This can be corrected by changing the \vbox in the definition of
\startmathlines to \vtop. This can be made configurable by adding a
location key. Here is a complete example
\unprotect
\def\startmathlines
{\def\s...@math{$}
\def\NC{}
\def\NR{\def\NC{\cr}}
% Hack for number. Should be done by me
Is there any progress on this? I notice it is not yet in the core. I'm in
need of an AMSL split-like environment but the above doesn't work entirely
as expected. Below is an example.
Any ideas?
Thanks, Dave
\placeformula
\startformula \startalign
\NC \sigma_{L_s}^2
\NC= E\left\{ \eps_L^
On Mon, 24 Mar 2008, Hans Hagen wrote:
> Morgan Brassel wrote:
>
>> Sorry that I can't help you with the implementation, Aditya... I just want
>> to confirm that your new macro perfectly fits my needs. I hope it will
>> make it into the core, it really is useful!
>
> once aditya is confident that
Morgan Brassel wrote:
> Sorry that I can't help you with the implementation, Aditya... I just want
> to confirm that your new macro perfectly fits my needs. I hope it will
> make it into the core, it really is useful!
once aditya is confident that it makes sense and works as expected it
will p
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Morgan Brassel wrote:
>> 3) Aditya, I saw your remark in your 'My Way' concerning the 'multline'
>> environment. I must admit I would really be glad to see it appear in
>> ConTeXt! I'm afraid I'm not able to implement it myself...
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Morgan Brassel wrote:
> 3) Aditya, I saw your remark in your 'My Way' concerning the 'multline'
> environment. I must admit I would really be glad to see it appear in
> ConTeXt! I'm afraid I'm not able to implement it myself... I use it a
> lot with amsmath: when a formula is j
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:48:55 -0400 (EDT)
> Aditya Mahajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Morgan Brassel wrote:
>>
>>> Concerning multline, I only read the specification given in amsldoc.pdf:
>>> "3.3 Split equations without alig
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:48:55 -0400 (EDT)
Aditya Mahajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Morgan Brassel wrote:
>
> > Concerning multline, I only read the specification given in amsldoc.pdf:
> > "3.3 Split equations without alignment". Multline does not support
> > alignment,
> >
Le Friday 14 March 2008 00:48:55 Aditya Mahajan, vous avez écrit :
> So, will this user interface be enough:
>
> \startformula \startmultline
>\NC line 1 \FR
>\NC line 2 \MR
>\NC line 3 \LR
> \stopmultline \stopformula
>
> Lines with \FR are flush left, lines with \MR are centered, and
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Morgan Brassel wrote:
> Concerning multline, I only read the specification given in amsldoc.pdf:
> "3.3 Split equations without alignment". Multline does not support alignment,
> so you can't put '&' inside it, only '\\'. All it does is cut the equation
> into several lines: t
Le Thursday 13 March 2008 13:23:06 Aditya Mahajan, vous avez écrit :
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Morgan Brassel wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I read carefully the two 'My Way' from Aditya regarding math alignment
> > (thank you for those, they were extremely useful to me, and should maybe
> > get even
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Morgan Brassel wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I read carefully the two 'My Way' from Aditya regarding math alignment
> (thank you for those, they were extremely useful to me, and should maybe
> get even more visibility on the wiki), and I have some questions about
> it:
>
>
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
