Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt name/branding

2010-04-27 Thread Patrick Gundlach
Hi Scott, that's a good idea, we should rename it to 'latex 3'. That name is still free and it would fill the expectations of almost all TeX users out there. Patrick ___ If your question is of interest to others as

Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt name/branding

2010-04-27 Thread luigi scarso
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Patrick Gundlach patr...@gundla.ch wrote: Hi Scott, that's a good idea, we should rename it to 'latex 3'. That name is still free and it would fill the expectations of almost all TeX users out there. '3' seems to be unfortunate. What about L(u)ATeX-mkiv ?

Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt name/branding

2010-04-27 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:27, Patrick Gundlach wrote: Hi Scott, that's a good idea, we should rename it to 'latex 3'. That name is still free and it would fill the expectations of almost all TeX users out there. +1 And I'm sure that the number of users would greatly increase :) :) :)

Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt name/branding

2010-04-27 Thread Tobias Burnus
On 04/27/2010 10:48 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:27, Patrick Gundlach wrote: Hi Scott, that's a good idea, we should rename it to 'latex 3'. That name is still free and it would fill the expectations of almost all TeX users out there. +1 I think you

Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt name/branding

2010-04-27 Thread Vedran Miletić
2010/4/27 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de: I think you err. LaTeX 3 is already taken (http://www.latex-project.org/latex3.html) - how about LaTeX IV? This one actually sounds good! -- Vedran Miletić ___ If your

Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt name/branding

2010-04-27 Thread Hans Hagen
On 27-4-2010 11:31, Vedran Miletić wrote: 2010/4/27 Tobias Burnusbur...@net-b.de: I think you err. LaTeX 3 is already taken (http://www.latex-project.org/latex3.html) - how about LaTeX IV? This one actually sounds good! but given the original post it then should be latex iv i.e. no funny

Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt name/branding

2010-04-27 Thread Khaled Hosny
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:35:37AM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote: On 27-4-2010 11:31, Vedran Miletić wrote: 2010/4/27 Tobias Burnusbur...@net-b.de: I think you err. LaTeX 3 is already taken (http://www.latex-project.org/latex3.html) - how about LaTeX IV? This one actually sounds good! but

Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt name/branding

2010-04-27 Thread Procházka Lukáš Ing . - Pontex s . r . o .
Hello, my opinion is that ConTeXt including capitalization of some preselected letters is OK. Imagine - how new mode of work brings ConTeXt (and other TeX family) to someone who knows only or has been working with Word before! If it's to much to someone to remember correct ConTeXt writing

Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt name/branding

2010-04-27 Thread Arthur Reutenauer
or to use \context macro - I never used it before, so I'm not sure whether such a macro exists; if it doesn't, it might be useful to define it; like \LaTeX in LaTeX It's actually \CONTEXT, all uppercase. Arthur

Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt name/branding

2010-04-26 Thread Hans Hagen
On 27-4-2010 12:41, Scott Steele wrote: Sidenote: If anyone has ever considered changing the name of the ConTeXt project, I'd like to support that. Name consistency is important, but there are two unnecessary problems that the current name creates. the implication of a name change is quite big