On 23.05.2011 23:47, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
As to the question "why strings": Pontus's answer named one important aspect. I have several .bib files which contain
nothing but string definitions: one with abbreviated, one with full journal titles; one with English strings
("reprint," "Munich")
On May 23, 2011, at 11:32 PM, John Haltiwanger wrote:
> I hope my question does not come off as too aggressive, but why on earth are
> we still using BibTeX? Or, more accurately, when can we _stop_ using BibTeX
> and move onto something that has native UTF-8 support and can also integrate
> wi
> What is the next step for bibliographies in Context? Surely we won't be
> chained to BibTeX (which has seemingly been largely been in practice for the
> sake of BibLaTeX) forever?
Perhaps Biber (http://biblatex-biber.sourceforge.net/) could fill the void.
It supports Unicode, is BibTeX compatibl
On Mon 23 May 2011, Stefan Müller wrote:
> Okay, then I should definitely take a look at JabRef. Anyhow, maybe I'm
> naive here, but I don't see a reason why Zotero should support BibTeX
> Strings. If I type the BibTeX file manually, sure. But Zotero reads the
> (e.g.) Journal names from the
I hope my question does not come off as too aggressive, but why on earth are
we still using BibTeX? Or, more accurately, when can we _stop_ using BibTeX
and move onto something that has native UTF-8 support and can also integrate
with a reasonable configuration environment such as CSL?
What is the
Okay, then I should definitely take a look at JabRef. Anyhow, maybe I'm
naive here, but I don't see a reason why Zotero should support BibTeX
Strings. If I type the BibTeX file manually, sure. But Zotero reads the
(e.g.) Journal names from the corresponding websites, so there should be
no need
On May 23, 2011, at 10:45 PM, Stefan Müller wrote:
> +1 for Zotero
>
> I tried Mendeley some time ago. It's standalone but sill quite similar to
> Zotero. "Browser-integration" works via a special bookmark. It also has an
> embedded pdf-viewer, which is very neat. Reason for changing to Zotere
On 22.05.2011 22:14, Otso Helenius wrote:
using ConTeXt and not LaTeX you maybe also use a nice reference
management software the main stream does not know about. But probably it
is not related to ConTeXt at all since it is BibTeX in the end.
I can warmly recommend Zotero. It works very well
On Sat 21 May 2011, Paul Menzel wrote:
> using ConTeXt and not LaTeX you maybe also use a nice reference
> management software the main stream does not know about. But
> probably it is not related to ConTeXt at all since it is BibTeX in
> the end.
As someone using stone-age reference management (
>using ConTeXt and not LaTeX you maybe also use a nice reference
>management software the main stream does not know about. But probably it
>is not related to ConTeXt at all since it is BibTeX in the end.
I can warmly recommend Zotero. It works very well and can fetch content
directly from web page
Hi Paul,
I recently switched from "Papers" (Mac only, commercial) to JabRef.
Advantages: JabRef is open source, and I can use it at work (Macs) and
at home (Linux). I like it -- it has everything I need (searching
PubMed etc., managing a collection of pdf-files...).
Cheers, Jörg
Quoting
11 matches
Mail list logo
