Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 09.07.2009 um 09:59 schrieb Alan BRASLAU:
On Thursday 09 July 2009 09:38:07 Hans Hagen wrote:
part is just the first level of sectioning and happens to be configured
in such a way that it does not show a title; really nothing special
It is a question of default s
Am 09.07.2009 um 09:59 schrieb Alan BRASLAU:
On Thursday 09 July 2009 09:38:07 Hans Hagen wrote:
part is just the first level of sectioning and happens to be
configured
in such a way that it does not show a title; really nothing special
It is a question of default setup.
\part is configure
On Thursday 09 July 2009 09:38:07 Hans Hagen wrote:
> part is just the first level of sectioning and happens to be configured
> in such a way that it does not show a title; really nothing special
It is a question of default setup.
\part is configured differently : no title, additional page number,
Alan BRASLAU wrote:
In my understanding, \part serves to delimit
logical sections of related chapters, not volumes.
Maybe I am wrong in this interpretation;
maybe \part is to be used to delimit volumes.
Nevertheless, it should be relatively simple
for the basic user to be able to select the desi
Hi Wolfgang
Alan BRASLAU wrote:
In my understanding, \part serves to delimit
logical sections of related chapters, not volumes.
Maybe I am wrong in this interpretation;
maybe \part is to be used to delimit volumes.
Nevertheless, it should be relatively simple
for the basic user to be able to s
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 03.07.2009 um 16:04 schrieb Hans Hagen:
Alan BRASLAU wrote:
In my understanding, \part serves to delimit
logical sections of related chapters, not volumes.
Maybe I am wrong in this interpretation;
maybe \part is to be used to delimit volumes.
Nevertheless, it shou
Alan BRASLAU wrote:
On Friday 03 July 2009 16:04:07 Hans Hagen wrote:
Obsolete in mkii?
Shouldn't basic use (read standard users)
treat source text transparently
between mkii and mkiv?
no, this is one of the few places where there will be a difference; we
have way more control now (also to the
On Friday 03 July 2009 16:04:07 Hans Hagen wrote:
> > Obsolete in mkii?
> > Shouldn't basic use (read standard users)
> > treat source text transparently
> > between mkii and mkiv?
>
> no, this is one of the few places where there will be a difference; we
> have way more control now (also to the de
Am 03.07.2009 um 16:04 schrieb Hans Hagen:
Alan BRASLAU wrote:
In my understanding, \part serves to delimit
logical sections of related chapters, not volumes.
Maybe I am wrong in this interpretation;
maybe \part is to be used to delimit volumes.
Nevertheless, it should be relatively simple
fo
Alan BRASLAU wrote:
In my understanding, \part serves to delimit
logical sections of related chapters, not volumes.
Maybe I am wrong in this interpretation;
maybe \part is to be used to delimit volumes.
Nevertheless, it should be relatively simple
for the basic user to be able to select the desi
In my experience, a \part is generally
(except in some rather technical documents)
not treated as a super-chapter, that is
chapter numbers (and titles) are not reset
and retain their status as if the book was not
divided into parts.
A very long work is commonly broken into "volumes".
Here, each vo
Alan BRASLAU wrote:
On Monday 15 June 2009 10:02:35 Hans Hagen wrote:
I was wondering ... the last time quite some nice small test samples
were posted for testing the structure code
% Example taken from cont-enp.pdf
% However, adding \part{} is problematic...
% (maybe someone can correct this
On Monday 15 June 2009 10:02:35 Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> I was wondering ... the last time quite some nice small test samples
> were posted for testing the structure code
>
% Example taken from cont-enp.pdf
% However, adding \part{} is problematic...
% (maybe someone can correct this?)
%
\setuppagenu
Hi,
I was wondering ... the last time quite some nice small test samples
were posted for testing the structure code
maybe we can set up a repository with such test files (but someone needs
to coordinate it) where they can end up after posting and fixing
possible errors in the examples; we do
14 matches
Mail list logo