Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse{}{} problem

Dear Aditya, Jairo, Wolfgang, and Otared, Thank you for the replies and explanations. I also read the blog. In this case, using '##1’ is an easy way. For more complex table, I may use luacode. Thanks again. Best regards, Dalyoung

Re: [NTG-context] ZapfDingbats Unicode differences MKIV vs LMTX

On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 3:27 PM Hans Hagen wrote: > On 9/21/2020 2:55 PM, Christoph Reller wrote: > > > \definefontsynonym[ZapfDingbats][file:ZapfDingbats][features=dingbats] > > I don't know what the previous line does ... but it works ok here when > you remove it. This line loads the font

Re: [NTG-context] Math fonts for Nimbus fonts

> On 21 Sep 2020, at 16:45, Wolfgang Schuster > wrote: > > Otared Kavian schrieb am 21.09.2020 um 15:30: > […] > I don't understand your problem because you tell ConTeXt to use upright > letters (normal = upright) in math mode with the following setup. > >>

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse{}{} problem

Jeong Dal schrieb am 21.09.2020 um 20:54: Dear Aditya, Jairo, Wolfgang, and Otared, Thank you for the replies and explanations. I also read the blog. In this case, using '##1’ is an easy way. For more complex table, I may use luacode. I forgot the obvious \expanded solution: \starttext

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse{}{} problem

> On 21 Sep 2020, at 16:42, Aditya Mahajan wrote: > > On Mon, 21 Sep 2020, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > >> Aditya Mahajan schrieb am 21.09.2020 um 16:35: >>> […] > > You gave the same reply 11 years ago :-) which is also listed in the blog > post. … Which shows that some things don't change

[NTG-context] \dorecurse{}{} problem

ied version 2020.09.20: Unicode > input works for the "Private Use Area" Unicodes reported in > \ShowCompleteFont. Such Unicodes are, however, not desirable. Moreover, in > MKIV, a Unicode U+2713 (Check Mark) in the input did produce the > ZapfDingbats check, e.g. as follows: > > \de

Re: [NTG-context] Math fonts for Nimbus fonts

Otared Kavian schrieb am 21.09.2020 um 15:30: Hi, I wish to use the Nimbus fonts, but since I didn't know which Math fonts is best adapted to this family, I tried several fonts such as Stix Math, TeX Gyre Math, and so on, but doing this the math-italic does not appear in these fonts: does

Re: [NTG-context] Extreme tables and XML conflict?

Denis Maier schrieb am 21.09.2020 um 16:38: Hi, I'm a bit confused, but this here won't compile: = \startbuffer[test] Test \stopbuffer \startxmlsetups xml:test     \xmlsetsetup{#1}{*}{-}     \xmlsetsetup{#1}{article}{xml:*}    

[NTG-context] How to get the last item from an XML node

Hi struggling again: Shouldn't the code below give me the last element under ? Right now \xmlfilter{#1}{/tr/last()/command(xml:table:tbody:tr)} gives me nothing... (Use case is that I want to have a frame above the table and one bar below. So I think I should wrap the last line in the

Re: [NTG-context] Extreme tables and XML conflict?

On 9/21/2020 4:38 PM, Denis Maier wrote: Hi, I'm a bit confused, but this here won't compile: \startxmlsetups xml:table   \startxtable     \startxrow   \startxcell one \stopxcell   \startxcell two \stopxcell     \stopxrow   \stopxtable \stopxmlsetups when used this way you

Re: [NTG-context] Extreme tables and XML conflict?

Thanks everyone. I'm on the way now. Best, Denis ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse{}{} problem

Aditya Mahajan schrieb am 21.09.2020 um 16:35: On Mon, 21 Sep 2020, Jeong Dal wrote: Hi, I tried to make a table using \dorecurse or \doloop as in the example. There is no error but \recurselevel is not increased, all are 0 in the first example and only two rows are created with the

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse{}{} problem

\getglyph{ZapfDingbats}{\tochar{n:a105}} \par >>>> >>>> Thank you Hans! >>>> Access by glyph index with \tochar{i:19} works well for both MKIV and >>>> LMTX. Access by name with \tochar{n:a39} does not work in LMTX wi

Re: [NTG-context] Extreme tables and XML conflict?

> On 21 Sep 2020, at 16:38, Denis Maier wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm a bit confused, but this here won't compile: > > = > > \startxmlsetups xml:table > \startxtable > \startxrow > \startxcell one \stopxcell > \startxcell two \stopxcell > \stopxrow >

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse{}{} problem

, in > MKIV, a Unicode U+2713 (Check Mark) in the input did produce the > ZapfDingbats check, e.g. as follows: > > \definefontsynonym[ZapfDingbats][file:ZapfDingbats][features=dingbats] > \definefont[zapfdingbats][ZapfDingbats] > \starttext > {\zapfdingbats ✓} > \defin

Re: [NTG-context] 2020 Meeting recordings?

Thanks! But not recordings, right? Am 21.09.2020 um 15:50 schrieb Taco Hoekwater: Hi, Most of the available slides are now integrated with the abstracts page: https://meeting.contextgarden.net/2020/abstracts.shtml Best wishes, Taco On 17 Sep 2020, at 19:03, Marcus Vinicius Mesquita

Re: [NTG-context] Extreme tables and XML conflict?

On 9/21/20 4:38 PM, Denis Maier wrote: Hi, I'm a bit confused, but this here won't compile: xtables manual, chapter 13. Thomas ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the

Re: [NTG-context] 2020 Meeting recordings?

No. I post what I have ;) Taco > On 21 Sep 2020, at 16:40, Denis Maier wrote: > > Thanks! But not recordings, right? > > Am 21.09.2020 um 15:50 schrieb Taco Hoekwater: >> Hi, >> Most of the available slides are now integrated with the abstracts page: >>

Re: [NTG-context] 2020 Meeting recordings?

On 9/21/2020 4:40 PM, Denis Maier wrote: Thanks! But not recordings, right? unlikely ... these meetings are quite informal and (at least I) don't do my presentations with the intention of them being recorded (as i would do them differently then) Hans

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse{}{} problem

On Mon, 21 Sep 2020, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > Aditya Mahajan schrieb am 21.09.2020 um 16:35: > > On Mon, 21 Sep 2020, Jeong Dal wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I tried to make a table using \dorecurse or \doloop as in the example. > > > There is no error but \recurselevel is not increased,

Re: [NTG-context] Extreme tables and XML conflict?

Am 21.09.2020 um 16:50 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster: Denis Maier schrieb am 21.09.2020 um 16:38: Hi, I'm a bit confused, but this here won't compile: [...] \startxmlsetups xml:table     \startembeddedxtable     \startxrow     ...     \stopxrow     \stopembeddedxtable

[NTG-context] Parallel text support

Hi, I'm trying to typeset a parallel text that should appear in columns. The sources are XML, and there I have to use tables for this. So, I thought the easiest way is to use extreme tables for this: = \starttext \dorecurse{3}{\input knuth}

Re: [NTG-context] Old-Style numerals command (\os) breaks conversion of hyphens to dashes

On 9/20/2020 11:14 PM, Art Chimes wrote: I have a fairly large document, 50-60 pp, with lots of numerals, including hundreds of dates. I wanted to see how it would look with old-style numbers and I assumed I could bracket the whole text section of the document within braces and apply the \os

[NTG-context] Arabic support

Hi Just wondering what the current support for Arabic is. Does anyone know? My document works fine for Hebrew and I've just added a new fontfallbac: \definefallbackfamily[mainface][rm][Scheherazade] [range=arabic, force=yes, features=arabic] Bidi is activated with

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse{}{} problem

On Mon, 21 Sep 2020, Jeong Dal wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to make a table using \dorecurse or \doloop as in the example. > There is no error but \recurselevel is not increased, all are 0 in the first > example and only two rows are created with the \recurselevel 0 and 2 only in > the second

[NTG-context] Math fonts for Nimbus fonts

Hi, I wish to use the Nimbus fonts, but since I didn't know which Math fonts is best adapted to this family, I tried several fonts such as Stix Math, TeX Gyre Math, and so on, but doing this the math-italic does not appear in these fonts: does this mean that I have to set explicitely

Re: [NTG-context] ZapfDingbats Unicode differences MKIV vs LMTX

On 9/21/2020 2:55 PM, Christoph Reller wrote: \definefontsynonym[ZapfDingbats][file:ZapfDingbats][features=dingbats] I don't know what the previous line does ... but it works ok here when you remove it. \definefont[zapfdingbats][ZapfDingbats] \starttext {\zapfdingbats ✓}

Re: [NTG-context] Parallel text support

> On 21 Sep 2020, at 12:21, Denis Maier wrote: > > > However, as it turns out, split only seems to mean that the table is split > between rows, individual rows stay on the same page. > > Is there a better approach? I've found the page-streams, but that seems to be > too much…

Re: [NTG-context] ZapfDingbats Unicode differences MKIV vs LMTX

On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 12:04 PM Hans Hagen wrote: > On 9/19/2020 6:18 AM, Christoph Reller wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 4:17 PM Hans Hagen > > wrote: > > > > On 9/18/2020 11:23 AM, Christoph Reller wrote: > > >

Re: [NTG-context] 2020 Meeting recordings?

Hi, Most of the available slides are now integrated with the abstracts page: https://meeting.contextgarden.net/2020/abstracts.shtml Best wishes, Taco > On 17 Sep 2020, at 19:03, Marcus Vinicius Mesquita > wrote: > > So do I. > > Marcus Vinicius > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020, 13:07 Denis Maier

[NTG-context] Extreme tables and XML conflict?

Hi, I'm a bit confused, but this here won't compile: = \startbuffer[test] Test \stopbuffer \startxmlsetups xml:test     \xmlsetsetup{#1}{*}{-}     \xmlsetsetup{#1}{article}{xml:*}     \xmlsetsetup{#1}{table[@content-type!='parallel']}{xml:table}     \stopxmlsetups