Re: [NTG-context] Table width trouble

2006-04-26 Thread nico
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 00:11:56 +0200, Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > nico wrote: >> On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 18:28:20 +0200, Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>> nico wrote: >>> Hello, I come back with that damn table test case. With release 2006.04.22: [...]

Re: [NTG-context] Table width trouble

2006-04-25 Thread Hans Hagen
nico wrote: > On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 18:28:20 +0200, Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> nico wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I come back with that damn table test case. With release 2006.04.22: >>> [...] >>> >>> >>> >> \long\def\dohandleTBLcellA#1#2[#3]#4% >> > > Thanks, i

Re: [NTG-context] Table width trouble

2006-04-23 Thread nico
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 18:28:20 +0200, Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > nico wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I come back with that damn table test case. With release 2006.04.22: >> [...] >> >> > \long\def\dohandleTBLcellA#1#2[#3]#4% Thanks, it does it. Another torture case: when column widths are pa

Re: [NTG-context] Table width trouble

2006-04-23 Thread Hans Hagen
nico wrote: > Hello, > > I come back with that damn table test case. With release 2006.04.22: > > - it works fine when the column width is passed as table option, > - it's wrong when the width is passed via a column setup only, > - it works ok when both table and column option are passed, and it's

[NTG-context] Table width trouble

2006-04-22 Thread nico
Hello, I come back with that damn table test case. With release 2006.04.22: - it works fine when the column width is passed as table option, - it's wrong when the width is passed via a column setup only, - it works ok when both table and column option are passed, and it's the column option that