Hi Mojca,
On Friday, July 18, 2008 3:40 PM Mojca Miklavec wrote:
[...]
> Apart from that - is luatex (& cache paths) working now?
sorry for the delay but my new pc is at another location (with no
mailing list access by now) ...
The error messages about writing faults to cache dirs disappeared, an
Peter Rolf wrote:
> Mojca Miklavec schrieb:
>> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Peter Rolf wrote:
>>> i tested the latest luatex ('updated on 2007-07-17') some hours ago and
>>> it still has this problem.
>> Not some hours ago. One hour ago.
>>
> i can rerun the test if you want ;)
>
> new binarie
Mojca Miklavec schrieb:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Peter Rolf wrote:
>> i tested the latest luatex ('updated on 2007-07-17') some hours ago and
>> it still has this problem.
>
> Not some hours ago. One hour ago.
>
i can rerun the test if you want ;)
new binaries will be available at Akira
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Peter Rolf wrote:
>
> i tested the latest luatex ('updated on 2007-07-17') some hours ago and
> it still has this problem.
Not some hours ago. One hour ago.
Mojca
___
If your question
Mojca Miklavec schrieb:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Peter Rolf wrote:
>> Ulrich Dirr schrieb:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Friday, July 18, 2008 10:38 AM Hans Hagen wrote:
this is a bug in the windows lfs code, akira posted a fix so
i expect a new bin any time now
>>> I've just installed Con
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Peter Rolf wrote:
> Ulrich Dirr schrieb:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Friday, July 18, 2008 10:38 AM Hans Hagen wrote:
>>> this is a bug in the windows lfs code, akira posted a fix so
>>> i expect a new bin any time now
>>
>> I've just installed ConTexT minimals on a new pc with
Ulrich Dirr schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> On Friday, July 18, 2008 10:38 AM Hans Hagen wrote:
>> this is a bug in the windows lfs code, akira posted a fix so
>> i expect a new bin any time now
>
> I've just installed ConTexT minimals on a new pc with vista 64 and got
> the 'cache file not writable' messages
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Ulrich Dirr wrote:
>>
>> Will Mojca give us a hint when we can reload/reinstall minimals from
>> contextgarden? Or will it be enough to run the 'first-setup' batch file
>> again?
>
> You don't need to reinstal
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Ulrich Dirr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Friday, July 18, 2008 10:38 AM Hans Hagen wrote:
>> this is a bug in the windows lfs code, akira posted a fix so
>> i expect a new bin any time now
>
> I've just installed ConTexT minimals on a new pc with vista 64 and got
> the 'cach
Hi,
On Friday, July 18, 2008 10:38 AM Hans Hagen wrote:
> this is a bug in the windows lfs code, akira posted a fix so
> i expect a new bin any time now
I've just installed ConTexT minimals on a new pc with vista 64 and got
the 'cache file not writable' messages.
Will Mojca give us a hint when w
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
>> Peter Rolf wrote:
>>
>>> believe me, cache path exists ;)
>> this is a bug in the windows lfs code, akira posted a fix so i expect a
>> new bin any time now
>
> But I fetch luatex stable. If we need to switch to develop
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
>> Peter Rolf wrote:
>>
>>> believe me, cache path exists ;)
>> this is a bug in the windows lfs code, akira posted a fix so i expect a
>> new bin any time now
>
> But I fetch luatex stable. If we need to switch to devel
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>
>>> is 35771 already used by any program?)
>>
>> XeTeX. And I just figured out that I forgot to remove the old one
>> ( kpathsea35671).
>
> maybe binaries should have an accompanying 'liblist.txt' file so that
> it's
Mojca Miklavec schrieb:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Peter Rolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hans Hagen schrieb:
>>> Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hello,
I would like to ask some Windows user to test if windows minimals still
work OK.
>> just tried the current version (onl
Mojca Miklavec schrieb:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Peter Rolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hans Hagen schrieb:
>>> Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hello,
I would like to ask some Windows user to test if windows minimals still
work OK.
>> just tried the current version (onl
Hans Hagen schrieb:
> Peter Rolf wrote:
>
>> believe me, cache path exists ;)
>
> this is a bug in the windows lfs code, akira posted a fix so i expect a
> new bin any time now
>
very good news. will test asap.
> -
>
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> Peter Rolf wrote:
>
>> believe me, cache path exists ;)
>
> this is a bug in the windows lfs code, akira posted a fix so i expect a
> new bin any time now
But I fetch luatex stable. If we need to switch to development
version, let me know.
Moj
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Peter Rolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hans Hagen schrieb:
>>> Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hello,
I would like to ask some Windows user to test if windows minimals still
work OK.
>> just tried the current version (only
Peter Rolf wrote:
> believe me, cache path exists ;)
this is a bug in the windows lfs code, akira posted a fix so i expect a
new bin any time now
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
R
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Peter Rolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hans Hagen schrieb:
>> Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I would like to ask some Windows user to test if windows minimals still
>>> work OK.
>>>
> just tried the current version (only left out texmf-context).
>
> - k
Hans Hagen schrieb:
> Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I would like to ask some Windows user to test if windows minimals still work
>> OK.
>>
just tried the current version (only left out texmf-context).
- kpathsea357.dll is missing ('texexec --make --pdftex' complains about
it; luatex also
> And another issue - TeX Live has switched to universal binaries for
> Mac. Oliver has asked me to do that some time ago, but I didn't want
> to mess up with having to (cross-)compile the basic binaries as well.
> What do others think?
I would really favour universal binaries if we're able to b
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to ask some Windows user to test if windows minimals still work
> OK.
>
> And another issue - TeX Live has switched to universal binaries for
> Mac. Oliver has asked me to do that some time ago, but I didn't want
> to mess up with having to (cross-
Hello,
I would like to ask some Windows user to test if windows minimals still work OK.
And another issue - TeX Live has switched to universal binaries for
Mac. Oliver has asked me to do that some time ago, but I didn't want
to mess up with having to (cross-)compile the basic binaries as well.
Wh
24 matches
Mail list logo
