your latest suggestion) and the error produced (see line 100) --
still the same problem I think :-(
1 \starttypescript[serif][eco]
2 \d
On Jan 22, 2008 7:44 AM, Roland wrote:
> Oh well let's try again in that case ;-)
>
> I ran the first test script and it gives the same error (see log 1).
> Then I went back to Wolfgang's recommended script and replaced the
> second typescript block with your suggested lines (the bolditalic font
>
Oh well let's try again in that case ;-)
I ran the first test script and it gives the same error (see log 1).
Then I went back to Wolfgang's recommended script and replaced the
second typescript block with your suggested lines (the bolditalic font
is called Eco302BoldItalic, by the way). This prod
On Jan 22, 2008 12:00 AM, Roland wrote:
> Hi Mojca,
>
> Not quite there yet. I did manage to install the standalone ConTeXt
> without problems after changing the line 18 of that file. I also found
> the same error in setuptex, which of course prevented me from getting
> the right new mktexlsr and t
Hi Mojca,
Not quite there yet. I did manage to install the standalone ConTeXt
without problems after changing the line 18 of that file. I also found
the same error in setuptex, which of course prevented me from getting
the right new mktexlsr and texexec onto the path...
Anyway that's solved now a
On Jan 21, 2008 8:22 AM, Roland wrote:
> Hi Mojca, thanks for the quick answer.
>
> On 20/01/2008, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> > An alternative in to use the standalone ConTeXt. For example by
> > downloading and running
> > http://minimals.contextgarden.net/setup/osx-intel/first-setup.sh and
> > then
Hi Mojca, thanks for the quick answer.
On 20/01/2008, Mojca Miklavec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> An alternative in to use the standalone ConTeXt. For example by
> downloading and running
> http://minimals.contextgarden.net/setup/osx-intel/first-setup.sh and
> then putting something like
> . c
On Jan 20, 2008 9:55 PM, Roland wrote:
> Hi Mojca,
>
> Thanks for your two answers. I guess updating my distribution is the
> first priority--perhaps that is causing all the errors I just posted
> in answer to Wolfgang's suggestion.
>
> I'll try your suggestion and then see if it works, will confir
Hi Mojca,
Thanks for your two answers. I guess updating my distribution is the
first priority--perhaps that is causing all the errors I just posted
in answer to Wolfgang's suggestion.
I'll try your suggestion and then see if it works, will confirm to the
mailing list once I know.
Thanks
Roland
Hi Wolfgang,
Thanks, I tried this. Getting loads of error messages though, see
below. They are repeated multiple times in Textmate, just once when I
try to issue the command "mktextfm Eco101Roman" from the command line.
1 /usr/local/texlive/2007/texmf/web2c/mktexnam: Could not map
source ab
Roland,
I forgot two things so I should better mention some before you ask.
First: welcome to the ConTeXt community.
Second: you need a *recent enough* ConTeXt (anything between october
07-january 08), but if you take the latest one, then you also need the
future version of LM :) And you need a r
On Jan 20, 2008 1:54 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
>
> On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:21:32 +0100
> Roland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am fairly new to both ConTeXt (and XeTeX) but I've already been very
> > impressed with the active user community and the amount of
> > documentation avai
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:21:32 +0100
Roland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am fairly new to both ConTeXt (and XeTeX) but I've already been very
> impressed with the active user community and the amount of
> documentation available, as well as with the sheer userfriendliness of
> ConTeXt whe
Hi,
I am fairly new to both ConTeXt (and XeTeX) but I've already been very
impressed with the active user community and the amount of
documentation available, as well as with the sheer userfriendliness of
ConTeXt when compared to LaTeX. Now I'm trying to get into fonts, but
activating a Postscript
21 matches
Mail list logo
