On 10-6-2010 6:03, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 19:35, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 9-6-2010 3:30, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
I have also noticed the complaint about missing texmf-project. It
should be harmless, but it may be better not to make it look like an
error.
how about adding tex
On 10-6-2010 6:15, luigi scarso wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Mojca Miklavec
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 19:35, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 9-6-2010 3:30, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
I have also noticed the complaint about missing texmf-project. It
should be harmless, but it may be better n
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Mojca Miklavec
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 19:35, Hans Hagen wrote:
>> On 9-6-2010 3:30, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>>
>>> I have also noticed the complaint about missing texmf-project. It
>>> should be harmless, but it may be better not to make it look like an
>>>
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 19:35, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 9-6-2010 3:30, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>
>> I have also noticed the complaint about missing texmf-project. It
>> should be harmless, but it may be better not to make it look like an
>> error.
>
> how about adding texmf-project and texmf-fonts (may
On 9-6-2010 3:30, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
I have also noticed the complaint about missing texmf-project. It
should be harmless, but it may be better not to make it look like an
error.
how about adding texmf-project and texmf-fonts (maybe with a dummy
readme in the root)
Hans
---
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 15:34, Michael Murphy wrote:
> On 09/06/10 15:15, Andreas Schneider wrote:
>
> Seems I spoke too soon: I can indeed get hold of the latest version, but if
> I want an older version (like --context=2010.06.24),
I would like that version too :) :) :) :)
> I run into the same
> Seems I spoke too soon: I can indeed get hold of the latest version, but if I
> want an older version (like --context=2010.06.24), I run into the same
> problem as luigi. And I do want an older version, since for some reason the
> kerning is a bit screwed up on current.
confirm that with ker
On 09/06/10 15:15, Andreas Schneider wrote:
luigi scarso wrote:
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
At least it seems ok now in a fresh install. I just did one
of those, and there is only one thing that I noticed: I had to
run 'texexec --make en' by hand. I don't know if tha
> MTXrun | run: mktexlsr
> sh: mktexlsr: not found
>
> /opt/luatex/minimals-beta-2010/bin/mtxrun:9270: cannot open
> tree:opt/luatex/minimals-beta-2010/tex/texmf-project/: No such
> file or directory
> but texmf-project exists
Oh, right. I wanted to say that as well (but the most important thi
luigi scarso wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>> At least it seems ok now in a fresh install. I just did one
>> of those, and there is only one thing that I noticed: I had to
>> run 'texexec --make en' by hand. I don't know if that is normal?
>>
>> Everything else se
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> At least it seems ok now in a fresh install. I just did one
> of those, and there is only one thing that I noticed: I had to
> run 'texexec --make en' by hand. I don't know if that is normal?
>
> Everything else seems to work fine.
Not here
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 11:01, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
Could you please either fix it in beta, or post the patch to ML?
Does it now work again?
At least it seems ok now in a fresh install. I just did one
of those, and there is only one thing that I noticed: I had to
ru
On 09/06/10 14:02, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 11:01, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
Could you please either fix it in beta, or post the patch to ML?
Does it now work again?
Mojca
Works for me.
--
Michael Murphy
_
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 11:01, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
>
> Could you please either fix it in beta, or post the patch to ML?
Does it now work again?
Mojca
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 16:50, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
>> Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>>
>>> luigi scarso wrote:
On my linux box32bit
$>bash first-setup.sh
stops with
>>> Beta is a tad unstable at the moment, should be better in an hour or so.
>> It seems th
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 16:50, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
> Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>
>> luigi scarso wrote:
>>> On my linux box32bit
>>> $>bash first-setup.sh
>>>
>>> stops with
>> Beta is a tad unstable at the moment, should be better in an hour or so.
> It seems that the real problem is in setup/li
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> luigi scarso wrote:
>> On my linux box32bit
>> $>bash first-setup.sh
>>
>> stops with
> Beta is a tad unstable at the moment, should be better in an hour or so.
It seems that the real problem is in setup/linux-64/bin files which are
rsync'ed by first-run.sh before running
luigi scarso wrote:
On my linux box32bit
$>bash first-setup.sh
stops with
# bash first-setup.sh
receiving file list ... done
sent 37 bytes received 132 bytes 112.67 bytes/sec
total size is 4450786 speedup is 26336.01
MTXrun | fileio: variable 'SELFAUTOLOC' set to
'/opt/luatex/minimals-beta-2
On my linux box32bit
$>bash first-setup.sh
stops with
# bash first-setup.sh
receiving file list ... done
sent 37 bytes received 132 bytes 112.67 bytes/sec
total size is 4450786 speedup is 26336.01
MTXrun | fileio: variable 'SELFAUTOLOC' set to
'/opt/luatex/minimals-beta-2010/bin'
MTXrun | file
19 matches
Mail list logo
