On 25-7-2011 12:26, Paul Menzel wrote:
Dear ConTeXt folks,
I just experienced a situation that I wanted to try a module, in this
case TikZ [1][2], and I only had run `./first-setup.sh`, so the module
and “core” were diverted and I got an error message.
! Undefined control sequence.
Am Montag, den 25.07.2011, 09:06 +0200 schrieb Hans Hagen:
On 25-7-2011 12:26, Paul Menzel wrote:
I just experienced a situation that I wanted to try a module, in this
case TikZ [1][2], and I only had run `./first-setup.sh`, so the module
and “core” were diverted and I got an error
Am 25.07.2011 um 12:10 schrieb Paul Menzel:
the updater/installer remembers what you've installed so the next time
the extras will be synchronized along with the core (all or the
selection you've chosen)
Well, then this somehow failed for me. The TikZ module was still from
May 2011 and
Am Montag, den 25.07.2011, 12:14 +0200 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
Am 25.07.2011 um 12:10 schrieb Paul Menzel:
the updater/installer remembers what you've installed so the next time
the extras will be synchronized along with the core (all or the
selection you've chosen)
Well, then
At Monday, 25.07.2011 on 12:31 Paul Menzel wrote:
Thanks, but I think this was not the problem at my end.
`~/.first-setup.sh` is still the one from January, so `extras` worked
for me.
The parameters (and the actual update process) are handled by
bin/mtx-update.lua which is one of the first
That is a bug, not a version mismatch.
Mojca
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Dear ConTeXt folks,
I just experienced a situation that I wanted to try a module, in this
case TikZ [1][2], and I only had run `./first-setup.sh`, so the module
and “core” were diverted and I got an error message.
! Undefined control sequence.
system
