>
>
>
> Subject:
> Re: [NTG-context] Bibliographic Databases
> From:
> Robin Kirkham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date:
> Sun, 20 Apr 2008 19:13:28 +1000
> To:
> ntg-context@ntg.nl
>
> To:
> ntg-context@ntg.nl
>
>
> On 20 Ap
Taco Hoekwater elvenkind.com> writes:
[snip]
> But the few times I've had to work with TEI stuff I found that you
> can easily get much more than you bargained for. Bibliographic data
> is not easy on its own, and a format that allows (almost promotes)
> extra tags to be embedded also is not hel
Taco Hoekwater elvenkind.com> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> Andreas Wagner wrote:
> > Just out of curiosity: What are your reasons for preferring this over TEI:
>
> MODS was a logical choice mostly my background (scientific publishers
> => MARC databases => MODS), and that BruceD'Arcus liked it. Btw,
>
On 20 April 2008, "George N. White III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Robin Kirkham
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I want to set up a shared bibliographic reference database for my
>> research group, [...]
>
> I can tell you a few things that don't work! In
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Robin Kirkham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I want to set up a shared bibliographic reference database for my
> research group, and I'm looking at software like refbase http://
> refbase.sourceforge.net/ or refdb http://refdb.sourceforge.net/ to
>
Hello Taco, hello list,
* Taco Hoekwater wrote on Apr/18/2008:
> Andreas Wagner wrote:
>> Just out of curiosity: What are your reasons for preferring this over TEI:
>
> MODS was a logical choice mostly my background (scientific publishers
> => MARC databases => MODS), and that BruceD'Arcus liked
Hi,
Andreas Wagner wrote:
> Just out of curiosity: What are your reasons for preferring this over TEI:
MODS was a logical choice mostly my background (scientific publishers
=> MARC databases => MODS), and that BruceD'Arcus liked it. Btw,
his blog is full of bibliographic articles, if you are int
Hello Taco, hello list,
* Taco Hoekwater wrote on Apr/18/2008:
> if you want to be ready for the future, find a reference manager that can
> export to MODS:
>
> http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/
Just out of curiosity: What are your reasons for preferring this over TEI:
http://www.tei-c.org/r
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Taco Hoekwater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Robin Kirkham wrote:
> > Does anyone have any experience or advice to offer in using such
> > things, and hooking them up to ConTeXt? Most of these systems will
> > of course emit a .bib file which will obviously wor
Robin Kirkham wrote:
> Does anyone have any experience or advice to offer in using such
> things, and hooking them up to ConTeXt? Most of these systems will
> of course emit a .bib file which will obviously work, but will any
Please have a look at the biblographic module. It comes with it
Hello Robin, hello list,
* Robin Kirkham wrote on Apr/18/2008:
> I want to set up a shared bibliographic reference database for my research
> group, and I'm looking at
> software like refbase http://refbase.sourceforge.net/ or refdb
> http://refdb.sourceforge.net/ to replace
> the somewhat r
11 matches
Mail list logo
