Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt name/branding

2010-04-27 Thread Patrick Gundlach
Hi Scott,

that's a good idea, we should rename it to 'latex 3'. That name is still free 
and it would fill the expectations of almost all TeX users out there.

Patrick

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt name/branding

2010-04-27 Thread luigi scarso
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Patrick Gundlach patr...@gundla.ch wrote:
 Hi Scott,

 that's a good idea, we should rename it to 'latex 3'. That name is still free 
 and it would fill the expectations of almost all TeX users out there.

'3' seems to be unfortunate.

What about L(u)ATeX-mkiv ?

-- 
luigi
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt name/branding

2010-04-27 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:27, Patrick Gundlach wrote:
 Hi Scott,

 that's a good idea, we should rename it to 'latex 3'. That name is still free 
 and it would fill the expectations of almost all TeX users out there.

+1

And I'm sure that the number of users would greatly increase :) :) :)

Whenever I tell someone that I'm not using LaTeX any more and that I
use something better instead, nobody ever believes me. (There cannot
exist any program that's better than LaTeX. That's one of the first
few axioms in mathematics :)

If I told them I was using LaTeX 3, it would gain everyone's attention
and everyone would want to see how it looks (still LaTeX, but probably
better since it carries a bigger version number).

Mojca
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt name/branding

2010-04-27 Thread Tobias Burnus
On 04/27/2010 10:48 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
 On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:27, Patrick Gundlach wrote:
   
 Hi Scott,

 that's a good idea, we should rename it to 'latex 3'. That name is still 
 free and it would fill the expectations of almost all TeX users out there.
 
 +1
   
I think you err. LaTeX 3 is already taken
(http://www.latex-project.org/latex3.html) - how about LaTeX IV?

Tobias
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt name/branding

2010-04-27 Thread Vedran Miletić
2010/4/27 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de:
 I think you err. LaTeX 3 is already taken
 (http://www.latex-project.org/latex3.html) - how about LaTeX IV?


This one actually sounds good!

-- 
Vedran Miletić
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt name/branding

2010-04-27 Thread Hans Hagen

On 27-4-2010 11:31, Vedran Miletić wrote:

2010/4/27 Tobias Burnusbur...@net-b.de:

I think you err. LaTeX 3 is already taken
(http://www.latex-project.org/latex3.html) - how about LaTeX IV?



This one actually sounds good!


but given the original post it then should be latex iv i.e. no funny 
uppercase



-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
 | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt name/branding

2010-04-27 Thread Khaled Hosny
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:35:37AM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
 On 27-4-2010 11:31, Vedran Miletić wrote:
 2010/4/27 Tobias Burnusbur...@net-b.de:
 I think you err. LaTeX 3 is already taken
 (http://www.latex-project.org/latex3.html) - how about LaTeX IV?
 
 
 This one actually sounds good!
 
 but given the original post it then should be latex iv i.e. no
 funny uppercase

Metatex IV Pro, this sounds professional (the non-pro can be the plain 
variant).

-- 
 Khaled Hosny
 Arabic localiser and member of Arabeyes.org team
 Free font developer
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt name/branding

2010-04-27 Thread Procházka Lukáš Ing . - Pontex s . r . o .

Hello,

my opinion is that ConTeXt including capitalization of some preselected letters 
is OK.

Imagine - how new mode of work brings ConTeXt (and other TeX family) to someone 
who knows only or has been working with Word before!

If it's to much to someone to remember correct ConTeXt writing (or to use \context 
macro - I never used it before, so I'm not sure whether such a macro exists; if it doesn't, it 
might be useful to define it; like \LaTeX in LaTeX), than it's probable one will not want to 
see-through the whole typesetting system (and more, ConTeXt may be a bit simpler for 
usage than LaTeX) and to learn how to typeset in this system (as he may be used to click an icon by 
mouse to get the required operation).

Also - if someone sees ConTeXt written, he may ask why some letters are capitalized. Especially seeing TeX should 
be preserved as it demonstrates relation to TeX; first letter uppercase (C) is common in (majority) of program 
names; and thus I'd keep the whole ConTeXt as I feel it as a mark.

Please take all above as my personal opinion; I don't like to touch anyone's 
point of view.

Lukas

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt name/branding

2010-04-27 Thread Arthur Reutenauer
 or to use \context macro - I never used it before, so I'm not sure whether 
 such a macro exists; if it doesn't, it might be useful to define it; like 
 \LaTeX in LaTeX

  It's actually \CONTEXT, all uppercase.

Arthur
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt name/branding

2010-04-26 Thread Hans Hagen

On 27-4-2010 12:41, Scott Steele wrote:

Sidenote: If anyone has ever considered changing the name of the ConTeXt
project, I'd like to support that. Name consistency is important, but there
are two unnecessary problems that the current name creates.


the implication of a name change is quite big


The first is that the unusual capitalization and pronunciation are a barrier
to new users. I've used macro packages in the TeX family for about four
years now (though it seems much longer! I can't believe for how long I was
putting out such ugly papers!), but I'm now consciously trying to remember
to pronounce them as tecks, latecks, zeetecks, conteckst, etc, and to type
them as Tex, Latex, Xetex, and Context (outside of this message/forum). The
odd capitalization doen't win fans among people who appreciate typographic
tradition, and the pronunciation requires that, instead of explaining first
how powerful and useful these systems are, one explain the Greek chi and
Donald Knuth. It doesn't give a good impression when one's first exposure to
TeX involves being told one is wrong in how one pronounces a word that is
less than 40 years old (The same goes for many open source projects).
Further, if the name is brought up in conversation and piques the interest
of a potential user, they will have a difficult time later searching for it
when they type in contekt or conteckt.


well, nobody here cares much if you type ConTeXt as CONTEXT (small caps) 
or context (verbatim or whatever)


concerning the pronouciation ... the x is not like in tex, it's just x 
(ks or whatever) ... we're not that picky and there are no rules other 
than that it should look right in your text if you refer to it



The second problem with the ConTeXt name is its shared spelling with
context. When I google context and font, I get so many pages imploring me to
consider the context of my document when choosing between Arial, Times New
Roman, and Comic Sans. Many of the things I'll be searching for while using
ConTeXt yield thousands of irrelevant pages because of how context can pop
up in so many topics that share major keywords with the typesetting process..


well, googling on latex is also somewhat special ... as we now have 
context mkiv, you have a better change for a hit



Of course, I myself am in no position to advocate a name change, and if the
two issues I listed are the price for having a cutting-edge typesetting
system, then I'm still a pretty happy camper. But if any of the people who
have actually worked really hard to put this together have ever thought
about bringing up a branding change, here's my two pence.


changing a name will bring way to much work with it (changing web pages, 
manuals, filenames, lots of code, script names, habits etc)


Hans

-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
 | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___