Dear all,
Today, I updated ConTeXt Minimal using first-setup.sh in my Mac.
I compiled a file which was compiled well before update.
But I got a strange result in the output.
All english sentences are shown well except korean sentences. In the log file,
...
systems : end file myBstyle at line 4
(/Users/graph/ConTeXtMini/tex/texmf-local/tex/context/type-kor.tex)
!define font: font with name unbatangRegular is not found
!define font: unknown font unbatangRegular, loading aborted
!define font: unable to define unbatangRegular as \*Myface12ptrmtf*
systems : begin file geo-euclid at line 11
(/Users/graph/Documents/Mathematics/geometry/geo-euclid.tex
structure : chapter @ level 2 : 0.1 - Euclidean Geoemtry
!define font: font with name unbatangRegular is not found
!define font: unknown font unbatangRegular, loading aborted
!define font: unable to define unbatangRegular as \*Myface12ptrmtfc*
!define font: font with name unbatangRegular is not found
...
There is no change in the typescript file and the location of the fonts.
Here is a part of typescript file type-kor defining unbatangRegular;
% unfonts batang
\starttypescript[serif][unbatang][uc]
% Regular variant:
\definefontsynonym[unbatangRegular][file:UnBatang.ttf][encoding=uc]
\definefontsynonym[unbatangBold][file:UnBatangBold.ttf][encoding=uc]
\definefontsynonym[unbatangItalic][file:UnGraphic.ttf][encoding=uc]
\definefontsynonym[unbatangBoldItalic][file:UnGraphicBold.ttf] [encoding=uc]
\stoptypescript
% mid-level names:
\starttypescript[serif][unbatang][name]
\definefontsynonym[Serif][unbatangRegular]
\definefontsynonym[SerifBold][unbatangBold]
\definefontsynonym[SerifItalic][unbatangItalic]
\definefontsynonym[SerifBoldItalic][unbatangBoldItalic]
% The fallbacks
\definefontsynonym[SerifSlanted][Serif]
\definefontsynonym[SerifBoldSlanted][SerifBold]
\definefontsynonym[SerifCaps][Serif]
\stoptypescript
...
More interesting thing is that korean defined as bold face is shown. So I
change the whole text as bold using {\bf whole text (english + korean)}, then
every sentences is clearly shown in bold face. I checked luatools
UnBatang.ttf which is defined as unbatangregular, it locates where it is.
ConTeXtMini graph$ luatools UnBatang.ttf
/Users/graph/Library/Fonts/UnBatang.ttf
Both current version and ConTeXt ver: 2010.05.24 13:05 MKIV fmt: 2010.5.27
int: english/english version work same.
Why isn't it able to define unbatangRegular while it can use the
unbatangBold?
I am using Mac, ConTeXtMinimal.
Thank you.
Best regards,
Dalyoung
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
