Re: [NTG-context] Hyphentation/Linebreak after x characters

Hi Rik, thank you as well, this works also nicely. I’ve created a wiki page meanwhile for wrapping text containing both solutions and the post on SHA keys. https://www.contextgarden.net/Wrapping Cheers Benjamin > On 24 Apr 2020, at 00:45, Rik Kabel wrote: > > > > On 4/23/2020 17:50,

Re: [NTG-context] Basic font question (Optima, but no bold, no italics). Standalone ConTeXt does not work. TeX Live 2019 works

> On 24. Apr 2020, at 09:21, Gerben Wierda wrote: > > > I altready did that earlier as per the Wiki information (did not report it) > and just tried again. No difference. Steps to happiness: 1. Extract the ttc font to ttf 2. Copy the ttf files to your local texmf directory 3. reload the

Re: [NTG-context] Basic font question (Optima, but no bold, no italics). Standalone ConTeXt does not work. TeX Live 2019 works

Although this specific issue might have been solved meanwhile by the helpful suggestions of Wolfang, Thomas and others, I would like to point out that I have recently also encountered an odd behaviour of the mtxrun fontloader in the standalone, in which not all typefaces are available/properly

Re: [NTG-context] Basic font question (Optima, but no bold, no italics). Standalone ConTeXt does not work. TeX Live 2019 works

> Am 24.04.2020 um 11:13 schrieb Benjamin Buchmuller > : > > Although this specific issue might have been solved meanwhile by the helpful > suggestions of Wolfang, Thomas and others, I would like to point out that I > have recently also encountered an odd behaviour of the mtxrun fontloader

Re: [NTG-context] Basic font question (Optima, but no bold, no italics). Standalone ConTeXt does not work. TeX Live 2019 works

Hi Hraban, Thanks for the hint (and the proper fontfamily setup), I have forced reload ten times now from various accounts; the issue persists unfortunately. This might confirm Taco‘s notion that there is some bug lmtx. I’m running macOS Catalina too, but as it worked with the standalone of

[NTG-context] complete cover example

Am wondering if anybody has a complete example (explained below) of a book cover: front, spine and back. It doesn't matter how simple or complicated the example. Am one of those people who, once he sees an example, can generally work out the necessary adaptations. By a complete example I mean

[NTG-context] ConTeXt beta issue? Was: Basic font question (Optima, but no bold, no italics). Standalone ConTeXt (beta) does not work. TeX Live 2019 works

As per the fuller console output I included (where you can find all the details of the run as put out by ConTeXt): This is LuaMetaTeX, Version 2.05.01 open source > level 1, order 1, name 'cont-yes.mkiv' system > system > ConTeXt ver: 2020.04.03 10:31 MKIV beta fmt:

Re: [NTG-context] Basic font question (Optima, but no bold, no italics). Standalone ConTeXt does not work. TeX Live 2019 works

> On 24 Apr 2020, at 12:14, Benjamin Buchmuller > wrote: > > Hi Hraban, > > This might confirm Taco‘s notion that there is some bug lmtx. We have moved this off-list for a while. For now, if you have problems with lmtx, just switch back to the regular mkiv standalone. Best wishes, Taco

Re: [NTG-context] Basic font question (Optima, but no bold, no italics). Standalone ConTeXt does not work. TeX Live 2019 works

> On 24 Apr 2020, at 08:53, Wolfgang Schuster > wrote: > > Can you try this: > > \definefontfamily [mainface] [rm] [Optima] > [it=optimaitalic, >bf=optimabold, >bi=optimabolditalic] I altready did that earlier as per the Wiki information (did not report it) and just tried again.

Re: [NTG-context] Basic font question (Optima, but no bold, no italics). Standalone ConTeXt does not work. TeX Live 2019 works

Hi, FYI, my "context mkiv” standalone seems to be fine (latest download). “lmtx” standalone (also latest download) not so much (same problems). Looks like something is broken in ltmx’ TTC parser. OS X Catalina 10.15.4 Taco

Re: [NTG-context] Basic font question (Optima, but no bold, no italics)

> Am 24.04.2020 um 02:10 schrieb Vladimir Lomov : > > > I think Henning Hraban Ramm meant not OS font cache (but may be including it, > I'm not a Mac OS user) but context font cache. Run > > $ mtxrun --script fonts --reload --force > > and try above '--list --all ...' command again No,

Re: [NTG-context] Basic font question (Optima, but no bold, no italics). Standalone ConTeXt does not work. TeX Live 2019 works

> Am 24.04.2020 um 08:48 schrieb Gerben Wierda : > > Then I thought, let’s test some other things. I logged in as another user, > and used ConTeXt from TeX Live 2019: > > > It seems to be that on my system, the standalone installed ConTeXt does not > work with Optima, but the TeX Live

Re: [NTG-context] Basic font question (Optima, but no bold, no italics). Standalone ConTeXt does not work. TeX Live 2019 works

Gerben Wierda schrieb am 24.04.2020 um 08:48: With Arial: \definefontfamily[mainface][rm][Arial] \setupbodyfont[mainface,10pt] with Optima: \definefontfamily[mainface][rm][Optima] \setupbodyfont[mainface,10pt] It doesn’t matter if the font statements are before or after \starttext Then I

Re: [NTG-context] Basic font question (Optima, but no bold, no italics). Standalone ConTeXt does not work. TeX Live 2019 works

With Arial: \definefontfamily[mainface][rm][Arial] \setupbodyfont[mainface,10pt] with Optima: \definefontfamily[mainface][rm][Optima] \setupbodyfont[mainface,10pt] It doesn’t matter if the font statements are before or after \starttext Then I thought, let’s test some other things. I logged

Re: [NTG-context] Basic font question (Optima, but no bold, no italics)

> Am 24.04.2020 um 05:19 schrieb kaddour kardio : > > It's noticed that Optima is a Sans Serif font. > Maybe it conflicts with MacOS way to handle fonts. No, ConTeXt doesn’t care what kind of font you define as rm/ss/tt, and the OS has no say in that. Best, Hraban

Re: [NTG-context] Basic font question (Optima, but no bold, no italics). Standalone ConTeXt does not work. TeX Live 2019 works

See this link: https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Mac_Installation In particular, you need this set of shell commands from that page: mkdir $HOME/context cd $HOME/context rsync -av rsync://contextgarden.net/minimals/setup/first-setup.sh . sh ./first-setup.sh --modules=all --engine=luatex but we

Re: [NTG-context] Basic font question (Optima, but no bold, no italics). Standalone ConTeXt does not work. TeX Live 2019 works

> On 24 Apr 2020, at 11:56, Taco Hoekwater wrote: > > Hi, > > FYI, my "context mkiv” standalone seems to be fine (latest download). > “lmtx” standalone (also latest download) not so much (same problems). Thx. How do I get/install a ‘context mkiv’ standalone? The standalone on

[NTG-context] Negative width vrule ignored in LuaMETATeX

Hi, As I'm beginning to use ConTeXt LMTX, I experimented with it a little and noticed some of my old documents different. After some examination I found the following example: \starttext a\vrule width -5pt height 0pt depth 0pt b \stoptext In LMTX, the result looks as if there is no `\vrule'

Re: [NTG-context] Negative width vrule ignored in LuaMETATeX

SAO Ocean schrieb am 24.04.2020 um 16:42: Hi, As I'm beginning to use ConTeXt LMTX, I experimented with it a little and noticed some of my old documents different. After some examination I found the following example: \starttext a\vrule width -5pt height 0pt depth 0pt b \stoptext In LMTX, the

[NTG-context] Setting vertical spacing of lines inside a \framed[align=]

I have been experimenting with \startpacked..\stoppacked but it doesn’t seem to work. What is the preferred way of getting lines in a normal paragraph (actually, we’re talking about a \framed with align, so a full paragraph in a TeX \vbox) (In addition, I try to find this kind of information

Re: [NTG-context] Setting vertical spacing of lines inside a \framed[align=]

I want the lines in this frame packed more closely together: \starttext \framed[align=flushright,frame=on,offset=none,width=106.400bp]{\setupinterlinespace[0.9]\colored[r=0.000, g=0.000, b=0.000]{\switchtobodyfont[11.0pt] \rm [My]\\Application\\(Component)}} \stoptext I tried a bit of

Re: [NTG-context] Negative width vrule ignored in LuaMETATeX

On 4/24/2020 4:42 PM, SAO Ocean wrote: Hi, As I'm beginning to use ConTeXt LMTX, I experimented with it a little and noticed some of my old documents different. After some examination I found the following example: \starttext a\vrule width -5pt height 0pt depth 0pt b \stoptext In LMTX, the

Re: [NTG-context] Setting vertical spacing of lines inside a \framed[align=]

Gerben Wierda schrieb am 24.04.2020 um 17:38: I have been experimenting with \startpacked..\stoppacked but it doesn’t seem to work. What is the preferred way of getting lines in a normal paragraph (actually, we’re talking about a \framed with align, so a full paragraph in a TeX \vbox) Do you

Re: [NTG-context] Setting vertical spacing of lines inside a \framed[align=]

> On 24. Apr 2020, at 18:19, Gerben Wierda wrote: > > \starttext > > \framed[align=flushright,frame=on,offset=none,width=106.400bp]{\colored[r=0.000, > g=0.000, > b=0.000]{\switchtobodyfont[11.0pt] \setupinterlinespace[20pt] \rm > [My]\\Application\\(Component)}} > > \stoptext > > and if

Re: [NTG-context] Setting vertical spacing of lines inside a \framed[align=]

Thomas A. Schmitz schrieb am 24.04.2020 um 18:40: On 24. Apr 2020, at 18:19, Gerben Wierda wrote: \starttext \framed[align=flushright,frame=on,offset=none,width=106.400bp]{\colored[r=0.000, g=0.000, b=0.000]{\switchtobodyfont[11.0pt] \setupinterlinespace[20pt] \rm

Re: [NTG-context] Negative width vrule ignored in LuaMETATeX

On 4/24/2020 7:44 PM, Ao Shen wrote: Thanks for your timely reply! Hans Hagen 于2020年4月24日周五 下午11:38写道： no, but i must admit that it's kind of a border case ... i'll fix it but also wonder if *no* visual rule showing up is intended (i would then also expect an engine to show a rule .. could

Re: [NTG-context] Setting vertical spacing of lines inside a \framed[align=]

Not possible in my case, unless I redefine them for each use (my code is generated from data with unpredictable colors), hut thanks anyway Gerben Wierda Chess and the Art of Enterprise Architecture Mastering ArchiMate Architecture for Real Enterprises at InfoWorld On Slippery Ice at EAPJ > On

[NTG-context] METAPOST textext() eats my \pars. Was: Setting vertical spacing of lines inside a \framed[align=]

> On 24 Apr 2020, at 18:40, Thomas A. Schmitz > wrote: > > > >> On 24. Apr 2020, at 18:19, Gerben Wierda > > wrote: >> >> \starttext >> >> \framed[align=flushright,frame=on,offset=none,width=106.400bp]{\colored[r=0.000, >>

[NTG-context] Changing the font size in an environment changes the behavior of a macro

Hi, This macro was written by Otared and it works well unless I change the size of the font (see the second graph). How to correct this problem ? Thanks for your help. Fabrice begin example \usemodule[pgfplots] \pgfplotsset{compat=newest}

[NTG-context] METAPOST textext() eats my \pars. Was: Setting vertical spacing of lines inside a \framed[align=]

> On 24 Apr 2020, at 18:40, Thomas A. Schmitz > wrote: > > > >> On 24. Apr 2020, at 18:19, Gerben Wierda > > wrote: >> >> \starttext >> >> \framed[align=flushright,frame=on,offset=none,width=106.400bp]{\colored[r=0.000, >>

[NTG-context] PGFPlots does not work with LMTX

I'm testing LMTX with documents I've written for ConTeXt MKIV. I've copied the third party module folder from ConTeXt and some of them work like a charm (t-vim, TikZ, etc.). Nonetheless, I find PGFPlots just doesn't work. I've tried with the minimal example: \usemodule[pgfplots] \starttext Hola

Re: [NTG-context] PGFPlots does not work with LMTX

That has already been reported on the pgfplots bugtracker https://github.com/pgf-tikz/pgfplots/issues/350 and here on the mailing list https://mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2020/097514.html Here I quote Aditya's workaround: I have no clue what pgfplotsbinary.data.code.tex does, but