Dear Aditya,
Thank you for the reply.
>> \startproof
>> \startitemize[n]
>> \item first line.
>> \item second line
>
> Add: \placeclosesymbol here
>
>> \stopitemize
>> \stopproof
>>
>> \stoptext
>
It works in many cases that item content ends with words. But it is not working
if the item co
On Mon, 27 Aug 2018, Jeong Dal wrote:
Hi,
The same thing happens after the itemization as in the following MWE.
\defineenumeration[proof][text=Proof.]
\setupenumeration[proof]
[number=no,
closesymbol=\mathematics{\square},
closecommand=\ifmmode\eqno\else\wordright\fi]
Hi,
I am sorry to bring up old topic “Re: closesymbol on same line as displayed
formula” again.
(ntg-context Digest, Vol 153, Issue 40)
Is there any progress after that?
It seems to me that there is no more discussions about it.
The same thing happens after the itemization as in the following
What has changed, Otared, is that Hans reimplemented inner workings of
displayed formulas and in particular its alignment mechanisms, I suppose.
A few months back he had issued warnings that certain things may break
there.
—Hossein
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 2:51 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist
wrote:
> On
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:46 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Mar 2017, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 7:23 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm bringing up an old question on placing the qedsymbol, or
>>> closesymbol as it is also called. This
> On 20 Mar 2017, at 23:46, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>
>> […]
>
> What is the expected output when the last formula has an equation number?
>
> Aditya
Hi Aditya,
That is a good point: if the equation numbers are on the right, there would be
an ugly effect with the closesympbol near the number,
On Mon, 20 Mar 2017, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 7:23 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
Hi,
I'm bringing up an old question on placing the qedsymbol, or
closesymbol as it is also called. This was previously discussed in
https://mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2014/079
Hi Mikael,
Some time ago, Wolfgang gave a solution which used to work, but I experimented
it again when I read your message, and now it does not work anymore… PLease
have a look to the files attached (I recovered them from a TimeMachine backup).
Unfortnately the same file typeset with the lates
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 7:23 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm bringing up an old question on placing the qedsymbol, or
> closesymbol as it is also called. This was previously discussed in
> https://mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2014/079807.html and the
> purpose of this post is
Hi,
I'm bringing up an old question on placing the qedsymbol, or
closesymbol as it is also called. This was previously discussed in
https://mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2014/079807.html and the
purpose of this post is to ask if there is any solution to the problem
now. Looking at the file
10 matches
Mail list logo
