Re: [NTG-context] is there a reason not to fix this bug?

2012-03-18 Thread Pablo Rodríguez
On 12/03/12 08:58, Hans Hagen wrote: On 10-3-2012 21:57, Pablo Rodríguez wrote: Dear community, Wolfgang kindly suggested this fix (that works also with beta from today): strc-lst.mkvi: 1 - comment (for a while) 2 - remove (as no longer relevant) 3 - repair (because broken) it needs

Re: [NTG-context] is there a reason not to fix this bug?

2012-03-12 Thread Hans Hagen
On 10-3-2012 21:57, Pablo Rodríguez wrote: Dear community, Wolfgang kindly suggested this fix (that works also with beta from today): strc-lst.mkvi: 1 - comment (for a while) 2 - remove (as no longer relevant) 3 - repair (because broken) it needs time to choose one and there is only so much

Re: [NTG-context] is there a reason not to fix this bug?

2012-03-12 Thread Hans Hagen
Hi Wolfgang, strc-lst.mkvi: \def\strc_lists_place_indeed#tag#list#settings% + \par ... did you test it with other cases? Technically we can have inline lists. Hans - Hans Hagen |

Re: [NTG-context] is there a reason not to fix this bug?

2012-03-12 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 12.03.2012 um 08:59 schrieb Hans Hagen: Hi Wolfgang, strc-lst.mkvi: \def\strc_lists_place_indeed#tag#list#settings% + \par ... did you test it with other cases? Technically we can have inline lists. Yes it works because the \par is added after the last entry in the paragraph

[NTG-context] is there a reason not to fix this bug?

2012-03-10 Thread Pablo Rodríguez
Dear community, Wolfgang kindly suggested this fix (that works also with beta from today): strc-lst.mkvi: \def\strc_lists_place_indeed#tag#list#settings% {\begingroup \edef\currentlist{#tag}% \setupcurrentlist[#settings]% \the\everystructurelist %