Re: [NTG-context] Font Awesome (again)
Hello! That was it, I forgot rule one: update your ConTeXt before asking questions. I updated to newest current and everything started working. Thank you, Mari On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 2:59 PM Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > > Hi Mari, > > you have to update your installation because fontawesome 5 uses a new > machanism > to load the symbols from the font files. The first version of the > mechanism from August > did only work when you enabled the symbol set for the whole document and > extended > support was added in September. > > Wolfgang > > > Mari Voipio schrieb am 01.11.18 um 13:51: > > Hi Wolfgang et al, > > > > I did some more research into this. > > > > If I put \symbol after \showsymbolset, the font gets loaded and the > > symbols show up as expected. If I put \symbol before \showsymbolset, > > the font seems to get loaded, but instead of the symbol I get its name > > printed. If I remove the \showsymbolset commands altogether, the > > correct font doesn't get loaded at all (as far as I understand from > > the log) and understandably I get no symbols then. I didn't touch the > > stuff above \starttext, just moved the \symbol commands around. > > As far as I can tell, the font is properly installed and ConTeXt finds > > it (otherwise \showsymbolset wouldn't work, I think). But I've got a > > nagging feeling I'm missing something somewhere else. Unfortunately > > I'm on thin ice here, fonts really aren't my forte. > > > > Mari > > On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 1:45 PM Wolfgang Schuster > > wrote: > >> Mari Voipio schrieb am 01.11.18 um 12:04: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I'm trying to get Font Awesome 5 to work for me, but it only almost does. > >>> > >>> Wolfgang's code works and I get a nice list of symbols for all three > >>> variations, so ConTeXt obviously finds the font. But when I try to use > >>> a single symbol, ConTeXt prints the symbol name instead of the symbol. > >>> There must be something I'm overlooking, but I don't know what. Wiki > >>> wasn't very helpful, although we do have an entry on symbols (Font > >>> Awesome, on the other hand, isn't mentioned anywhere on the wiki). > >>> > >>> I tried with \symbol[fontawesome-regular][credit-card] (at the end of > >>> my file) and a few variants thereof, but couldn't get the symbol. What > >>> am I doing wrong? What have I missed? > >> Since you didn’t provide a example it’s difficult to tell what’s wrong > >> for you > >> but the following example works for me. > >> > >> Don’t forget to put the files for fontawesome 5 in a folder where > >> ConTeXt can find them. > >> > >> > >> \usesymbols[fontawesome] > >> > >> \starttext > >> > >> \symbol[fontawesome-regular][credit-card] > >> > >> \symbol[fontawesome-solid][credit-card] > >> > >> \stoptext > >> > >> > >> Wolfgang > ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Font Awesome (again)
Hi Mari, you have to update your installation because fontawesome 5 uses a new machanism to load the symbols from the font files. The first version of the mechanism from August did only work when you enabled the symbol set for the whole document and extended support was added in September. Wolfgang Mari Voipio schrieb am 01.11.18 um 13:51: Hi Wolfgang et al, I did some more research into this. If I put \symbol after \showsymbolset, the font gets loaded and the symbols show up as expected. If I put \symbol before \showsymbolset, the font seems to get loaded, but instead of the symbol I get its name printed. If I remove the \showsymbolset commands altogether, the correct font doesn't get loaded at all (as far as I understand from the log) and understandably I get no symbols then. I didn't touch the stuff above \starttext, just moved the \symbol commands around. As far as I can tell, the font is properly installed and ConTeXt finds it (otherwise \showsymbolset wouldn't work, I think). But I've got a nagging feeling I'm missing something somewhere else. Unfortunately I'm on thin ice here, fonts really aren't my forte. Mari On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 1:45 PM Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Mari Voipio schrieb am 01.11.18 um 12:04: Hi, I'm trying to get Font Awesome 5 to work for me, but it only almost does. Wolfgang's code works and I get a nice list of symbols for all three variations, so ConTeXt obviously finds the font. But when I try to use a single symbol, ConTeXt prints the symbol name instead of the symbol. There must be something I'm overlooking, but I don't know what. Wiki wasn't very helpful, although we do have an entry on symbols (Font Awesome, on the other hand, isn't mentioned anywhere on the wiki). I tried with \symbol[fontawesome-regular][credit-card] (at the end of my file) and a few variants thereof, but couldn't get the symbol. What am I doing wrong? What have I missed? Since you didn’t provide a example it’s difficult to tell what’s wrong for you but the following example works for me. Don’t forget to put the files for fontawesome 5 in a folder where ConTeXt can find them. \usesymbols[fontawesome] \starttext \symbol[fontawesome-regular][credit-card] \symbol[fontawesome-solid][credit-card] \stoptext Wolfgang ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Font Awesome (again)
Mari Voipio schrieb am 01.11.18 um 12:04: Hi, I'm trying to get Font Awesome 5 to work for me, but it only almost does. Wolfgang's code works and I get a nice list of symbols for all three variations, so ConTeXt obviously finds the font. But when I try to use a single symbol, ConTeXt prints the symbol name instead of the symbol. There must be something I'm overlooking, but I don't know what. Wiki wasn't very helpful, although we do have an entry on symbols (Font Awesome, on the other hand, isn't mentioned anywhere on the wiki). I tried with \symbol[fontawesome-regular][credit-card] (at the end of my file) and a few variants thereof, but couldn't get the symbol. What am I doing wrong? What have I missed? Since you didn’t provide a example it’s difficult to tell what’s wrong for you but the following example works for me. Don’t forget to put the files for fontawesome 5 in a folder where ConTeXt can find them. \usesymbols[fontawesome] \starttext \symbol[fontawesome-regular][credit-card] \symbol[fontawesome-solid][credit-card] \stoptext Wolfgang ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Font Awesome (again)
Hi,
I'm trying to get Font Awesome 5 to work for me, but it only almost does.
Wolfgang's code works and I get a nice list of symbols for all three
variations, so ConTeXt obviously finds the font. But when I try to use
a single symbol, ConTeXt prints the symbol name instead of the symbol.
There must be something I'm overlooking, but I don't know what. Wiki
wasn't very helpful, although we do have an entry on symbols (Font
Awesome, on the other hand, isn't mentioned anywhere on the wiki).
I tried with \symbol[fontawesome-regular][credit-card] (at the end of
my file) and a few variants thereof, but couldn't get the symbol. What
am I doing wrong? What have I missed?
TIA,
Mari
On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 4:45 PM Wolfgang Schuster
wrote:
>
>
>
> Aditya Mahajan schrieb am 07.10.18 um 15:26:
> > Hi,
> >
> > There is a FontAwesome.otf file that is distributed with ConTeXt
> > minimals. Does anyone know what version (4 or 5) of the font it is? I
> > am asking because the names of the symbols used in the font do not
> > match those on the font-awesome website. For example, using
> >
> > \showsymbolset[fontawesome]
>
> The distribution includes version 4.7.
>
> > I get that the symbol for "utensils"
> > (https://fontawesome.com/icons/utensils?style=solid) is actually
> > mapped to "food" in ConTeXt. Since the names of the symbols are now
> > taken from the font, my guess is that the distribution has an old
> > version of the font (also because it is a single font rather than three).
> >
> > Would it make sense to update the fonts in the distribution? If not,
> > then simply remove the old version of the fonts?
> >
> > Also, don't we need to update the symb-imp-fontawesome.mkiv file to
> > work with the new symbols. Font awesome has split the fonts into three
> > (https://fontawesome.com/how-to-use/on-the-desktop/setup/getting-started):
> >
> > Solid, Regular, and Brands. (There are also pro version of the fonts).
> > The simplest way to use them will be to have three symbolsets
> > (fontawesome, fontawesome-solid, and fontawesome-brands), where the
> > names are taken from the fonts.
> >
> > In the meanwhile, Hraban has painstakenly written out the mappings by
> > hand, but the automatic mapping might be simpler (and more future proof).
> > https://github.com/fiee/ConTeXt/blob/master/symbols/symb-awesome5.mkiv
>
> While I have no problem replacing the old symbols you can support both
> when you use new set names for the new version (even for the regular style).
>
>
> \definefontsynonym [FontAwesomeBrands]
> [file:fontawesome5brandsregular400.otf]
> \definefontsynonym [FontAwesomeRegular]
> [file:fontawesome5freeregular400.otf]
> \definefontsynonym [FontAwesomeSolid] [file:fontawesome5freesolid900.otf]
>
> \startsymbolset [fontawesome-brands] [font=FontAwesomeBrands]
>% Font Awesome Brands
> \stopsymbolset
>
> \startsymbolset [fontawesome-regular] [font=FontAwesomeRegular]
>% Font Awesome Regular
> \stopsymbolset
>
> \startsymbolset [fontawesome-solid] [font=FontAwesomeSolid]
>% Font Awesome Solid
> \stopsymbolset
>
> \starttext
>
> \startnamedsection [title] [title={Font Awesome Brands}]
>\showsymbolset [fontawesome-brands]
> \stopnamedsection
>
> \startnamedsection [title] [title={Font Awesome Regular}]
>\showsymbolset [fontawesome-regular]
> \stopnamedsection
>
> \startnamedsection [title] [title={Font Awesome Solid}]
>\showsymbolset [fontawesome-solid]
> \stopnamedsection
>
> \stoptext
>
>
> Wolfgang
> ___
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
> Wiki!
>
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
> archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
> wiki : http://contextgarden.net
> ___
font_awesome_wolfgang.tex
Description: Binary data
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] Font Awesome (again)
On Sun, 7 Oct 2018, Ulrike Fischer wrote: Am Sun, 7 Oct 2018 09:26:11 -0400 (EDT) schrieb Aditya Mahajan: Would it make sense to update the fonts in the distribution? I didn't quite follow the discussion and the suggested code, but from a similar discussion for latex I know that the symbols in fontawesome 4 and 5 looks different (that's why there is an explicit fontawesome5 package in latex). Then Wolfgang's solution makes even more sense as it is possible to use BOTH v4 and v5 of the font. Aditya ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Font Awesome (again)
Am Sun, 7 Oct 2018 09:26:11 -0400 (EDT) schrieb Aditya Mahajan: > Would it make sense to update the fonts in the distribution? I didn't quite follow the discussion and the suggested code, but from a similar discussion for latex I know that the symbols in fontawesome 4 and 5 looks different (that's why there is an explicit fontawesome5 package in latex). -- Ulrike Fischer https://www.troubleshooting-tex.de/ ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Font Awesome (again)
On 10/7/2018 5:25 PM, Alan Braslau wrote: On Sun, 7 Oct 2018 16:19:13 +0200 Hans Hagen wrote: hm, one of these projects that when it got some reasonable user base went 'pro', collects money as kick start which looks proffitable enough to keep all open, but then goes for a limited free version to play nice, and go for a subscription model (so lock-in) ... some fashion in (pseudo) open source ... pretty confusing too (hopefully Hraban got a live long pro license for free) The community offers the 'Pro' version of ConTeXt for free... And context group members also get the 'Enterprise' version for free ... Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Font Awesome (again)
On 10/7/2018 5:39 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Sun, 7 Oct 2018, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: This sounds reasonable. Could we add these definitions to symb-imp-fontawesome? sure - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Font Awesome (again)
On Sun, 7 Oct 2018, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Aditya Mahajan schrieb am 07.10.18 um 15:26:
Hi,
There is a FontAwesome.otf file that is distributed with ConTeXt
minimals. Does anyone know what version (4 or 5) of the font it is? I am
asking because the names of the symbols used in the font do not match
those on the font-awesome website. For example, using
\showsymbolset[fontawesome]
The distribution includes version 4.7.
I get that the symbol for "utensils"
(https://fontawesome.com/icons/utensils?style=solid) is actually mapped
to "food" in ConTeXt. Since the names of the symbols are now taken from
the font, my guess is that the distribution has an old version of the
font (also because it is a single font rather than three).
Would it make sense to update the fonts in the distribution? If not, then
simply remove the old version of the fonts?
Also, don't we need to update the symb-imp-fontawesome.mkiv file to work
with the new symbols. Font awesome has split the fonts into three
(https://fontawesome.com/how-to-use/on-the-desktop/setup/getting-started):
Solid, Regular, and Brands. (There are also pro version of the fonts).
The simplest way to use them will be to have three symbolsets
(fontawesome, fontawesome-solid, and fontawesome-brands), where the names
are taken from the fonts.
In the meanwhile, Hraban has painstakenly written out the mappings by
hand, but the automatic mapping might be simpler (and more future proof).
https://github.com/fiee/ConTeXt/blob/master/symbols/symb-awesome5.mkiv
While I have no problem replacing the old symbols you can support both when
you use new set names for the new version (even for the regular style).
\definefontsynonym [FontAwesomeBrands]
[file:fontawesome5brandsregular400.otf]
\definefontsynonym [FontAwesomeRegular]
[file:fontawesome5freeregular400.otf]
\definefontsynonym [FontAwesomeSolid] [file:fontawesome5freesolid900.otf]
\startsymbolset [fontawesome-brands] [font=FontAwesomeBrands]
% Font Awesome Brands
\stopsymbolset
\startsymbolset [fontawesome-regular] [font=FontAwesomeRegular]
% Font Awesome Regular
\stopsymbolset
\startsymbolset [fontawesome-solid] [font=FontAwesomeSolid]
% Font Awesome Solid
\stopsymbolset
\starttext
\startnamedsection [title] [title={Font Awesome Brands}]
\showsymbolset [fontawesome-brands]
\stopnamedsection
\startnamedsection [title] [title={Font Awesome Regular}]
\showsymbolset [fontawesome-regular]
\stopnamedsection
\startnamedsection [title] [title={Font Awesome Solid}]
\showsymbolset [fontawesome-solid]
\stopnamedsection
\stoptext
This sounds reasonable. Could we add these definitions to
symb-imp-fontawesome?
Thanks,
Aditya___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] Font Awesome (again)
On Sun, 7 Oct 2018 16:19:13 +0200 Hans Hagen wrote: > hm, one of these projects that when it got some reasonable user base > went 'pro', collects money as kick start which looks proffitable enough > to keep all open, but then goes for a limited free version to play nice, > and go for a subscription model (so lock-in) ... some fashion in > (pseudo) open source ... pretty confusing too (hopefully Hraban got a > live long pro license for free) The community offers the 'Pro' version of ConTeXt for free... ;-) ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Font Awesome (again)
On 10/7/2018 3:43 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Aditya Mahajan schrieb am 07.10.18 um 15:26:
Hi,
There is a FontAwesome.otf file that is distributed with ConTeXt
minimals. Does anyone know what version (4 or 5) of the font it is? I
am asking because the names of the symbols used in the font do not
match those on the font-awesome website. For example, using
\showsymbolset[fontawesome]
The distribution includes version 4.7.
I get that the symbol for "utensils"
(https://fontawesome.com/icons/utensils?style=solid) is actually
mapped to "food" in ConTeXt. Since the names of the symbols are now
taken from the font, my guess is that the distribution has an old
version of the font (also because it is a single font rather than three).
Would it make sense to update the fonts in the distribution? If not,
then simply remove the old version of the fonts?
Also, don't we need to update the symb-imp-fontawesome.mkiv file to
work with the new symbols. Font awesome has split the fonts into three
(https://fontawesome.com/how-to-use/on-the-desktop/setup/getting-started):
Solid, Regular, and Brands. (There are also pro version of the fonts).
The simplest way to use them will be to have three symbolsets
(fontawesome, fontawesome-solid, and fontawesome-brands), where the
names are taken from the fonts.
In the meanwhile, Hraban has painstakenly written out the mappings by
hand, but the automatic mapping might be simpler (and more future proof).
https://github.com/fiee/ConTeXt/blob/master/symbols/symb-awesome5.mkiv
While I have no problem replacing the old symbols you can support both
when you use new set names for the new version (even for the regular
style).
\definefontsynonym [FontAwesomeBrands]
[file:fontawesome5brandsregular400.otf]
\definefontsynonym [FontAwesomeRegular]
[file:fontawesome5freeregular400.otf]
\definefontsynonym [FontAwesomeSolid] [file:fontawesome5freesolid900.otf]
\startsymbolset [fontawesome-brands] [font=FontAwesomeBrands]
% Font Awesome Brands
\stopsymbolset
\startsymbolset [fontawesome-regular] [font=FontAwesomeRegular]
% Font Awesome Regular
\stopsymbolset
\startsymbolset [fontawesome-solid] [font=FontAwesomeSolid]
% Font Awesome Solid
\stopsymbolset
\starttext
\startnamedsection [title] [title={Font Awesome Brands}]
\showsymbolset [fontawesome-brands]
\stopnamedsection
\startnamedsection [title] [title={Font Awesome Regular}]
\showsymbolset [fontawesome-regular]
\stopnamedsection
\startnamedsection [title] [title={Font Awesome Solid}]
\showsymbolset [fontawesome-solid]
\stopnamedsection
\stoptext
hm, one of these projects that when it got some reasonable user base
went 'pro', collects money as kick start which looks proffitable enough
to keep all open, but then goes for a limited free version to play nice,
and go for a subscription model (so lock-in) ... some fashion in
(pseudo) open source ... pretty confusing too (hopefully Hraban got a
live long pro license for free)
Hans
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] Font Awesome (again)
Aditya Mahajan schrieb am 07.10.18 um 15:26:
Hi,
There is a FontAwesome.otf file that is distributed with ConTeXt
minimals. Does anyone know what version (4 or 5) of the font it is? I
am asking because the names of the symbols used in the font do not
match those on the font-awesome website. For example, using
\showsymbolset[fontawesome]
The distribution includes version 4.7.
I get that the symbol for "utensils"
(https://fontawesome.com/icons/utensils?style=solid) is actually
mapped to "food" in ConTeXt. Since the names of the symbols are now
taken from the font, my guess is that the distribution has an old
version of the font (also because it is a single font rather than three).
Would it make sense to update the fonts in the distribution? If not,
then simply remove the old version of the fonts?
Also, don't we need to update the symb-imp-fontawesome.mkiv file to
work with the new symbols. Font awesome has split the fonts into three
(https://fontawesome.com/how-to-use/on-the-desktop/setup/getting-started):
Solid, Regular, and Brands. (There are also pro version of the fonts).
The simplest way to use them will be to have three symbolsets
(fontawesome, fontawesome-solid, and fontawesome-brands), where the
names are taken from the fonts.
In the meanwhile, Hraban has painstakenly written out the mappings by
hand, but the automatic mapping might be simpler (and more future proof).
https://github.com/fiee/ConTeXt/blob/master/symbols/symb-awesome5.mkiv
While I have no problem replacing the old symbols you can support both
when you use new set names for the new version (even for the regular style).
\definefontsynonym [FontAwesomeBrands]
[file:fontawesome5brandsregular400.otf]
\definefontsynonym [FontAwesomeRegular]
[file:fontawesome5freeregular400.otf]
\definefontsynonym [FontAwesomeSolid] [file:fontawesome5freesolid900.otf]
\startsymbolset [fontawesome-brands] [font=FontAwesomeBrands]
% Font Awesome Brands
\stopsymbolset
\startsymbolset [fontawesome-regular] [font=FontAwesomeRegular]
% Font Awesome Regular
\stopsymbolset
\startsymbolset [fontawesome-solid] [font=FontAwesomeSolid]
% Font Awesome Solid
\stopsymbolset
\starttext
\startnamedsection [title] [title={Font Awesome Brands}]
\showsymbolset [fontawesome-brands]
\stopnamedsection
\startnamedsection [title] [title={Font Awesome Regular}]
\showsymbolset [fontawesome-regular]
\stopnamedsection
\startnamedsection [title] [title={Font Awesome Solid}]
\showsymbolset [fontawesome-solid]
\stopnamedsection
\stoptext
Wolfgang
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
