Am 23.03.10 22:36, schrieb Hans van der Meer:
I tried this code with both
\setupinmargin[left][...] and \setupinmargin[][...].
The first one worked, the second obviously not. I take it therefore
that the [left]-argument is mandatory.
When the first argument is optional you can write
Must I really understand from your reply that \setupinmargin[x=y] is
not equivalent to \setupinmargin[][x=y]? That is: an absent optional
argument is not really optionally absent?
I checked by running the thing, of course, and the answer I found is
yes. The empty [] does not honor what
Hans van der Meer wrote:
Must I really understand from your reply that \setupinmargin[x=y] is not
equivalent to \setupinmargin[][x=y]? That is: an absent optional
argument is not really optionally absent?
Your [] is not an absent optional argument at all, it is a given
optional argument (that
On 24 mrt 2010, at 16:10, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Hans van der Meer wrote:
Must I really understand from your reply that \setupinmargin[x=y]
is not equivalent to \setupinmargin[][x=y]? That is: an absent
optional argument is not really optionally absent?
Your [] is not an absent optional
Am 24.03.10 16:57, schrieb Hans van der Meer:
Must I really understand from your reply that \setupinmargin[x=y] is
not equivalent to \setupinmargin[][x=y]? That is: an absent optional
argument is not really optionally absent?
Your [] is not an absent optional argument at all, it is a given
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 24.03.10 16:57, schrieb Hans van der Meer:
Must I really understand from your reply that \setupinmargin[x=y] is
not equivalent to \setupinmargin[][x=y]? That is: an absent optional
argument is not really optionally absent?
Your [] is not an absent optional argument
On Wed, Mar 24 2010, Hans van der Meer wrote:
Must I really understand from your reply that \setupinmargin[x=y] is not
equivalent to \setupinmargin[][x=y]? That is: an absent optional argument
is not really optionally absent?
Your [] is not an absent optional argument at all, it is a given
I tested margin notes and may have found a discrepancy with the
(albeit old) manual.
\setupcolors[state=start]
\setupinmargin[][align=right,foregroundcolor=red]
\starttext
ABC\inright{\framed[width=10mm,height=5mm,foregroundcolor=red]{R1}}
\inleft{L1}
\stoptext
This shows un uncolored L1. But
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Hans van der Meer h.vanderm...@uva.nl wrote:
I tested margin notes and may have found a discrepancy with the (albeit old)
manual.
\setupcolors[state=start]
\setupinmargin[][align=right,foregroundcolor=red]
\starttext
Am 23.03.10 19:34, schrieb Hans van der Meer:
I tested margin notes and may have found a discrepancy with the
(albeit old) manual.
\setupcolors[state=start]
In MKIV colors are enabled by default.
\setupinmargin[][align=right,foregroundcolor=red]
All margin texts:
\setupinmargin[color=red]
I tried this code with both
\setupinmargin[left][...] and \setupinmargin[][...].
The first one worked, the second obviously not. I take it therefore
that the [left]-argument is mandatory.
In the manual I have, the \setupinmargin[][] description has its first
argument printed
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Hans van der Meer h.vanderm...@uva.nl wrote:
I tried this code with both
\setupinmargin[left][...] and \setupinmargin[][...].
The first one worked, the second obviously not. I take it therefore that the
[left]-argument is mandatory.
In the manual I
12 matches
Mail list logo
