Vit Zyka wrote:
Hans Hagen wrote:
Vit Zyka wrote:
It would be a great news if you succeed to fix it. I cross my fingers.
ok, you can uncross them; see separate mail
Hans
All right, I read this parallel message just now... Perhaps due to I
was working with crossing fingers all the ti
Hans Hagen wrote:
Vit Zyka wrote:
It would be a great news if you succeed to fix it. I cross my fingers.
ok, you can uncross them; see separate mail
Hans
All right, I read this parallel message just now... Perhaps due to I was
working with crossing fingers all the time ;-)
vit
_
Hans Hagen wrote:
Vit Zyka wrote:
Hans Hagen wrote:
Vit Zyka wrote:
It would be a great news if you succeed to fix it. I cross my fingers.
well, it's actually relatively easy to make that (works on my machine
now) but as always .. how to interface best -)
and ... of course it takes
Vit Zyka wrote:
Hans Hagen wrote:
Vit Zyka wrote:
It would be a great news if you succeed to fix it. I cross my fingers.
well, it's actually relatively easy to make that (works on my machine
now) but as always .. how to interface best -)
and ... of course it takes some time to find al
Vit Zyka wrote:
It would be a great news if you succeed to fix it. I cross my fingers.
ok, you can uncross them; see separate mail
Hans
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Hans Hagen wrote:
Vit Zyka wrote:
It would be a great news if you succeed to fix it. I cross my fingers.
well, it's actually relatively easy to make that (works on my machine
now) but as always .. how to interface best -)
and ... of course it takes some time to find all points where
sync
Vit Zyka wrote:
It would be a great news if you succeed to fix it. I cross my fingers.
well, it's actually relatively easy to make that (works on my machine
now) but as always .. how to interface best -)
and ... of course it takes some time to find all points where
synchronization has to t
Hans Hagen wrote:
Vit Zyka wrote:
(Focus on page 1 and 4)
Is there any idea how to fix this?
afaiks, what you get is the markings of the last column
so, it looks like i have to fix something
Hans
Yes, you are right. I check it on a real doc. And if no mark sign is in
the last col, then
Vit Zyka wrote:
(Focus on page 1 and 4)
Is there any idea how to fix this?
afaiks, what you get is the markings of the last column
so, it looks like i have to fix something
Hans
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mai
Dear ConTeXters,
several kind of marking variants (first, last, both, ...) works
perfectly in standard one-column layout:
\definemarking[M]
\startsetups S
default=(\getmarking[M])~
first=(\getmarking[M][first])~
last=(\getmarking[M][l
10 matches
Mail list logo
