Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse{}{} problem

Dear Aditya, Jairo, Wolfgang, and Otared, Thank you for the replies and explanations. I also read the blog. In this case, using '##1’ is an easy way. For more complex table, I may use luacode. Thanks again. Best regards, Dalyoung

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse{}{} problem

Jeong Dal schrieb am 21.09.2020 um 20:54: Dear Aditya, Jairo, Wolfgang, and Otared, Thank you for the replies and explanations. I also read the blog. In this case, using '##1’ is an easy way. For more complex table, I may use luacode. I forgot the obvious \expanded solution: \starttext

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse{}{} problem

> On 21 Sep 2020, at 16:42, Aditya Mahajan wrote: > > On Mon, 21 Sep 2020, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > >> Aditya Mahajan schrieb am 21.09.2020 um 16:35: >>> […] > > You gave the same reply 11 years ago :-) which is also listed in the blog > post. … Which shows that some things don't change

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse{}{} problem

On Mon, 21 Sep 2020, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > Aditya Mahajan schrieb am 21.09.2020 um 16:35: > > On Mon, 21 Sep 2020, Jeong Dal wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I tried to make a table using \dorecurse or \doloop as in the example. > > > There is no error but \recurselevel is not increased,

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse{}{} problem

Hi Dalyoung, I don't know why \recurselevel returns 0 inside a tabulate environment, but the following works fine: \starttext \startxtable[frame=off,bottomframe=on,width=1cm,align={middle,lohi}] \startxrow\startxcell \stopxcell\stopxrow % just to have a line on the top of the first row

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse{}{} problem

Aditya Mahajan schrieb am 21.09.2020 um 16:35: On Mon, 21 Sep 2020, Jeong Dal wrote: Hi, I tried to make a table using \dorecurse or \doloop as in the example. There is no error but \recurselevel is not increased, all are 0 in the first example and only two rows are created with the

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse{}{} problem

Hi, Using ##1 instead of \recurselevel makes it work in this specific case if you want a quick and dirty solution. It seems to be a thing with nesting, as using #1 complains. I'd prefer the solutions as shown by Aditya: constructing tables via Lua, etc. Regards, Jairo El lun., 21 de sep. de

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse{}{} problem

On Mon, 21 Sep 2020, Jeong Dal wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to make a table using \dorecurse or \doloop as in the example. > There is no error but \recurselevel is not increased, all are 0 in the first > example and only two rows are created with the \recurselevel 0 and 2 only in > the second

Re: [NTG-context] dorecurse problem

> On 20 Jan 2017, at 18:00, Rik Kabel wrote: > […] > > Otared, > > I am not sure what you are doing, but if you are using only the code snippet > that Hans posted, you will get a blank page. You have to define the layer and > page background in addition to Hans'

Re: [NTG-context] dorecurse problem

On 2017-01-20 11:42, Otared Kavian wrote: Hi Hans, Unfortunately your workaround with \getbuffer does not produce the correct page: it gives only a blank page. Thanks for your attention: OK On 20 Jan 2017, at 10:08, Hans Hagen wrote: On 1/20/2017 8:59 AM, Aditya Mahajan

Re: [NTG-context] dorecurse problem

Hi Hans, Unfortunately your workaround with \getbuffer does not produce the correct page: it gives only a blank page. Thanks for your attention: OK > On 20 Jan 2017, at 10:08, Hans Hagen wrote: > > On 1/20/2017 8:59 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote: >> On Thu, 19 Jan 2017, Rik Kabel

Re: [NTG-context] dorecurse problem

On 1/20/2017 8:59 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Thu, 19 Jan 2017, Rik Kabel wrote: ConTeXters, When \dorecurse is active in the following MWE, the lines of text are overprinted. At least, this is the case for me, please confirm it for yourself. When \dorecurse is disabled, the lines print as

Re: [NTG-context] dorecurse problem

On Thu, 19 Jan 2017, Rik Kabel wrote: ConTeXters, When \dorecurse is active in the following MWE, the lines of text are overprinted. At least, this is the case for me, please confirm it for yourself. When \dorecurse is disabled, the lines print as they should, separately. Please tell me

Re: [NTG-context] dorecurse problem

Hi Rik, I can confirm the behaviour you are reporting (even without \startstandardmakeup—\stopstandardmakeup, but adding a line of text in the document in order to have an output). It seems that \dorecurse suppresses the passage to another line, since if one says \dorecurse{10} the texts in